Sunday, June 13, 2004

Frum/Perle Beliefs Threaten the World

Frum/Perle Beliefs Threaten the World

~~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The Communists, by their own declaration, did not invade Hungary in 1956, or Czechoslovakia in 1968; they "liberated" these countries from evil. Frum and Perle have learned their lessons well."
~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


David Gordon systematically deconstructs the logic of Perle and Frum.

Frum and Perle have identified with great clarity a system of belief that threatens the world. This system requires all governments to conform to the policies of a single power. Those that refuse face violent overthrow. The ensuing military occupation by the dominant power is styled democracy; and, once people grasp its benefits, it is claimed that democracy of this sort will conquer the world.

[LINK-Ludwig von Mises Institute]



Saturday, June 12, 2004

UK Elections: Blair's party takes a beating

UK Elections: Blair's party takes a beating

Clare Short, the former international development secretary, has called on Tony Blair to stand aside after the Labour party suffered its worst 24 hours at the polling booths since the mid-70s.

Short has said:

"I think that the electorate is sending a message to Tony Blair because the Labour party is incapable of correcting him. What he did in Iraq has brought disgrace and dishonour on Britain around the world. As Tony Blair won't change the policy, the only way to make a correction is for him to step aside from the leadership."

[LINK-Guardian]

In Iraq Today

In Iraq Today

Bassam Salih Kubba gunned down
Was Iraq Ministry's most senior diplomat

The 60-year-old Kubba was a longtime diplomat, having served as acting chief the Iraqi mission to the United Nations and Iraq's ambassador to China. Kubba was the second senior Iraqi official to die in weeks. On May 17, Iraqi Governing Council head Izzadine Saleem was killed in a suicide car bombing near the U.S. military headquarters in Baghdad.

Three hostages were butchered by insurgents..one Lebanese hostage and two locals working for a foreign company in Iraq.

[LINK]

Shia Cleric Muqtada al-Sadr gives Iraqi government conditional support
An aide told the Arab television station Al-Arabiya that al-Sadr would cooperate with the new government if it worked to end the U.S. military presence in the country.

[LINK]


In Sadr City

On Friday in Sadr City, one Mahdi Army militiaman was killed and several others were wounded in clashes with American forces in Sadr City, Baghdad. A Sadrist clergyman, Shaikh Nasir al-Sa'idi, preaching at the al-Hikmah mosque, warned nations considering joining the multinational force in Iraq that they will be treated the same way the present occupiers are treated.

[LINK]

In Kufa

At the Friday prayers at the Kufa Mosque, Shaikh Jabir al-Khafaji preached in the stead of Muqtada al-Sadr, reading the latter's prepared sermon for the third week in a row. During the sermon, he mentioned that Muqtada al-Sadr would support the caretaker government if it demanded a timetable for the withdrawal of Occupation forces from Iraq. He emphasized his "refusal to kowtow to the Occupiers."

In Najaf

On Thursday and early Friday, Mahdi Army militiamen looted and burned a Najaf police station after the police attempted to arrest an aide to Muqtada al-Sadr. Although US-installed Najaf governor Adnan Zurufi accused the Mahdi Army of breaking the truce, it is hard to see how the attempted arrest was consistent with a truce. Zurufi is probably egged on in these matters by Paul Bremer and the Coalition Provisional Authority, but note that the US offered him no help on Friday. I think it is a legitimate demand that militias not appear in the streets armed. I'm not sure trying to arrest Muqtada's aides is so legitimate.

--Juan Cole

[LINK]

Food for Thought

A 6/19/2003 report by Juan Cole on the cancellation of planned municipal elections in Najaf was particularly painful for Professor Roger Myerson of the University of Chicago to reread from today's perspective. He wrote recently:

"You [meaning Prof. Cole] reported then that local US officials believed "Najaf was ready for elections and that the theocrats would have done poorly." But even if the Sadrists had won the election, their movement may have developed very differently over the past year if they could have built their political power by spending public funds for local reconstruction, rather than by recruiting soldiers for armed resistance."

Friday, June 11, 2004

Larry Sabato on parallels between 1980 and 2004

Larry Sabato on parallels between 1980 and 2004

Joe Gandelman brought this new article by the University of Virginia's Larry Sabato to my attention (Thanks,Joe).

[LINK HERE-A LESSON PLAN FROM THE GREAT COMMUNICATOR]

Mr. Sabato's asking if this week's look back upon the Reagan years provided us with any insight about the 2004 Presidential campaign. He focuses on 1980, the year when Ronald Reagan achieved what observers at the time thought unlikely.

As the road to the 1980 election narrowed, Mr. Sabato points to these historical
mile-markers:

Foreign policy seemed a mess.

Americans were unhappy about the economy.

Our primary international enemy (the the USSR) appeared to be on the march and achieving major goals.

A sizeable majority of voters said the country was seriously off on the wrong track and
questioned whether the incumbent President and his team were competent enough to handle the myriad challenges before them.

An independent candidate for President added to the confusion of the election.

The country as a whole was uncertain what to do.

In 1980, it was pretty much a dead heat between Carter and Reagan up until October, yet at campaign's end, everything came together for Reagan.

It goes to show us all that you never know what might happen..and this whole 2004 race just might come down to the fates. I think Mr. Sabato is dead-on-target when he comments:

Had Carter managed to free the hostages just forty-eight hours before the election, it is conceivable that he could have managed to win a narrow reelection. Surely, both George Bush and John Kerry are waiting with bated breath to see if certain events in late October (the capture of Osama bin Laden, a terrorist act on American soil, a fresh disaster in Iraq) will swing the election one way or the other.


Though some people may think a happy resolution of the hostage situation wouldn't have quickly erased the public's memory of the long gas-lines and the inflation of Carter's unfortunate political time, I think they would be off-the mark. The public is easily swayed by such events poured out over their TV screens like high drama with heart-wrenching music and happy tears of relieved family members. Levers would have been pulled for Carter had fate smiled upon him.

Fate never smiled on Carter that year. Reagan eventually (boldly and illegally) defied fate and decided to cast his sails with the political winds at his back by selling arms to Iran for the release of those hostages.

If Osama bin Laden is caught in October, CNN and FOX will surely create the 24/7 drumbeat..the sappy movie-quality dramatics, music and all...and the dynamics of Election 2004 could greatly change... leaning toward an easy Bush victory. As long as bin Laden remains at large, however, America is reminded how pointless and unnecessary the violent Iraq war really has been.

Mr. Sabato wonders if John Kerry might not win by a landslide if this set of seven points still holds true on November 2nd.

I happen to think there's going to be a hell of a lot of violence and death in Iraq this summer. I hope I'm wrong, but i don't expect I will be. Bush will lay the blame and responsibility on the Iraqis, since they're now "in charge" (cough-cough). I don't think the public will buy it, but who knows? The public's been fooled many times by the misleading Bushites. They seem to accept many of the lies without question. Will they willingly accept many more troops killed as a civil war rages in Iraq? (A recent LA Times poll indicates that a majority of Americans now thinks it was not worthwhile going to war in Iraq).

Outsourcing was not a major issue in 1980. Have any Americans been watching Lou Dobbs? Will they be patient while their jobs continue to leave their small towns as their state taxes rise? Does Kerry promise them any relief?

There was no fear of E-vote theft in 1980...and there hadn't been a stolen (ahem--Supreme Court-assigned) election in 1976. A lot of 2000-Gore voters are just waiting to prepare their ballots very carefully and correctly this time. Will Diebold be capable of giving us an honest vote-tally? Why should we trust them knowing their CEO promised to "deliver" Ohio to Bush?

What about the Saudi promise to lower those gas prices for Bush just before the election?

I think this country, as a whole today, is more certain of what to do than in 1980. The problem is, there is a Grand Canyon-sized gap between those people.

The irresponsible party-before-country (pig-headed) leadership in Washington is perfectly reflective of the gap. Last summer we saw Rep Bill Thomas call the police on his fellow statesmen. That gave the phrases "beyond the pale" and "over the top" entirely new meanings.

I don't think we're going to see any landslides unless Bush totally screws up.

(I can't believe I'm saying that--because I personlly do think that President Bush has already screwed up--far past my own political tolerance-point....yet I understand he has loyal and fierce supporters who practically live to see skeptics such as myself shut up and/or shut away.)

Note- See Joe's latest--Will the Bush Campaign's Use of Reagan Imagery Prove A Double-Edged Sword?

You can also see Joe over at Dean's World this week.

It's A Shame About Ray

It's A Shame About Ray

I'm not talking about Evan Dando's Lemonheads.

I'm talking about Ray Charles.



I think "You Don't Know Me" was my favorite song by Ray.

I'll never forget the warm night in June when I heard him sing 'Georgia' live from the stage at Jazz Fest in Clinton Square.

Man, I'm sorry to see him go...


Funeral Over-Maybe we'll get some real news now?

The Funeral's Over
Maybe we'll get some real news now?


Quote of the day:


"The great American news industry, the Pekinese of the Press with so much room and time and nothing to say, compared Reagan to Lincoln and Hamilton, they really did. This is like claiming that the maintenance man wrote the Bill of Rights."

--Jimmy Breslin

[LINK]



Charles Krauthammer on Optimism, Liberals and Reagan

Charles Krauthammer on Optimism, Liberals and Reagan

Charles Krauthammer cannot abide any liberal person's praise of former President Reagan, it seems.

[SEE LINK-REAGAN REVISIONISM]

Crediting President Reagan for his fine ability to inspire the average American is just not good enough. If you don't agree with Reagan's ideology lock, stock, and barrel, then I'm sorry, dear reader...Charles says you are a damned phoney.

I submit to you that Mr. Krauthammer sounds like a wounded little child who wishes to keep Reagan in his pocket for his selfish little self and won't let you hold him..even for just a moment.

Reagan belonged to all Americans and we can say anything we truly believe, if we believe the Bill of Rights. Of course, that doesn't mean idiots like Mr. Krauthammer won't try to prove us liars.

Now, I don't begrudge Mr. Krauthammer his own opinion. When he takes others' opinions and turns around to call the others fakes and liars, he only comes off appearing infantile, ill-mannered, and disrespectful....which is a terrible flaw in character I find common in many right-wing ideologues today.


'Vindicated' by history?

Mr. Krauthammer says:

"Rarely has a president been so quickly and completely vindicated by history."

Vindicated?
History isn't over yet.

With no disrespect intended toward former President Reagan, if history was at its end, you could twist your facts around and turn even a farceur into a permanent mythical hero...but you'd know you'd have to ignore and omit many other facts. That, my friends, is what you call revision...which is exactly what Mr. Krauthammer is accusing liberals of doing (while doing a bang-up job himself). What a futile exercise.

We're looking back at Reagan from a narrow lens..all that will stem from Reagan's actions (or lack thereof) is yet to be.

I'm not sure about Mr. Krauthammer, but I know what I saw on September 11, 2001. The rest of you readers saw it happen, did you not?

If Mr. Krauthammer believes the murderous event that shook America in utter defeat at the hands of a popular Muslim fundamentalist leader on that autumn morning in New York City is disconnected from Ronald Reagan's failure (by his negotiating with the fundamental terrorists of Iran rather than stand morally strong) and from Reagan's failure to understand the future of the post-Cold-war world (especially after seeing 241 Marines suicide-bombed and Pan Am 103 in pieces on the Scotland ground), then I think Krauthammer had better think it out again.


Reagan's 'new peace'?

Mr. Krauthammer says:

"His policies of unrelenting toughness won the Cold War and brought a new peace."

A new peace.

September 11, 2001. That's all I can say about Reagan's new peace.


Bush 43 could never come close to Reagan's uniting abilities

Mr. Krauthammer mockingly discounts optimism in his column and I realize that's exactly what is missing in right-wingers today.

At the funeral service today, Margaret Thatcher talked about Reagan's grace under pressure..about Reagan's wit, faith, and optimism. It's a shame to see Mr. Krauthammer discounting such wonderful character traits.

GW Bush should have such abilities. He doesn't, though. He's far more like dead wood.

Reagan, through his abilty to inspire, was a brilliant figurehead.
Compare that to Bush--the wooden cigar-store Indian that cannot come up with an eloquent reply to an impromptu question from the press.

If Reagan was an "amiable dunce" (not my words), that would make G.W. Bush is a "non-amiable dunce", hostile to those who do not share his ideology (my words). Reagan was a capable uniter, even while pushing an ugly agenda of greed. Bush is a divider in the world and in his own country.

Perhaps that's why Krauthammer cannot abide a liberal's praise for a former President's graceful wit. He knows the current right-wing oaf in office will never win on "grace".

Who is the dissembler and a revisionist when it comes to an open discussion about Reagan, really?

In section 59 of Arlington National Cemetery, near the graves of 21 American soldiers killed by a suicide bomber in the line of duty in Beirut, there is a cedar tree with this marker:

LET PEACE TAKE ROOT
THIS CEDAR OF LEBANON TREE GROWS IN LIVING MEMORY OF THE AMERICANS KILLED IN THE BEIRUT TERRORIST ATTACK AND ALL VICTIMS OF TERRORISM THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.



Do you think I'm being a phoney, readers?

What Have We Become? Ret. Naval Officer Speaks

What Have We Become?
A Retired Naval Officer Speaks

Sen. James Inhofe, Rep. Duncan Hunter, Rush Limbaugh, Kate O'Beirne, President Bush are named as some of the leaders in a zealot's parade.

Doesn't it ever occur to those zealots that something we do can be terribly wrong even if something else, somewhere else, is worse? I am very afraid that even that thin line will soon become so blurred we will be inured to anything, all in the name of patriotism.

I say this with the full knowledge that I'll be accused of "blaming America first." In this age of instant awareness of everything that goes on in the world, too many of us insist on being unaware of what some of us are becoming.

--Keith Taylor, retired officer, U.S. Navy

[LINK-Online Journal]



Newsmax is proudly encouraging censorship

Newsmax is proudly encouraging censorship

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but I see the folks at Newsmax do not wish for Americans to be free to consider views alternative to theirs.

The spirit of censorship by a market force within our capitalistic political structure, my dear readers, is what it means to be anti-American...to run against the Bill of Rights.

Our troops defend freedom in wars promoted by these market forces, yet the markets are not promoting freedom.

In this manner, they betray the troops with false sermons about what it means to be American.

I'm American, and so is Michael Moore.

Michael Moore isn't an alien enemy. He's an American with a story to tell.

Newsmax is claiming they don't want Moore to "profit" from his film, but we know what they really do not want is for too many Americans to hear the "other side of the story".

The man who's leading the charge is Mr. Howard Kaloogian, the same fellow who made history as Chairman of the Recall Gray Davis Committee.

Kaloogian talks a pretty talk about supporting the troops, but he falls flat on his ass when it comes to promoting the spirit of a truly free America. He has "AGENDA" written all over his false face.

Newsmax is free to help Mr. Kaloogian try to recruit people to speak out in anger, but in the end, what they hope for is market-censorship of "Fahrenheit 9/11".

Freedom is freedom.

Censorship is censorship.

The forces behind the market known as "Newsmax" are trying to control the political system. They know the election is fast-approaching and their obvious agenda is damaged every time an American hears hidden truths.

America is a nation of non-market-based individuals (sometimes known as humans) born to the hope of freedom in a nation born with and raised on The Declaration of Independence.

Newsmax does not represent freedom in the spirit of our Founding Fathers.

They're much closer to acting as market-fascists with their censorship-crusade.
[LINK]

UPDATE:

See Max Blumenthal June 14, 2004

Thursday, June 10, 2004

Wednesday, June 09, 2004

Iraq Pipeline Hit Will Cause Electricity Interruptions


You're looking at the latest hit by saboteurs on a key northern oil pipeline Wednesday, forcing a 10 percent cut on the Iraqi national power grid as demand for electricity rises with the advent of Iraq's broiling summer heat.

Chant along with me: "...hearts and minds.....hearts and minds.."


[LINK]

Hannity and Colmes-A worthless show

Hannity and Colmes-
A worthless show

Look at this conversation with guest Ted Rall. Lots of false morality, ugly hubris, desperate and defensive argument...nothing but meaningless tripe from all sides. It's nothing but pablum for the politically retarded. This is what's killing civility in America. I think Alan Colmes is the biggest puke of all, perhaps, for his line of questioning and sickeningly fake moral-posturing from the get-go. It set the tone for censoring Mr. Rall before he was allowed to utter one word.

These two a**wipes will remain on the air as long as their hateful, politically-slow audience chooses to swim and drown in their dribbling infantile-emotion-level pool of drool.

Poor, poor America.

Joel Mowbray: State Dept- Hating Weasel

Joel Mowbray:
State Department-Hating Weasel

When a writer is on a one-trick-pony crusade against the State Department.. and when he goes as wacko-far as accusing a major mainstream news publication of being "controlled" by the State Department.....and when his paranoid complaint is featured in a right-wing-leaning Washington newspaper...and when he'd defend a Neocon and a deceitful embezzling crook over good men and women within his own government....and when the writer has been a guest on Pat Robertson's ("nuke Foggy Bottom") show more than at the credible political media outlets...

...he might be nothing more than a State-Department-hating weasel.

*..and his credibility is going down the toilet along with the chickenhawks he defends...and he knows it. Smearing General Zinni hasn't helped Mowbray to look pro-American..*

[LINK]

Iyad Illawi helped CIA; Conducted bombing campaigns which killed kids

Iyad Illawi helped CIA; Conducted bombing campaigns which killed kids

Iraq's newly appointed Prime Minister Iyad Allawi apparently has blood on his hands..schoolchildren included. Please explain to me...how is bombing a crowded movie theater NOT acting as a terrorist? Would YOU want a leader who'd killed schoolchildren? What if you knew he wasn't even ashamed of his terrorist actions? It's pretty disgusting to think he's acting Prme Minister in Iraq right now. Our CIA was in on these bombings and sabotage beside Allawi in the early 90s. When Allawi was picked as interim prime minister, he said his first priority would be 'to improve the security situation by stopping bombings and other insurgent attacks in Iraq'...an idea several former officials familiar with his past said they found "ironic."

Why can't we ever choose someone "clean"? Conscientious? Decent? Moral? I think it's because we don't WANT a 'nice guy' to lead Iraqis to "freedom". Apparently ,we prefer the fellows with barbaric tendencies. Wasn't Saddam a barbarian, too? We're settling for a nicer barbarian, already?

*WE didn't choose him, you say?
B.S. we didn't!*

[LINK]

Update June 11, 2004:
Sunni preacher Shaikh Ahmad al-Samarra'i accused Prime Minister Iyad Allawi of being an American agent in his sermon on Friday. He addressed Allawi from the pulpit, saying, "Have all noble persons disappeared, that you have come and sought assistance from foreigners?"
[LINK]

Ken Burns Addresses Yale

Ken Burns Addresses Yale

"...there is nothing more incredible than being a witness to history."



Because filmmaker Ken Burns has been a chief inspiration to me in creating this blog, I wish to share some of his advice to graduating Yale students in his May 23rd commencement speech:


So what do we make of all this? Let me speak directly to the graduating class.

(Watch out, here comes the advice.)


As you pursue your goals in life, that is to say your future, pursue your past. Let it be your guide. Insist on having a past and then you will have a future.

Do not descend too deeply into specialism in your work. Educate all your parts. You will be healthier. Replace cynicism with its old-fashioned antidote, skepticism.

Don't confuse success with excellence. The poet Robert Penn Warren, who taught here at Yale for many years, once told me that "careerism is death."



Travel. Do not get stuck in one place. Visit Yellowstone or Yosemite or Appomattox, where our country really came together. Whatever you do, walk over the Brooklyn Bridge. Listen to jazz music, the only art form Americans have ever invented, and a painless way, Wynton Marsalis reminds us, “of understanding ourselves.”

Give up addictions. Try brushing your teeth tonight with the other hand. Try even remembering what I just asked you.

Insist on heroes. And be one.

Read. The book is still the greatest manmade machine of all -- not the car, not the TV, not the computer, I promise.

Write: write letters. Keep journals. Besides your children, there is no surer way of achieving immortality. Remember, too, there is nothing more incredible than being a witness to history.

Serve your country. Insist that we fight the right wars. Convince your government that the real threat comes from within, as Lincoln said. Governments always forget that. Do not let your government outsource honesty, transparency, or candor. Do not let your government outsource democracy. Steel yourselves. Steel yourselves. Your generation will have to repair this damage. And it will not be easy.

Insist that we support science and the arts, especially the arts. They have nothing to do with the actual defense of our country -- they just make our country worth defending.

Do only, as Emerson suggests, whatever “inly rejoices.” Do not lose your enthusiasm. In its Greek etymology, the word enthusiasm means, “God in us.” Remember, most of all, that only love multiplies.



Mr. Burns also offered inspirational, educated, and critical (yet necessary) comments about the civil state of America today. It would behoove all of us..beginning with our leaders..to heed Ken Burns' sage advice:


The great jurist Learned Hand (and could there be a better name for a judge than Learned Hand?) once said that, “Liberty is never being too sure you're right.” Somehow, recently though, we have replaced our usual and healthy doubt with an arrogance and belligerence that resembles more the ancient and now fallen empires of our history books than a modern compassionate democracy; begun to start wars instead of finishing them; begun to depend on censorship and intimidation and to infringe on the most basic liberties that have heroically defined and described our trajectory as a nation of free people; begun to reduce the complexity of modern life into facile judgments of good and evil, and now find ourselves brought up short when we see that we have, too, sometimes, in moments, become what we despise.

It is easy, I am sure, during these times of international upheaval and titanic change everywhere, to, like an ostrich, retreat inward, to retire to our spiritually as well as physically gated communities, to smugly convince ourselves that we in this country have somehow triumphantly made it through, that our destiny as a people, a society, a nation is now assured. That, like some perpetual motion machine, we will go on forever.

Nothing could be more dangerous than this arrogant belief, brought on and amplified as it is by a complete lack of historical awareness among us, and further reinforced by a modern media, cloaked in democratic slogans, but dedicated to the most stultifying kind of consumer existence, convincing us to worship gods of commerce and money and selfish advancement above all else.



“There are grave doubts at the hugeness of the land,” Henry Adams wrote, “and whether one government can comprehend the whole.” It is a perfect quote, accurately conveying the anxiety of Americans in the middle of the 19th Century who feared that this collection of former colonies could ever expand to continental status, could ever deal as one nation with the sectional discord that threatened civil war, could, as Adams put it so well, “comprehend the whole.”

Civil war did come, yet the phrase “the United States are,” as we referred to ourselves plurally before the war, paradoxically morphed after the war into a singular “the United States is” that we still, ungrammatically, refer to today.

But, alas, today we find ourselves in the midst of a new, subtler, perhaps more dangerous, civil war. The first one proved, above all, that a minority view could not secede politically or geographically from this union.

Now we are poised to fight that war again, and perhaps again and again, this time culturally, where the threat is fundamentalism wherever it raises its intolerant head. The casualties this time will be our sense of common heritage, our sense of humor, our sense of balance and cohesion. The ultimate stakes, though, are just as great as those Abraham Lincoln faced--the Union and very survival of our country.

What we are seeing is a secession of ideas and identification from the mainstream. In the name of the truth, we have created an infinite number of different truths, all pulling in different directions, all oblivious to the old or even a new conception of the whole. The historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. said that we suffer today from "too much pluribus and not enough unum."

Our first Civil War started, as the writer Shelby Foote says, because we failed to do what we Americans do best: compromise. "We like to think of ourselves as uncompromising people," he said, "but our genius is for compromise and when that broke down, we started killing each other." The lesson for us, today, is tolerance and the mitigating wisdom that sees beyond the dialectical preoccupation that has set each individual, each group, each region of the country, against the whole.

So, I ask those of you graduating tomorrow, male or female, black or white or brown or yellow, young or old, straight or gay, to become soldiers in a new Union Army, an army dedicated to the preservation of this country's great ideals, a vanguard against this new separatism and disunion, a vanguard against those who, in the name of our great democracy, have managed to diminish it.

This is a family problem. Our problem. Not a red state or a blue state problem.

Our problem.



I'm not sure if my readers have seen the AP article that followed Mr. Burns' speech:



Filmmaker Ken Burns Criticizes Bush at Yale as President Arrives for Daughter's Party
By Diane Scarponi--Associated Press, 05/23/04

NEW HAVEN, Conn. -- With presidential security helicopters circling over the Yale University campus, filmmaker Ken Burns denounced the war in Iraq on Sunday and told graduating seniors to remember history as they work to repair divides in American culture.

President Bush came to the campus for a private reception with his daughter, Barbara, who graduates from Yale on Monday. Bush did not hold any public events, and Barbara skipped Sunday's baccalaureate services and the day-before-graduation senior Class Day festivities where Burns spoke.

While Bush was not in public view, his presidency was a hot topic of rhetoric at Class Day.

Without mentioning Bush by name, Burns drew parallels between today's political leaders and the Iraq war, versus Abraham Lincoln and the Civil War, which he chronicled in an award-winning film series.

Both wars threatened to tear the country apart, Burns said.

"Steel yourselves. Your generation must repair this damage, and it will not be easy," Burns told the seniors.

Burns quoted famed jurist Learned Hand as saying, "Liberty is never being too sure you're right."

"Somehow recently, though, we have replaced our usual and healthy doubt with an arrogance and belligerence that resembles more the ancient and now fallen empires of our history books than a modern compassionate democracy," Burns said, to applause from the 1,300 graduates and their families and friends.

He criticized what he called a culture of censorship and intimidation that was intolerant of others, as well as a compliant media and a consumer culture that values the pursuit of money above everything.

"We have begun to reduce the complexities of modern life into the facile judgments of good and evil, and now find ourselves brought up short when we see that we have, too, some times and moments, become what we despise," Burns said.

Burns noted that it is tempting in such times to turn inward and ignore outside troubles, but he urged the seniors to reject that impulse and study history as a way to cope with these troubles and to figure out what to do about them.

"If you don't know where you've been, how can you possibly know who you are and where you're going?" Burns asked.

(see link for more)
---------------------------------------------------------

[LINK]


Congratulations to Mr. Burns daughter, Sarah, who was one of the graduating students at Yale.



Unlike Nancy Reagan, Laura Bush Chooses to Remain in Dark Ages

Unlike Nancy Reagan, Laura Bush Chooses to Remain in Dark Ages


The dismal fact is: She's locking all of us in with her.

I consider this to be the saddest affront to the memory of President Ronald W. Reagan...
perpetrated by the current President who wishes to leech onto Reagan's legacy.

In essence, Laura Bush is saying: "I lost my father to this debilitating illness with no cure, now you and all Americans must suffer the same fate.. Oh, but I will admire you for slaving over your loved one as you watch them suffer and wither hopelessly before your eyes."

[LINK]

Cartoon

Bush Administration Has Waffled Terribly on Peacekeeping

Bush Administration Has Waffled Terribly on Peacekeeping

"I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building...I think what we need to do is convince people who live in the lands they live in to build the nations. Maybe I'm missing something here. I mean, we're going to have a kind of nation-building corps from America? Absolutely not."

--GW Bush, Presidential debate, Oct. 11, 2000, in Winston-Salem, N.C.



What we've witnessed with the Bush administration is "peace on the cheap"...because peace was not properly valued.

Before the Iraq war, the Peacekeeping Institute at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., was "just one more vestige of the Clinton years that Donald Rumsfeld intended to consign to the dustbin of history"*.

This administration has learned important lessons far too late. While trying to be ahead of times, they endangered our chances for success in Iraq. They endangered the lives of our troops. We need to toss them out on their incompetent rears in November.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published April 15, 2003

Army institute to be shut down
Critics hit loss of training center for peacekeeping
Rumsfeld supports closing

By Douglas Holt
Tribune staff reporter

[LINK]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published July 8, 2003

Peacekeeping Institute to Stay Open

[LINK]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published September, 2003

Peacekeeping revisited, again
The ‘p’ word gets another look

By Michael Moran
Senior correspondent MSNBC

[LINK]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published November, 2003

Iraq provides Peacekeeping Institute with needed boost


...to save money and get more active duty officers serving with troops in the field, the Army announced in January that the Peacekeeping Institute would shut down -- despite ongoing U.S. peacekeeping operations in Kosovo and Afghanistan and, at the time, a looming war in Iraq.

"The war college was told it had to cut 64 slots, and our 10 were among them," said Col. Michael Dooley

Critics figured that the decision had more to do with the distaste for U.S. "nation-building" frequently expressed by President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

The institute also has a new name, to reflect its broadened mission. It now is known as the Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute

[LINK]



Published: Jun 9, 2004

United States Pushes G-8 Plan to Train 50,000 Peacekeepers for Africa, Elsewhere

By John Leicester Associated Press Writer

[LINK]


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published June 9, 2004


Rumsfeld expresses interest in a new regional peacekeeping training institute styled as Bangladesh Institute of Peacekeeping Support Operations Training

Staff Writer
Daily Star

[LINK]

Political Compass

Take This Test!


Political Compass

The social dimension of politics is important. That's the dimension that the mere left-right scale doesn't adequately address. So Political Compass has added one, ranging in positions from extreme authoritarian to extreme libertarian.

My result was here:




Close to this fellow:


NOTE: Don't spoil the results by reading the Analysis section before you take the test.

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

Lawyers Decided Bans on Torture Didn't Bind Bush

Lawyers Decided Bans on Torture Didn't Bind Bush

This is a powerful piece. It shows that administration lawyers made a conscious decision to allow Bush and his administration to get away with open-ended definitions of torture and escape international legal scrutiny. A March memo view is in direct conflict with the position the administration has taken in U.S. Supreme Court regarding Constitutional protections for prisoners.

When too much power is afforded to people who can easily abuse it, we shouldn't be surprised if and when we find ourselves well outside the realm of the rule of law.

A team of administration lawyers concluded in a March 2003 legal memorandum that President Bush was not bound by either an international treaty prohibiting torture or by a federal antitorture law because he had the authority as commander in chief to approve any technique needed to protect the nation's security.

The memo, prepared for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, also said that any executive branch officials, including those in the military, could be immune from domestic and international prohibitions against torture for a variety of reasons...

The March memorandum...is the latest internal legal study to be disclosed that shows that after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks the administration's lawyers were set to work to find legal arguments to avoid restrictions imposed by international and American law.

...lawyers who drafted the torture memo in March could face professional sanctions.

[LINK-NYT}


Today, Attorney General John Ashcroft, without offering sound reason, said he would not discuss the contents of the Justice and Pentagon memos, and would not turn over the Justice memo to the committee.

I believe it is essential to the operation of the executive branch that the president have the opportunity to get information from the attorney general that is confidential," he said.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) and Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) warned Ashcroft that his refusal might place him in contempt of Congress.

[LINK-NYT]


UPDATE-June 9:

Washington Post Editorial- LEGALIZING TORTURE

Perhaps the president's lawyers have no interest in the global impact of their policies -- but they should be concerned about the treatment of American servicemen and civilians in foreign countries.


Washington Post-Memo on Torture Draws Focus to Bush ; Aide Says President Set Guidelines for Interrogations, Not Specific Techniques

Josh Marshall Commentary (Josh is an intuitive pundit; consistently ahead of the curve.)

Now, we know that presidents sometimes break laws and they frequently bend them, if only in cases where the laws don't seem to anticipate a situation the president finds himself confronting. There is even an argument that the president can refuse to enforce laws he deems unconstitutional.

But there is no power inherent in the president simply to set aside the law.



General Batiste Visits Baquba

General Batiste Visits Baquba

Baquba and Col. Dana Pittard, for me, have become the symbol of the best model of possible success in Iraq. May the men and women of the Third Brigade see continued positivity from the hopeful people of that city. God knows- it isn't going to be a cakewalk. A suicide bomb near Baquba killed at least one U.S. soldier today. I credit no small part of any acheived success in Baquba (which is about 30 miles north of Baghdad)to Col. Pittard, a true gentleman in a war of twisted motives where gentleman hardly count.

Mostly, I hope these troops will soon be able to leave Iraq..a place they never should have and never needed to have been sent to begin with.

The general said that of all the cities under his watch, Baquba, 35 miles northeast of Baghdad, was the most willing to work with the Americans. Col. Dana J. H. Pittard, the brigade commander, said he expanded the provincial council last week to 40 members from 29 to make it more inclusive.

But Baquba still has a strong Sunni guerrilla movement, and insurgents have killed some local leaders, including a communist member of the provincial council and a district police chief. Insurgents have tried twice to kill the governor, Colonel Pittard said.

[LINK-NYT]


AlJazeera Spreads Propaganda About U.S.

AlJazeera Spreads Propaganda About U.S.

Oh, man..just look at this propaganda....

{LINK-A Letter From Baghdad - US Soldier "Media dont tell the whole story"]

Iraq -U.N. and CPA Updates

Iraq -U.N. and CPA Updates

It's good to see the United Nations getting involved again. John Negroponte says Iraq's sovereignty will be "undiluted" (whatever the hell that means when it comes to the big picture).

There has been no commitment (or discussions) for troops from other U.N. countries right now, but I think they'd have to be insane to want to commit troops at this juncture. Security has been so badly bungled by Rumsfeld and Co...if anyone expects instantaneous stability, they need their heads examined. The coalition needs at least 500,000 troops to bring peace to Iraq, according to military analysts including Christopher Langton of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, a London-based defense consultant.

There's still a problem of legitimacy with the Iraqi people themselves. While Bush can claim a victory with the U.N. resolution, the resolution will have little effect on the ground, as Simon Kitchen, Middle East analyst for the Eurasia Group has said. This new interim government can sign contracts and discuss debt, but still have a lot of problems because most Iraqis don't see it as legitimate. [LINK-Bloomberg News]

It doesn't help that Paul Bremer has signed an order banning Muqtada al-Sadr and his lieutenants from running for elective office for 3 years because of their membership in an illegal militia. al-Sadr and his supporters have rejected this decree, saying that the CPA and the interim government have no right to make such decisions. [LINK-Guardian]

Juan Cole says:



Bremer's action in excluding the Sadrists from parliament is one final piece of stupidity to cap all the other moronic things he has done in Iraq. The whole beauty of parliamentary governance is that it can hope to draw off the energies of groups like the Sadrists. Look at how parliamentary bargaining moderated the Shiite AMAL party in Lebanon, which had a phase as a terrorist group in the 1980s but gradually outgrew it...

The only hope for dealing with the Sadrists nonviolently was to entice them into civil politics.. Now that they have been excluded from the political process and made outlaws in the near to medium term, we may expect them to act like outlaws and to be spoilers in the new Iraq.

[LINK-Informed Comment]

Dems, GOP give each other the 'Dutch' rub

Dems, GOP Give Each Other the 'Dutch' rub



Republican aides dredged up comments by [John] Kerry which were unflattering to Mr Reagan in the '80s...

Democrats retaliated with statements by [George] Bush Sr. in 1980, when he ran against Mr Reagan for the Republican nomination.

[LINK-Guardian]

In House bill: Churches to be freed to preach Word of Bush?

In House bill: Churches to be freed to preach Word of Bush?

Not only is the House trying to free the churches to put politics in their pulpits, they're doing it in a downright sneaky manner.

Representative Bill Thomas(the same cordial gent who called the fuzz on his fellow House reps last summer) has snuck the measure into a larger bill introduced to Committee last Friday.

Rev. Barry Lynn (of Americans United for Separation of Church and State) says 'no way'.

Paul Weyrich (of the Free Congress Foundation) imagines it's the best way..perhaps the only way.. to ensure a Bush re-election.

The House, in true partisan form, is going with Weyrich's idea.

Push the Federal Marriage Amendment--fire up the Christian fundamentalists. Get the fire and damnation mouths a-rumblin' and a-roarin'. Get all those millions of missing evangelicals to show up at the polls…along with untold millions of "traditional" Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, Missouri and Wisconsin synod Lutherans... and, oh.. those Episcopalians!

Vote for Bush or go to Hell and all other venues of vaguely related tarnation.

Monday, June 07, 2004

adventures/confessions saint augustine bear

See the Venus Transit tomorrow!

See the Venus Transit tomorrow!



"There will be no other till the twenty-first century of our era has dawned upon the Earth and the June flowers are blooming in 2004. What will be the state of science - God only knows."

1882 -- William Harkness, U.S. Naval Observatory

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A rare celestial event, one not seen by any person now alive. On June 8, the planet Venus will appear to cross in front of the Sun as seen from Earth. The last "Venus transit" occurred more than a century ago, in 1882, and was used to compute the distance from the Earth to the Sun.

DON'T MISS IT! [LINK1]
[LINK2]

Predictions/times to witness the transit in your city

Time To Leave Iraq - from The Nation

Time to Leave
from TheNation.com

Listen to what the Iraqis are telling us---give them back their country... and leave.
[LINK}

Reagan, Terror, and Bush

Reagan, terror, and Bush


With Ronald Reagan as President, America felt optimistically safe to see the world in black and white. These days, as a New York Times editorial stated, "gray is beginning to look a lot more attractive".

Reminiscing with my own mother, she recalled one of the darker moments of the Reagan presidency...his decision to send our Marines to Lebanon. I recall my mother weeping that morning in October, 1983 when she learned over 240 Marines were killed by Middle-eastern terrorists.


the Reagan era brought its share of terror victims.


I also recall having Syracuse University basketball game tickets in my hand for a game to be played in late December, 1988. Just before the game came the news that terrorists connected with Libya had blown up a jet over Lockerbie, Scotland..killing 35 Syracuse University students who were coming home for the holidays. I attended that basketball game and will never forget the solemn silence which subdued the crowd that night. The terrorist bombing of Flight 103 was unquestionably an attack on the United States.*15 active-duty U.S. military members and at least 10 veterans of the United States Armed Forces and members of their families were among those who lost their lives in this tragedy.*



I implore you, dear readers, to research how President Reagan (and Bush 41 directly after him) responded to these acts of terror. I assure you that you'll find little prescience in the wisdom of whatever retaliatory moves were made by our then-President. Why did it take almost 20 years to do anything? Why was terror allowed to build up rather than to be broken down?

These acts of terror during the Reagan era were just a beginning. When I think back, I truly do not think our nation's response to these acts of terror were sufficient. Perhaps, if we'd acted with full responsibility in the 80's, there would have been no strong Osama Bin Laden to lead in 2001.

While I highly respected and liked President Reagan and trusted he was sincere in his motives, I think we should be careful in making a saint of this wonderful human being. In our big fears about Communism, I believe we fully missed the boat on the murderous treachery that would follow on the heels of its demise.

Perhaps President Reagan made us all a bit too optimistic. We went into a dreamful and exuberant "Me-decade" sleep.

Realism is criticized by some of today's NeoConservatives, but I've got to say, my dear readers, there is no more important time in American history than right here..right now for a realist to take the reins. Visionary speeches do no good when the facts on the ground are constantly working against you.

Gazing upon Utopia and shining cities on hills are lovely when the murderer isn't breathing down your neck.

I think Bush is a super-dumbed-down version of a Reagan-wannabe (without Reagan's natural gift of humor). Bush tries to imitate and emulate Reagan's historical successes. We need a clear-eyed realist who is his own man. (A man---or woman---who doesn't have to read from cue-cards and sound like a second-grader when he does). I'm sick of being faked out by cheap (and often seemingly-learning-disabled) imitations.

I believe that a good portion of the reason so many Americans have a visceral dislike for Bush is primarily due to the fact that they suspect they are far more intelligent than he is. It's frustrating when you don't share a man's ideology and you observe that he can barely squeeze three or four properly-pronounced words into one flowing sentence. Another reason for the Bush-disconnect is that so many Americans do not trust that Bush's motives are genuine. He's been caught lying to Americans too many times.

You didn't see the same distaste for Reagan, even though his ideology was oppositional to many.

We trusted Ronnie. He had a genuine-looking smile. He told us to be proud and we found something in his words to believe. He was witty..charming. He had many friends in this world..outside the borders of America. People in Europe tore down a wall with the help of his optimism. What a wonderful time for America...what a decent man.

He wasn't perfect, though. As many Christians joke, there was only one perfect man...and look what they did to him.

There were boats Reagan missed.

Ask the familes of any of these Americans and they'll tell you.

*Matthew Gross has some interesting commentary on Bush/Reagan and what Reagan's death might mean to the upcoming Presidential election.*

*There's a roundup of Reagan commentaries and farewells at Mahablog.

President Reagan: A poetic expression of love

President Reagan: A poetic expression of love

I don't think I have to repeat the news that he's gone.



What I choose to recall this morning is a part of what was President Reagan's heart..a part with which we can all identify.

He wrote this letter to Nancy on a Sunday..March 20, 1955.





Sunday, March 20, 1955


"My darling, here it is, our day. If we were home, we would have a fire and funnies. And we would hate anybody who called or dropped in.

As it is, I'm sitting here on the top of the sixth floor, beside a phony fireplace, looking out at a gray, wet sky, and listening to a radio play music not intended for one person alone.

"Nevertheless, I wouldn't trade the way I feel for the loneliness of those days when one place was like another, and it didn't matter how long I stayed away... with all the missing you there is still such a wonderful warmth in this loneliness.

Like looking forward to a bright, warm room, no matter how dark and cold it is at the moment, you know the room is there and waiting.

I love you so very much.

I don't want--I don't even mind that life made me wait so long to find you.

The waiting only made the finding sweeter.

I love you,
Ronnie"


[LINK]






Godspeed, Dutch.

Who was Elie Hobeika? Ask Karl Rove.

Who was Elie Hobeika?
Ask Karl Rove.




On September 15, 2001, just four days after the 9-11 attacks, CIA Director George Tenet provided President Bush with a Top Secret "Worldwide Attack Matrix"—a virtual license to kill targets deemed to be a threat to the United States in some 80 countries around the world. The Tenet plan, which was subsequently approved by Bush, essentially reversed the executive orders of four previous U.S. administrations that expressly prohibited political assassinations.

According to high level European intelligence officials, Bush's counselor, Karl Rove, used the new presidential authority to silence a popular Lebanese Christian politician [Elie Hobeika], who was planning to offer irrefutable evidence that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorized the massacre of hundreds of Palestinian men, women, and children in the Beirut refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla in 1982. In addition, Sharon provided the Lebanese forces who carried out the grisly task.

After announcing he was willing to testify against Sharon, Hobeika became fearful for his safety and began moves to leave Lebanon. Hobeika was not aware that his threats to testify against Sharon had triggered a series of fateful events that reached well into the White House and Sharon's office.

On January 24, 2002, Hobeika's car was blown up by a remote controlled bomb placed in a parked Mercedes along a street in the Hazmieh section of Beirut.....

It is noteworthy that the State Department's list of global terrorist incidents for 2002 worldwide failed to list the car bombing attack on Hobeika and his party. The White House wanted to ensure the attack was censored from the report. The reason was simple: the attack ultimately had Washington's fingerprints on it.

High level European intelligence sources now report that Karl Rove personally coordinated Hobeika's assassination. The hit on Hobeika employed Syrian intelligence agents. Syrian President Bashar Assad was trying to curry favor with the Bush administration in the aftermath of 9-11 and was more than willing to help the White House. In addition, Assad's father, Hafez Assad, had been an ally of Bush's father during Desert Storm, a period that saw Washington give a "wink and a nod" to Syria's occupation of Lebanon. Rove wanted to help Sharon avoid any political embarrassment from an in absentia trial in Brussels where Hobeika would be a star witness. Rove and Sharon agreed on the plan to use Syrian Military Intelligence agents to assassinate Hobeika. Rove saw Sharon as an indispensable ally of Bush in ensuring the loyalty of the Christian evangelical and Jewish voting blocs in the United States....



[LINK-Online Journal]


Prior thought about Hobieika:

--The Assassination of Elie Hobeika

--Elie Hobeika's Assassination: Covering Up the Secrets of Sabra and Shatilla

--BBC Profile

--Robert Fisk- The Man Who Would Testify Against Sharon Is Blown Up

--Dawn.com

--Michael Young commentary

--Stark Portrait of Sabra & Shatila & Sharon depicted in World Premier Film "2000 TERRORISTS"..

--Jafi.org Info on Kahan Commission

Iraq hostage Matt Maupin family statement

Iraq hostage Matt Maupin family statement


Where is Pfc. Keith Matthew Maupin?


I would hope none of us have forgotten that Pfc. Keith Matthew (Matt) Maupin, a 20-year-old Army reservist, has been held hostage by insurgents since April 9 somewhere in Iraq.

I don't see very much about Matt in the mainstream news.

The silence is absolutely deafening.



For those who haven't forgotten, a recent statement from Keith & Carolyn Maupin (parents of Matt):


The Maupin family would like to thank everyone for supporting all soldiers as well as our son, Spc. Matt Maupin. The Yellow Ribbon campaign for our soldiers has been truly amazing and our spirits are lifted each time we see a new yellow ribbon displayed. Please continue to keep the yellow ribbons flying and candles lit to light their way home. A special thanks to the many people who have brought meals, provided religious support, established websites and for the many campaigns and vigils throughout the community and country. The outpouring of support and sentiment towards our family has been incredible, from both the military and civilian community. The emails, letters, cards, and prayers continue to arrive daily with well wishes for the safety of our son. Each one has touched our heart deeply during this difficult time. Although Matt has been captured for some time, we continue to pray daily for his safe return and the safe return of all soldiers to their loved ones. Our faith will never diminish and we ask that you keep all soldiers in your prayers and wish them a safe and speedy return.

Keith and Carolyn Maupin


[LINK-ChannelCincinatti.com]


Sunday, June 06, 2004

Iraq Weekend Updates

Iraq Weekend Updates

Thursday:

Tom Clancy: "Is Wolfowitz working for our side?"
[LINK-Informed Comment]

*Note- see my own recent comments [LINK] about the seemingly anti-American activities by some of the NeoCons.*


Friday:

The situation in Iraq acutely threatens Israeli security
[LINK-Informed Comment];

Iran Leader Slams Caretaker Government in Iraq [LINK];
Iraq as Failed State [LINK]


Saturday:

5 US Troops Killed in Iraq, 5 wounded,New Accord in Najaf
[LINK-Informed Comment]

Sunday:

Sistani Meets Muqtada; Ceasefire Taking Hold
[LINK-Informed Comment]

Who Is Francis Brooke?

Who Is Francis Brooke?

--Ahmed Chalabi's right-hand man in Baghdad
--An American consultant
--An Iraqi National Congress lobbyist
--Worked with the shady Rendon group on the Iraq project, a London-based C.I.A.-funded program to influence global opinion on Saddam Hussein.
--An evangelical Christian
--Ex-CIA consultant
--A recent consultant for BKSH and Associates, a company run by Charlie Black, a Republican Party veteran.
--A man who has boasted of engineering the war on Iraq by providing the United States the "evidence" it was seeking on (apparently non-existent)weapons of mass destruction along with Saddam's supposed ties to terrorists.


Where is Francis Brooke now?

--It's thought he scrambled back to Washington D.C.

Who wants to know?

An Iraqi judge...Judge Zuhair Al-Maliky of the central criminal court in Baghdad, to be precise.

Why?

Francis Brooke allegedly obstructed the Iraqi police from conducting a legitimate raid on Ahmed Chalabi's place. They say Brooke stopped the Chalabi raid by telling the police they didn't have the legal power to do it because "he was an American and they were Iraqis."

Reports from Iran suggest Francis Brooke acted as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran, passing letters between the two governments, which do not have diplomatic relations.

Brooke is trying to pass the buck and blame it all on a fellow by the name of Arras Habib, who is Chalabi's security chief.

[LINK]


More on Francis Brooke:

--Telegraph: Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi
--Disinfopedia
--New Yorker- The Manipulator
--MSNBC- Chalabi-A questionable use of U.S. Funding
--Washington Post- Chalabi Aides Suspected of Spying for Iran; Raid at Leader's Home Targeted His Associates

Who Is John Israel?

Who Is John Israel?

[LINK]

Abu Ghraib Intelligence Soldier Describes Iraq Abuse in Detail

Abu Ghraib Intelligence Soldier Describes Iraq Abuse in Detail

[LINK]

Elvis chicken at Google Blog

Elvis chicken at Google Blog

I borrowed this recipe for fried chicken from Charlie Ayers at the Google Blog. It was a recipe he summoned up the nerve to extract from a southern cook named Robert Brown who had allegedly fried the stuff up for Elvis Presley at one point in time.
[LINK]

Buttermilk Fried Chicken Elvis Loved
*Google-sized portions; read all the way through to get the total amounts needed*

1/2 c thyme
1/4 c oregano
1/4 c basil
1/2 c onion powder
1/2 c garlic powder
1/2 c dry mustard
1/2 c paprika
1/4 c chili powder
1/2 c celery seed
2 Tbsp salt
1/2 c coriander
1/2 c cumin
1/3 c kosher salt
1/4 c cayenne pepper
1/2 c ground black pepper
1/4 c ground white pepper

3 gals. buttermilk
3 cases organic free range chicken (roughly 30 chickens, divided into 1.5- to 2-lb. sections)

Mix these amounts of the dry ingredients together in a large bowl, then whisk in the buttermilk until it's thoroughly mixed.

Pour the batter over the chickens and marinate for up to five days - keep refrigerated, of course.

For frying
Now mix another 4x the above dry ingredients, and add:
2 lbs. cornstarch
8 qts. all-purpose organic whole wheat flour

Dredge the marinated chicken pieces in the dry herbs/flour/cornstarch mixture mix.
Fry the dredged chicken in a large skillet with hot peanut oil @ 375 degrees. Once chicken has reached a golden brown color, finish cooking it in the oven.



Thanks for sharing, Charlie!

Tie-runn-eee

Tie-run-eee

Bush said today, in tribute to former President Reagan, that he had saved the world from an "era of fear and tyranny".

Ronald Reagan never would have pronounced the word 'TYRANNY' as TIE-RUNN-EEE.

Good heavens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"My father crapped bigger ones than George Bush."

--Ronald P. Reagan


Saturday, June 05, 2004

President Match

President Match


Go here to take the test.

My results were:

1. Kucinich Score: 90%


2. Kerry Score: 74%


3. Bush Score: 5%



Abu gah rabe abu gaaa rabe ahb ahb abuuuu gaaaaaah

Abu gah rabe abu gaaa rabe ahb ahb abuuuu gaaaaaah


Oh, please, please listen to this!
*..the first two minutes are all I'm asking!*

Friday, June 04, 2004

Col. Dana Pittard: A Gentleman Among Occupiers

Col. Dana Pittard: A Gentleman Among Occupiers

Army Col. Dana Pittard's name crossed my path again today. I've come to the conclusion that he is a gentleman.

Being a gentleman, even when faced with the hardest decisions, is a reflection of what I believe we're missing today in our American leaders. It's reassuring to know there are men like Dana Pittard on America's side.

With corresponding gentlemanly leadership in Washington D.C., I think this mission may have been a winning success by now. I realize now that this is the component we've been missing. There are few in the Bush administration that have acted with discernible grace as gentleman. The greater world knows it and has reacted accordingly by leaving us, for the better part, to our own (ugly) political devices in Iraq. They see we've made our own disgraceful bed, and it's in that bed we sleep while men like Dana Pittard put a decent face on some downright indecent policies.

I am convinced Col. Pittard is doing his personal best for this country. I pray for equally decent leadership to help him succeed...leadership that will be seen by Iraqis as having genuine motives with prompt follow-through on important promises.

Let's face it..thanks to President Bush, we unnecessarily broke Iraq and now we've bought it. We are at their service now, if we look at this as ethical business (and we must). The overall personal customer service in Iraq stinks so far. An ethical businessman is always a gentleman (or lady).

I wish Bush was a gentleman. He's a chickenhawk, a shifty-eyed liar, an inexperienced and irresponsible Texas-tough talker (double-daring killers to attack our troops), a bumbling buffoon.

Because human beings are prone to illusion, the sounds and sights of battle—the groans of the wounded, the maimed bodies of one’s comrades—may remain in the mind for many years, like a cloud that confuses judgment. Hence, a man who has fought on the battlefield and has later risen to high office may be fearful of leading his people to war. Such weakness does not afflict the armchair warrior, who at all times is firm in his resolve.
--Evan Eisenberg



We need more Dana Pittards. If anyone can win this war, it will be the men and women who come forth with a force of genuine compassion and respect.

In the following story, an Iraqi Shi'ite cleric claims that a decent gesture by Col. Pittard did not change his views on the occupation. You simply cannot recognize a friend when you and your brothers and sisters are being assaulted.

I put myself in that Muslim cleric's place. My own current views on our occupation of Iraq aren't much different than his.

I believe, however, that Col. Pittard's described gesture and kindness is something that will not soon be forgotten by the cleric.

It's small gestures like these (along with larger gestures such as securing world cooperation) that will eventually, (with better leadership in Washington), change the hearts of freedom-seeking Iraqis.

The story:


[A senior Shiite Muslim cleric, Ali Abdul Kareem Madani] has his own reasons for disliking the U.S. occupation. He returned to Baqubah on May 25 after nearly 10 months in seven different Army detention centers, where he was taken after being accused of promoting anti-U.S. violence early in the occupation.

The charges against him have not been dropped, U.S. officials said. But Army Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, who recently took command here and realized Madani's position of influence, helicoptered to Umm Qasr -- about 325 miles to the southeast, at the head of the Persian Gulf -- to secure his release from prison and escort him home, according to Iraqi and U.S. sources.

Pittard has shown himself to be a gentleman, Madani said, but the gesture did not change his views on the U.S. occupation.
[LINK]




*For insight into the security mess in Ba'qubah, read Eric Jewett's ("Baghdad Eric's") entry about his frustrating experience there. Mr. Jewett has been working for the Coalition Provisional Authority as an advance representative and special assistant to Paul Bremer.

Tenet Should Not Be Bush Sacrificial Lamb

Tenet Should Not Be Bush Sacrificial Lamb

Knowing Porter Goss is the likely replacement for George Tenet and knowing Porter Goss is the Republican chair of the Intelligence Committee who is skewering George Tenet seems a definite conflict of interest.

It seems the Bush administration would love to make Tenet the fall guy for "misleading them about WMD".

If Bush's motive for war on Iraq was actually WMD, I'd understand.

From their standpoint, WMD was not the Bush administration's reason for the Iraq war.

WMD was just the way the President Bush (and his cabinet) conned the public..using George Tenet's bad advice knowing fully-well they shouldn't have. (per Bob Woodward's "slam-dunk" account).

Tenet was the most convenient of all people to leave his post.

One resignation does not come close to resolving the problem in Iraq or relieving Bush of his complicity in leading us to a totally unnecessary war in Iraq.

The smelliest skunks remain firmly in place and perhaps they will only be removed when we eject them from their undeserved positions in November.

If Bush doesn't have the guts to do it, we Americans will do it (provided Diebold hasn't already arranged the electoral swindle).

Thursday, June 03, 2004

Like Sunnis, Shiites Now Love the Extra (extra) Crispy

Like the Sunnis, Shiites Now Love the Extra (extra) Crispy

...and Americans are less safe than ever..

I had to quote this gem from Juan Cole. From 'Making Americans Safer':


The riots in Karachi on Tuesday, protesting a bombing at a Shiite mosque in Pakistan's major port, involved setting fire to American fast food outlets. This sort of attack had previously been common among radical Sunnis, but it is ominous that now the Shiite mobs are asking for very extra crispy KFC. Now I find that in my old stomping grounds of Lucknow, India, where the Shiite community had been so kind to me in the early 1980s, Americans are now unwelcome. Why, if the Bush administration has any more successes in the War on Terror, I just don't know how we'll be able to survive them.

[LINK]


*Actually, this won't be the first time Extra Crispy was ordered..just a batch of new customers.*

Also, be sure to see the cheery Sistani Fatwa on the New Government of Iraq!

Porter Goss raised as one possibility for Tenet job

Porter Goss raised as one possibility for Tenet job

Ex-CIA Goss poo-pooed the fury over Valerie Plame outing as "partisan politics"; Claimed CIA leak was not worthy of committee action

I heard a pundit on a cable news network name Porter Goss (R-Fla), an ex-CIA-man, as a fitting replacement for George Tenet. It's out in the press, too.

I certainly am not impressed with the look of his past voting record in Congress, from a purely ideological standpoint. Look at what he said indicating his feelings about the non-importance of the treasonous outing of Joseph Wilson's wife, agent Valerie Plame. Does that matter, you ask? Nonchalance about this outing of an agent coming from an ex-CIA, I should say so! Given the fact we need to regain out trust in someone to be totally independent from partisanship and totally independent in their CIA position, I'd have to say YES--it matters a lot.

Interestingly, Juan Cole believes Tenet's resignation may have much to do with the Valerie Plame case.

I'm sure he's not the best person to put into the job at this precarious and divisive time in our nation. I have a feeling we'll wind up getting him, anyhow.

FYI, here is a question posed to Goss just after 9-11 in an interview with PBS/Frontline:


FRONTLINE: Do we need a James Bond agency that goes out and basically whacks people?

Porter Goss: No, we don't. We don't need that. ... We have been trying to redefine our defense capabilities to respond to the kinds of threats we have today, and we're trying to do the same exact thing with intelligence, change the capabilities we have. Do we need more arrows in the quiver of small "c," covert action? The answer is yes. There is no doubt about that. Is it a James Bond assassination squad? Certainly not. It's a great movie, but movies, unfortunately, are not reality.

Back in the day when James Bond was popular, that was sort of the image of intelligence. Those were, in many ways, the heydays. ... Now we're in the position where we have had to overcome this sort of bad period where intelligence is not only unfashionable, it's un-American, and we don't want to do that any more. We've had to resist that, rebuild the financing for it, rebuild the recruiting, rebuild the morale. It has been a very hard problem, and we are caught a little short, and that's one of the reasons.

So when you say, *"Was this a cultural problem that we had?" The answer is partly yes, because we decided that the world didn't need quite as much intelligence, and we weren't sure what it exactly it should be. So we backed off from some stuff. I can't say we would have prevented the tragedies of last Tuesday if we'd had more intelligence. I'd just say the odds were higher that we could have.


[LINK]


From an informative Washington Post article about Goss:

Before President Bush's election, Goss's name surfaced as a candidate for the top CIA job amid speculation that Bush would replace Director George Tenet, a Clinton appointee.

Goss supported Tenet as a holdover and has not wavered in his support amid calls by others for Tenet's resignation after 9/11. After blasting Tenet last fall, Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), the Senate Intelligence Committee vice chairman, also described Goss as "close to a lot of people" at the CIA, telling Roll Call, "I don't think we should be too close to anybody we have oversight of, because you can't do your job."

But other prominent Republicans -- namely Bush and Vice President Cheney -- maintain great faith in Goss. Though Goss had said he would not run again, Cheney was dispatched earlier this year and helped persuade him not to retire. Goss also recalls seeing the president on two occasions and quotes him thusly:

" 'Porter, listen, I really want you to stay.' He said, 'This intelligence stuff is important. I want you here.' " And, Bush told him, "You've got it exactly right."

[LINK]

George Tenet Has Resigned

George Tenet Has Resigned

The CIA deputy director will serve as acting director until a replacement is found.

The singing birds in the Rose Garden were far more animated and interesting than Bush when he made shell-shocked comment on the resignation today.
[LINK TO BUSH REMARKS ON TENET- VIDEO]

[LINK]


Tenet's biggest mistake was behaving more as part of the Bush administration and less as a properly independent Director. That was not his job. He especially crossed the line on WMDs in Iraq, where he, Colin Powell, and the Pentagon all provided tainted information that was not nearly accurate and contributed to the (patently false) rationale to make pre-emptive attack.



I'll never understand why Tenet and Powell sat together at the UN and gave that faulty dog and pony show about WMDs in February, 2003.

I somehow trust, from sheer intuition, that Tenet and Powell were somehow ill-used and are truly, truly decent men at heart.

Tenet is going to spend quality time with his family. I wish him happiness.

It's odd timing....while Ashcroft stands at a podium and tells us terrorists are ready to strike domestically, Tenet walks away.

These are strange days, indeed.

Now Colin Powell (and the good Mr. Armitage) should turn in resignations and leave the worst of the liars behind to rot away.

Books should be written.

'60 Minutes' appearance schedule slots should be filled.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Robert G. Kaiser, Associate Editor at the Washington Post, thinks (perhaps) Tenet must have been livid to discover (if it's actually the case) that someone in or affiliated with the Pentagon had caused the disaster of Ahmad Chalabi telling the Iranians that their code had been broken. He says he can imagine him thinking this was the straw that broke the camel's back. [LINK]

Meanwhile, the used-up-spook Ahmad Chalabi is bad-mouthing George Tenet. I really don't think that's going to go over big with the American public now that Chalabi's been soundly trashed, sliced, and diced in the American media, deservedly or undeservedly. His credibility has been "flushed from the bathroom of our hearts", as the late singer Johnny Cash would have said.

See Miss-information for a look at reactions around the world about the Tenet resignation.

Bush seeks credibility for Iraq failure through WWII analogy

Bush seeks credibility for Iraq failure through WWII analogy


"........mustn't say Viet Nam.........say Hitler...
.....mustn't say Viet Nam...say Pearl Harbor..."


What can we do about a President whose brain-washing "vision-speeches" have no connection to facts on the ground?
*(We could start by not re-electing the buffoon)*


Sidney Blumenthal (who is NeoCon Michael Ledeen's favorite "liar") rips away the political brainwash-curtain to reveal the simple fact that Iraq is far closer to a VietNam than it will ever be to WWII.

But don't ask Sidney. Ask the fine folks at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennslyvania:



....on the eve of Bush's appearance at the Army War College, its strategic studies institute released a report, Vietnam and Iraq: Differences, Similarities and Insights, observing the similarities as failures of strategy, maintaining public support and nation building.

It also noted:

"Prospects for creating a stable, prosperous, and democratic Iraq are problematic, and observers and decision makers should not be misled by false analogies to American state-building success in Germany and Japan after World War II."

"They haven't known what they've been doing since the statue of Saddam came down," a military strategist at the Army War College told me. "Bush's speech was a vision speech with no connection to facts on the ground. That seems to be the limit of his understanding and ability. Even Vietnam doesn't look so bad in retrospect." But Bush will not make reference to "Vietnam and Iraq" in Europe.

[LINK-Guardian-Can You say VietNam? Bush won't.]

Pre-War Iraq: Journalists forgot what journalism is for

Pre-War Iraq: Journalists forgot what journalism is for


I found a particular quote from this Boston Phoenix article too important to be allowed to pass without special mention:



If Judith Miller, the New York Times, and the mainstream media in general had done a better job of covering the run-up to the war in Iraq — if they had given greater voice to the skeptics, if they had made it clear that the case for WMD was not a "slam-dunk," to borrow one of CIA director George Tenet’s favorite expressions — perhaps a few more moderates in Congress would have voted against authorizing President Bush to go war. Perhaps public-opinion polls would have been more mixed. Perhaps a few fence-straddling commentators would have gotten off the fence.

But the case for Iraq’s weapons capabilities and terrorist ties couldn’t have been absolutely disproven any more than it could have been proven. The media didn’t fail because they were unsuccessful in stopping the war. Rather, they failed because, in all too many instances, they parroted the White House’s rationale for war rather than subjecting it to rigorous, skeptical analysis. That is to say, they failed because they forgot what journalism is for.

[LINK]