Saturday, August 30, 2003

Al Qaeda-TYPE?!

al-Qaeda-TYPE???????!

"...US President George Bush said earlier this month that more foreign "al-Qaeda-type fighters" have moved in."

More al-Qaeda types?




Shown: John Brown, Timothy McVeigh, Benedict Arnold, Randy Weaver, David Koresh, Nancy Morgan Hart, Boston Tea Party, Daniel Shays of Shays' Rebellion


From:

Blast suspects linked to bin Laden, Saddam
By Tarek Al-Issawi

August 31, 2003
The Sun-Herald


READ THIS AND CONSIDER THAT THERE WERE NO TIES BETWEEN SADDAM HUSSEIN AND OSAMA BIN LADEN BEFORE BUSH LED US INTO THIS UNILATERAL PREEMPTIVE ATTACK UPON IRAQ.
BUSH HAS MADE US CITIZENS AND THE PEOPLE OF IRAQ LESS SECURE THAN EVER BEFORE.
HOW, YOU ASK?
BY CREATING A SITUATION WHERE MEN LIKE HUSSEIN AND BIN LADEN, ONCE AT ODDS WITH ONE ANOTHER, WOULD COME TOGETHER IN SOLIDARITY.
YES--BUSH IS A UNITER...NOT A DIVIDER.
THE PROBLEM IS THIS: HE'S NOT UNITING THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OR THE WORLD COMMUNITY....HE'S UNITING TERRORISTS.


"....Najaf governor Haidar Mehdi Matar said the four suspects were two Iraqis from Saddam Hussein's fallen regime and two Arab nationals, categorised as Sunni Muslim radicals.

A senior police official said earlier that all four had connections to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terror network."


Paul Bremer was WHERE?!

Paul Bremer was WHERE??!



Does anyone else think it's totally inappropriate for Paul Bremer to be taking a VACATION while our troops are dying?!

From NY Times:

Death and Hesitation in Iraq

By DEXTER FILKINS

BAGHDAD, Iraq --

"The car bomb that killed one of Iraq's most important spiritual
leaders today was apparently met by a political vacuum in the nation's
capital, where the Iraqi and American officials charting the country's
future seemed unsure who should respond and how.

Ayatollah Muhammad Bakr al-Hakim, a symbol of moderation in this
restive land, was dead. Religious leaders called for blood and
vengeance, and in some places the ayatollah's mourners took to the
streets.

Yet here in Baghdad, the Iraqi and American officials charged with
shepherding this country toward democratic rule went about their
business as if little had changed.

There were no speeches calling for calm and few public appearances by
anyone in charge. L. Paul Bremer III, the chief American
administrator, was on vacation.


Nobody seemed to know when exactly he would return.

The American military command here said nothing...."

See link for entire article.


Friday, August 29, 2003

Alastair Campbell Quits

Alastair Campbell quits

The BBC is slowly being vindicated.








HAVE WE LEARNED???

WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE REMIND GEORGE W. BUSH?


Hot Summer? Hotter Fall

Hot Summer? Hotter Fall
From Tom Paine.com

Hey, Mr. Bush...


"Bush could only react, interrupting his vacation -- and his fundraising -- to issue a soundbite about energy policy and deliver more boilerplate about evildoer terrorists. The president was all talk and no action, which only drives home the point that, while Iraq is burning, he's chopping wood....

...I can't help but think of Bush's father, who insisted that all was right with the world right up until the voters gave him a nice long vacation."

Iraq: One in Three US Military Dollars Spent Goes to Halliburton

Iraq: One in Three US Military Dollars Spent Goes to Halliburton
From CorpWatch.org

"..The size and scope of the government contracts awarded to Halliburton in connection with the war in Iraq are significantly greater than was previously disclosed and demonstrate the U.S. military's increasing reliance on for-profit corporations to run its logistical operations..."

"...The amount of money [earned by Halliburton] is quite staggering, far more than we were originally led to believe. This is clearly a trend under this administration, and it concerns me because often the privatization of government services ends up costing the taxpayers more money rather than less."
U.S. Rep Henry Waxman


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



This is freedom? This is the answer to the evils of Big Government? Toiling to pay your taxes to Halliburton while the nation's deficit could fill up the Grand Canyon?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"...Independent experts said the trend toward outsourcing logistic operations has resulted in new problems, such as a lack of accountability and transparency on the part of private military firms and sometimes questionable billing practices..."

"...."At the end of the day, neither these companies nor their employees are bound by military justice, and it is up to them whether to show up or not," Singer said. "The result is that there have been delays in setting up showers for soldiers, getting them cooked meals and so on."
A related concern is the rising cost of hiring contract workers because of skyrocketing insurance premiums. Singer estimates that premiums have increased by 300 percent to 400 percent this year, costs that are passed on to the taxpayer under the cost-plus-award fee system that is the basis for most contracts...."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

COMPANION STORY: Two U.S. Firms Hit Iraq Jackpot




Operation Iraqi Freedom: The well-hidden and forgotten wounded

Operation Iraqi Freedom:
The well-hidden and forgotten wounded


Wounded, Weary And Disappeared
From Tom Paine.com

"......the president has not shown up at Walter Reed Army Medical Center to shake
hands with the recovering Robert Garrisons or Kenneth Dixons. Journalists should
pay these visits for him, to tell us the stories of these men and women, whose
problems will stretch into the coming years. And they should ask the president
why he is so reluctant to see these troops he sent so confidently into battle....."


Thursday, August 28, 2003

Operation Iraqi Freedom: More lies on the Way

More lies, exaggerations, and cover-your-ass-syle WMD intelligence reports are on the way....



".....Canon Andrew White said Tony Blair had joined forces with the Americans to produce evidence on how the WMDs were removed by Saddam Hussein prior to invasion."

Wednesday, August 27, 2003

In a Long Presidential Race, Dean Sprints

DEAN WOWED 10,000 IN BRYANT PARK LAST NIGHT

In a Long Presidential Race, Dean Sprints
By JODI WILGOREN
NY Times Aug 27, 2003

"....The large and energetic crowds that followed Dr. Dean, and the meticulousness of his schedule and stage-managed events, prove he remains a phenomenon...."

From the Lessig blog

An excellent blog-related interview with Howard Dean campaign manager Joe Trippi at Professor Lawrence Lessig's blog

Excerpt:

L: So when the Democratic Leadership Council attacks your campaign, are they attacking your campaign because they're not comfortable with this form of democracy?

T: Yes. I really think that's a good part of it. I think the one reason we have so much opposition — even within our own party — is because they like being in charge. They like it the way it is, or at least, too many of them do. And they're actually afraid of what would happen if people actually gave a damn again and started becoming involved and actually demanded that issues like healthcare got addressed without special interests whacking it down.

So yes, I have come to believe that a large part of why the DLC attacks Howard Dean so vehemently has a lot more to do with the power of what they're saying this campaign is about. They're not real thrilled with it.




Unprepared for Peace in Iraq by Sen. Robert Byrd



From the Washington Post

Unprepared for Peace in Iraq

By Robert C. Byrd
Tuesday, August 26, 2003; Page A13

As the situation in Iraq continues to spiral out of control, an anxious nation watches. Despite assurances to the American people that our troops would be welcomed with open arms as liberators, U.S. soldiers are increasingly being met with guns and car bombs. The bombing at the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad has clearly exposed our vacant policy in Iraq. The American people are told to be patient, that winning the peace will take time. Meanwhile, the frustration of the Iraqi people grows by the day, as does their anger. The inability of the United States even to restore basic amenities further fuels the fire.


Before the war began, I urged the president to think through the consequences. There was no doubt as to the military outcome of war between the United States and Iraq; our might was unquestioned. But I was very concerned about the repercussions that would follow, especially if we were unable to persuade key allies to join our effort.

Today I urge President Bush to review his options. It is time to ask the world community not only for assistance in restoring peace and security in Iraq but also for participation in moving Iraq toward self-government. While the secretary of state has opened a dialogue with the United Nations, it must be a true exchange and not a U.S. monologue.

What has become tragically clear is that the United States has no strong plan for turning Iraq over to the Iraqi people and is quickly losing even its ability to maintain order. The administration is stumbling through the dark, hoping by luck to find the lighted path to peace and stability.

Despite the best hopes for an Iraqi democracy, the Iraqi people and the world see only the worst fears of occupation. Instead of inspiring steps toward self-government, we witness hit-and-run murders of U.S. soldiers, terrorist attacks and sabotage. Our military action in Iraq has forged a caldron of contempt for America, a dangerous brew that may poison the efforts of peace throughout the Middle East and result in the rapid invigoration of worldwide terrorism.

The president's stubborn insistence that much of the world be shut out of real participation in the rebuilding effort in Iraq is obviously costing lives. In addition, it is costing the United States credibility in Iraq and around the globe. We promised to improve the quality of life, yet so far we have failed to deliver. As a result, increasing numbers of Iraqis see the United States only as occupier, not liberator.

Instead of giving the young people of Iraq a reason to turn away from the violence of terrorism, we have, through failures and unkept promises, fed the seeds of discontent. The inability of the United States to secure the peace in Iraq virtually guarantees al Qaeda a fertile field of new recruits.

War has proved far easier than peace. We had the weapons to win the war, but not the wisdom to secure the peace. The coalition of those who might be willing to share the burden of building a new Iraq will be harder to muster now. But the challenge is too great for the United States alone. The rapidly rising anti-American sentiment demands that an international effort be initiated before Iraq slips from decades of dictatorship to decades of chaos.

The administration's reconstruction effort is costing the American people $1 billion a week. It is costing the lives of American soldiers and of civilians from many nations. Only an entirely closed mind could fail to grasp the need for a change in course. Close cooperation with the international community might yet yield a plan for peace and security for the people of Iraq. Haughty statements and unilateral actions will not advance our cause. We must work with other countries to forge what we cannot achieve alone: a lasting peace for Iraq and, in fact, for the Middle East region as a whole.

A hallmark of true leadership is the ability to admit when one is wrong and to learn from errors. Candidate George W. Bush spoke about the need for humility from a great and powerful nation. He said, "Let us reject the blinders of isolationism, just as we refuse the crown of empire. Let us not dominate others with our power -- or betray them with our indifference. And let us have an American foreign policy that reflects American character. The modesty of true strength. The humility of real greatness." It is time for the Bush administration to swallow its false pride and return to that philosophy of humility before it is too late.

The writer is a Democratic senator from West Virginia.


© 2003 The Washington Post Company


Tuesday, August 26, 2003

Bush MIA in Alabama

Bush MIA in Alabama
Even the Christian Right sees Bush for the Rove-bum-sucking hypocrite he is


Excerpt:

"......Glaringly obvious by default in all this is President Bush. Here is the opportunity for Mr. Bush to show some genuine leadership and throw his moral support behind Judge Moore and the hundreds of thousands whom he has now come to represent and what does he do or say? Nothing! Not a peep out of the man. Apparently Karl Rove has given him his marching orders and advised him to stay away from such “contentious” issues. After all, he has an election next year and wouldn’t want to rock the boat or make any waves, especially waves that the media might consider to be religious ones at that. It seems to never fail that those grass roots supporters of the Republican Party who feel most deeply and passionately about religious or social matters are destined to meet with the same old treatment time and time again from the Republican establishment. Tell ‘em how much we are on their side when it comes time for elections, promise them to be mindful of their concerns and govern with those in mind and then sweep them under the rug once they are gullible enough to continue voting for men and women who promptly abandon them and their cause when installed in office.

For a man who claims to be guided by his faith and once stated during the election contest of 2000, that the most influential person in his life was Jesus Christ, the President has amazingly seemed to have lost his tongue. Hmmm – one wonders if this affliction is endemic to the water source of Washington D.C. or has a more potent source that can be traced to the machinations of Karl Rove’s brain. Find your voice Mr. President and find it quickly lest when it comes time next year and you regain it, your friends will no longer hear it....."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"....The impish fiends that comprise such as “Americans United for Separation of Church and State” and “the ACLU”, the groups that filed suit against Moore to have the monument removed, seem to have made it their mission in life to banish any and all references to God from the public arena anywhere in this land...."

Impish fiends?
Come on, people!
Get real!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

".......They are longing to see someone, anyone, in public office take a principled stand and give voice to the grief and despair they are feeling as they daily witness the heritage of their beloved nation being shredded before their eyes by those who would remake society into a moral abyss....."

My comments to the Christian Right:

The heritage of our beloved nation is a civic heritage. We are not a theocracy, people. Pakistan is on the brink of being a total theocracy with a fundamentalist political majority. Is this what you want for America? I certainly hope not!
When you realize that your American heritage is based in civil law and when you realize that the wording of the Constitution does not bear even a vague resemblance to the story of Moses...and realize you are still perfectly free to civilly disobey the court order (which I support your RIGHT to do)..then you JUST MIGHT start to "get it". Monument or no monument, what is in your hearts and souls can never be taken away. But certain inalienable rights can indeed be lost by a theocratic style of governing.
If you win what you consider to be your "culture war" and we slowly inch our way to becoming a theocracy, we will all stand to lose our true American heritage.
Your religion will also be damaged by the push and pull of those who would seek worldy political gain. No one truly knows what is in another man's heart.
Judge Moore may wish to seek worldly gain from this grand protest. A Senate seat, perhaps?

Freedom of religion is indeed an American birthright according to our Constitution. So is Freedom of Speech. You're within your rights to stage this protest.
But in the end, I do not believe you are right to make your courthouses a place of worship.

President Bush is using Christ to seek worldly gain...your political favour, to be precise.
Beware the same of Judge Moore.

Hold on to God...and not the ways of the world...lest you lose your souls along with your true American heritage.

India/Pakistan It's A Small World

It's A Small World

The Hellblazer blog has an important message to relay today.
Yesterday's bombings in Bombay may likely be linked to the US War on terror (past, present, and/or future) in ways that are
well-explained by educated and reliable writers at Stratfor.com. The geopolitical implications are most concerning.
The Bush adminstration has unilaterally bitten off far more than it can chew. The cracks are beginning to show.

See link HERE.

Note: Meanwhile, the U.S. is making the powderkeg known as Pakistan happy by selling them 28 F-16 Fighter aircraft. *which are capable of carrying nuclear devices*

Stratfor.com:

".....Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf is due to meet with U.S. President George W. Bush at Camp David in late June. The leaders reportedly will discuss a range of topics, including the sale of 28 F-16 fighter craft to Pakistan. Those aircraft -- along with [ $1.8 billion] debt forgiveness and trade status -- likely will be Washington's reward for Pakistan's support in the war against al Qaeda...."

BREAKING NEWS:

A new crisis in the US War on 'terror'?

India Blames Muslim Militants for Blasts

"...India's government blamed Muslim militants Tuesday for explosions that shook Bombay a day earlier and accused rival Pakistan of trying to destabilize the country.
Indian officials stopped short of saying Pakistan had dispatched the bombers, but the comments appeared sure to undermine a fragile peace process between the two nuclear-armed neighbors...."


Toby Keith Reconsiders

Toby Keith picks 'n chooses who gets a boot up the ass
When it comes to war, Toby is "pro-choice".




TO KICK OR NOT TO KICK? THAT IS THE QUESTION...


"...Look, my stance is I pick and choose my wars. This war here [in Iraq], the math hasn't worked out for me on it....." Toby Keith

Chris at Interesting Timesblog has posted an interesting story, indeed.
It seems that even Toby Keith, the "put-a-boot-up-your-ass" pro-war proponent, is not convinced that Iraq was such a hot idear.

Link HERE.

Update: Hutton Inquiry

Update: Hutton Inquiry


No, no....not THIS Hutton.....



The Hutton who does business here.....


Revelations at the heart of the Kelly affair: the story so far--
After two weeks of testimony the inquiry already has answers to many questions, says Paul Waugh


Are you interested in the status of the microscopic look at the sex-up of the infamous British dossier..aka The Hutton Inquiry?
You should be.
It's the dossier responsible today, at least in part, for our men and women giving their lives in guerilla warfare.
Doesn't that piss you off?
It's the con job with which our own American leadership fell into false step and about which they either exaggerated or lied to us.
This is a great summary of the testimony to date.

My fellow Americans-We Have Been Conned

My Fellow Americans--We Have Been Conned

IRAQ: A BAIT-AND-SWITCH CON JOB
by Richard Reeves
Universal Press Syndicate




"..Vice President Richard Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, leaders of the zealots, told us how easy it would be..."




...War on the cheap....."




"....The zealots seemed capable of saying anything to "bait" us into war -- and they have prevailed. Their dream, essentially a unilateralist, single-superpower dream, was of a Middle East controlled by the United States, with the rest of the world, led by the United Nations, cleaning up the mess and the details..."




"..Americans, deceived and conned, have woken up to find their magnificently trained, equipped and motivated young soldiers pinned down in a hostile environment....."




Most of the Democrats chasing the chance to run against him next year are now criticizing the war, mildly to be sure, but they voted for it when they had a chance to slow him down and ask what exactly he had in mind.
They know, as the president knows, that now that our troops are in harm's way, most politicians must "support" them, whatever that means. That's the "switch."

Monday, August 25, 2003

To Bush Administration: Lose the Political Pride

BUSH ADMINISTRATION: LOSE THE POLITICAL PRIDE FOR THE SAKE OF OUR TROOPS AND THEIR MISSION! HELP THEM AND THE WORLD TO WORK TOGETHER TO COMBAT TERROR OR WE WILL FAIL MISERABLY!

How very dismaying to read this article tonight.
- "U.S. May Drop Bid for New U.N. Resolution"
Our leaders are acting like possessive children.
Every dead or wounded soldier is their fault every bit as much as the Iraqi resistance itself.
I never thought I'd live to see a day we'd have such horrific leadership in this nation.

Excerpt:


"...Powell has made clear that Washington won't cede any of its decision-making powers in Iraq.

France, Russia, India and other countries have ruled out sending soldiers to Iraq unless a multinational force is authorized by the United Nations.

France's deputy U.N. ambassador Michel Duclos said the current impasse would not exist if a genuine international partnership had been established at the outset, under the guidance of the United Nations, to address Iraq's problems.

``Sharing the burden and the responsibilities in a world of equal and sovereign nations means also sharing information and authority,'' Duclos said..."



The Dying Vision

THE DYING VISION

"The president's vision will, in the coming months, either be launched successfully in Iraq, or it will die in Iraq."

Condoleeza Rice





Even the Bush administration's favorite NeoCon Bill Kristol can see it's dying.
When you hear him pleading for Bush to listen to the "critics", we know we have a problem!

Note that Kristol gives the lamest reasons to ignore consideration of the need for a new U.N. resolution with wide international support.
This is what makes him the NeoCon he is. This leopard will not change his spots. Given Kristol's favorable status with those connected with the Bush administration, he may wind up being a wider part of the problem by sticking stubbornly to the PNAC "new-world-order" blueprint.

At least he acknowleges that it IS "painfully obvious that there are too few American troops operating in Iraq".
Truer words were never spoken.
However, if we hold onto pride and painfully obvious American greed (both political power-greed and economic-greed), we will soon see the
military draft reactivated...along with more American deaths and American citizens pouring into the dissenting streets.

Mark these words.

Road Map to Nowhere

WHY is Condoleeza Rice leaning on Israel while pushing Palestine toward a civil war?
Does the Bush administration believe this will bring about MORE peace?

REALLY??!

I think Israel gets a slap in its face every time we tell them to stop defending themselves by tracking down Hamas leaders.
The Sharon-method of "tracking down terror suspects" is much like Bush's own recent "tracking down" of Uday and Qusay Hussein.
We're taking no prisoners--just killing them.
As a nation, what a fine example we have recently set.
Look how far this method of "justice-seeking" has gotten Israel these past 60 years.

We are becoming the new version of Sharon's Israel.
What a pity.
Bush has helped set us on a course for a never-ending cycle of violence.
Playing into the tribal and vengeful hands of terror.

We may be a powerful nation, but, much like Sharon's Israel, our leaders have absolutely no clue how to successfully fight non-state-supported terrorism.

When we become the new Israel, our "tribal religion" will be far more dangerous than the tribes that espouse Islamic or Jewish faiths.
Our American-tribal tenet, as it stands today, seems to be our faith in "the speading of democracy".
The Christian missions did their part in destroying many innocent lives throughout the world.
Imagine what the new tribal faith of extremist America could do......

Why does Condoleeza Rice state that "..Despite the horrific events of recent days, we have seen progress toward peace for Israelis and Palestinians'' ??!??????? What progress? Where?

How can Rice say. "The terrorists will not succeed'' when, every single time an or an innocent is blown apart by a suicide bomb, terror
succeeds in its mission?

Terror will continue to succeed until we, in concert with the good people of the world community, start DOING something instead of talking about bogus road maps and telling nations that they must adopt our version of "democracy".
Concentrate on the health of our OWN democracy in the U.S.
It is suffering from what could be a terminal illness.

Until then, people of Israel---build that security fence HIGH and do what you must to protect the innocent.



Your leader is failing you...much like our own leader GW Bush is failing America.

I pray for your safety this day.

The Media Is Lying to Us

THE MEDIA IS LYING TO US.



It may be a peddling of soft lies, but the result is a fatally misinformed American public.

HERE'S SOME PROOF:

LOOK AT THE DIFFERENCE IN THESE POLL RESULTS!

IN A RECENT NEWSWEEK POLL, 1,011 Americans were asked the same questions that are now being posed to the INTERNET public-at-large.

WHAT A DIFFERENCE WHEN YOU ASK MORE PEOPLE------**PEOPLE WHO MAY VERY WELL BE MORE INFORMED.

LOOK AT THE VARIANCE IN RESULTS....ESPECIALLY QUESTIONS 4 and 5!
Re: US TROOPS: MOST PEOPLE SAY "BRING THEM HOME NOW!"



ON THE INTERNET:
There are already 16,563 web site responses represented here..this is 16 times that of the NEWSWEEK telephone poll.
* Percentages may not total to 100% for each question due to non-responses

The percentages on the left represent the results of the national poll (1,011 people),not including the INTERNET response (16,563 people).

The percentages shown on the left are the INTERNET responses.

The poll was taken August 22-23, 2003 and had a +/- 3 percent margin of error. 1. Do you approve of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?


Yes 17% / 53%
No 81% / 36%
Don't know 2% / 11%


2. How confident are you that the United States will successfully establish a stable, democratic form of government in Iraq over the long term?

Very confident 9%/ 54%
Somewhat confident 7% / 40%
Not too confident 13% / 6%
Not at all confident 69% / undefined%
Don't know 1% / undefined%



3. How well do you think U.S. efforts to establish security and rebuild Iraq have gone since major combat ended on May 1?

Very well 6% / 18%
Somewhat well 9% / 37%
Not too well 14% / 21%
Not at all well 71% / 19%
Don't know 0% / 5%


4. From what you know now, do think the United States did the right thing in taking military action against Iraq last March?

Yes, the United States did the right thing 19% / 61%
No, it did not do the right thing 78% / 33%
Don't know 2% / 6%



5. For how much longer would you support keeping large numbers of U.S. military personnel in Iraq to help establish security and rebuild the country?

Less than one year 23% / 28%
One to two years 13% / 28%
Three to five years 9% / 19%
Six to 10 years 4% / 3%
More than 10 years? 3% / 11.5%
No longer--bring them home now 44% / 7%
Don't know 4% / undefined%


6. Do you support this current level of U.S. spending (about $1 billion a week) to establish security in Iraq and rebuild the country?

Yes, I support current spending levels 20% / 34%
No, the U.S. should reduce spending and scale back its efforts 76% / 60%
Don't know 4% / 6%


REMEMBER THIS....THE MEDIA IS SPOUTING OUT THE TELEPHONE-NEWSWEEK POLL NUMBERS AS IF THEY ARE GOSPEL TRUTH AND RELIABLE INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLIC OPINION.

THAT'S PURE BULLSHIT!

LOOK at the replies by the INTERNET on question 2.
69% of those polled say they are NOT AT ALL CONFIDENT that the United States will successfully establish a stable, democratic form of government in Iraq over the long term.
NOW---look at Newsweek's statement in the title of their Sept 1 article which I have posted DIRECTLY BELOW.

( "The public posture is confident, but the jitters are real. Under fire in Iraq, Team Bush ponders its options" )

IT'S A LIE!
Over two thirds of us see it falling apart.



They've gotten it wrong before.
They're getting it wronger today.
Don't believe all you see.
Heck--don't believe THIS if you have the informed intuition not to. ;)

SEE: http://www.msnbc.com/news/956458.asp

Also see NY Times article about the Newsweek poll and an ABC Poll of 1,024 people. These results not be getting the weight that they wind up receiving in the media and the press. It seems not only frivilous and disingenuous, but nearly criminal when American lives are at stake. I highly disrespect today's American media for this reason.

If we had a leader who had an ounce of true humility, he would go to the United Nations immediately and implore them to fully contribute to what could be a very worthy effort. Our poor American leadership has caused an influx of terror in the entire Middle Eastern region and strong distaste for America by those who could have been our best allies. The Bush administration has engendered mistrust in the American people as well. It's a prideful, secretive, and defensive leadership that will SINK the mission in Iraq if things don't change very soon.
If we only want to hold onto Iraq like it's our little treasure, we will never..I repeat NEVER win the hearts and minds of anyone, Iraqi, Russian, German, or American.
The intent of the is administration is looking possessive and greedy. It doesn't seem like we're acting in good faith.
I really hope Bush doesn't think God is leading his soul....because I never saw God that way. If God is that way, I don't want to be a member of His club anymore.

The poll results would CHANGE if the Bush administration began to LEAD in a meaningful way.