Meet Buckhead
"You can ask the questions but I'm not going to answer them. I'm just going to stick to doing no interviews...Freepers collectively possess more analytical horsepower than the entire news division at CBS."
--Harry W. MacDougald
McDouglad aka "Buckhead"
Harry MacDougald is a lawyer in the Atlanta office of the Winston-Salem, N.C.-based firm Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice and is affiliated with two prominent conservative legal groups, the Federalist Society and the Southeastern Legal Foundation.
From the LA Times:
Until The Times identified him by piecing together information from his postings over the past two years, MacDougald had taken pains to remain in the shadows — saying the credit for challenging CBS should remain with the blogosphere as a whole and not one individual.
While some bloggers and some conservative activists hail "Buckhead" as a hero in their efforts to paint the mainstream media as politically biased, I would just as seriously question the motives of the nexus of activists that are working in the shadows to get Bush re-elected.
Let's admit it, "Buckhead" is no Edward R. Murrow. Rather than fearlessly inspiring courage and loyalty among fellow journalists, "Buckhead" lurked in the conservative shadows and let bloggers do his partisan bidding for him.
I appreciate collegiality among the blogging crowd, and I have consistently supported the blogging community overall.
I do sense some blogs are not at all independent, and that some are just another part of the right wing machine. I read a recent Weekly Standard article, where writer
John Last serves only to divide the blogging community into right and left by pretending that Buckhead was just some coincidental "find" by a random blogger in pajamas. The entire piece is a polarizing effort on Mr. Last and the Weekly Standard's part and I hate to see this disease come to the fine and trusted community that bloggers have created. This "Buckhead" development doesn't bode well for bloggers' trust in fellow bloggers, and that's a shame.
The Dan Rather incident has left scars upon the blogging community as well as deserved scars on CBS' inept journalism in the case of those documents. (CBS was just as guilty for consorting with the likes of the partisan shadow-lurker
Bill Burkett).
I'm not a woman who jumps to conclusions easily. Although I previously did not seriously entertain this whole thing might be a Republican conspiracy, now it seems entirely plausible. It's only natural people will think this way. The incident may have garnered new attention toward the blogging community, but those of us who've been blogging a long time (with independence) do not take collaboration with the rightwing nexus lightly.