Kerry and the Iraq Votes
Can Kerry Just Be Himself?
By J. Douglas Allen-Taylor Berkeley Daily Planet
This isn't going to be easy.
In a post-9/11 world, Mr. Allen-Taylor states that progressives (ie:
Robert Scheer) should not look to the election of 2004 as a reprisal of 1968.
The U.S. military presence in Iraq that is exacerbating the problems we face in the Middle East. Most Americans now believe that we never should have invaded. They also believe that a precipitous U.S. withdrawal would make things worse. These are legitimate yet opposing views.
John Kerry became the Democratic Party nominee precisely because he
fudged his positions on Iraqi withdrawal, straddling the great American divide (
yes, we shouldn't have gone in, but how we should leave is a matter yet to be determined). Turning from that course in either direction would now tip the balance and lose Kerry one wing of the Democratic Party or the other, dumping all of us into the abyss.
The only way the nation will have a chance – within the next four years – of pulling itself out of this Middle East mess, is to let Kerry
BE Kerry. If Bush wins, we go in deeper, without a doubt. If Mr. Kerry wins, we may not.
Mr. Allen-Taylor makes the observation that it's not the best of choices. But it's the best choice we're going to get.
If you love your country, why on earth wouldn't you hate a person who you firmly believed was destroying it?
Allen-Taylor's article sounds like what we've come to know as "
Anyone But Bush".
Is that a negative thing? I don't think so.
Is it a "Bush-hate" thing? Sure, I think it is.
We all know what hating Bush means.
Why deny it?
Many people believe he's the worst president this country has ever had.
If you love your country, why on earth
wouldn't you hate a person who you firmly believed was destroying it?
What do
you think?