Sunday, August 22, 2004

Trust Destiny: Letter to John Kerry

Trust Destiny:
A Letter to John Kerry




Dear John Kerry:

Manipulation of the media will not win the election. The muse that inspired you to speak out so eloquently against the Vietnam War might. In truth, if the Creator means for you to be elected, you will -- if not, you won't, and there is nothing you can do about it. More importantly, if you speak from your heart, what needs to be said will have been said, regardless of whether you win or not. The question is: do you trust this, or are you as cynical as your actions appear to be to anyone who has their eyes open? Trust destiny, not your handlers. Trust that the process of life will unfold things as they should be, and that your job is to speak your truth from as deep a place inside yourself as you are able. Then leave the rest to the Creator. The American people are hungry for the truth. They feel in their hearts that they are in a wasteland of lies, falsehood, and sham. They need inspiration, not rote speeches, infantile squabbles, and canned messages that have no heart and soul. Please, wake up! Damn the mines! Push the throttle forward, and let greatness form in your wake!

Sincerely,
Jim Bush
Portland, Oregon



Sadr Standoff-The Fight for a Shrine

Sadr Standoff

-A journey into the epicenter of the Sadr standoff
Scott Baldauf
Christian Science Monitor


-Continued Violence in Iraq
Juan Cole
Informed Comment

Fired in Frederick

Fired in Frederick
Advertising employee Glen Hiller of Berkeley Springs, WV made the mistake of thinking free speech at Bush-Cheney political rally was actually free.

"[Bush] surrounds himself with people who support him," Hiller said of Bush. ``Your opinion ... is viewed as right or wrong."

Obama has 41-point lead over Keyes

Obama has 41-point lead over Keyes


Say what?!

Distortion, blindness and the 'liberal' media

Distortion, blindness and the 'liberal' media
by Jimmy Dee, OnLineJournal.com

Right-wing pundits and politicians cry media bias almost any time a conservative figure or issue receives negative coverage. Through unending repetition, the notion of a liberal media has become such a staple of the American political dialog that it is only rarely questioned, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
[LINK]

New Kerry Ad Shows McCain Shaming Bush

New Kerry Ad Shows McCain Shaming Bush



Go HERE to see the powerful new ad.

Saturday, August 21, 2004

'Fahrenheit 9/11' Due on DVD Oct. 5

'Fahrenheit 9/11' Due
On DVD Oct. 5

Gary Susman, Entertainment Weekly

Just as he promised, Michael Moore will get ''Fahrenheit 9/11'' into video stores well in time for Election Day. Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment announced Monday that it will release ''Fahrenheit'' on DVD on Oct. 5, just 102 days after its theatrical release but nearly a month before the Nov. 2 election.

The disc, which will retail for a suggested $28.95, will contain such extras as deleted footage (including sequences involving homeland security and Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison), a featurette documenting the controversy leading up to "Fahrenheit's" release, footage of the movie's gold-star mom Lila Lipscomb at the film's Washington premiere, a featurette about Arab-American comedians in the aftermath of 9/11, and footage from the 9/11 commission hearings this past spring, including the testimony of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and a press conference held by President Bush after his closed-door testimony. Of course, with the film's video debut coming less than four months after its theatrical opening, it may still be playing in a few theaters. At this writing, according to Box Office Mojo, it's still on 716 screens and has earned $115 million to date in America.

Copyright 2004 Entertainment Weekly

MoveOn.org Vote for Change Artist/Tour Schedule

MoveOn.org
Vote for Change
Artist/Tour Schedule




Tour Schedule
Artist Quotes
Info

The Tank: Republican National Convention Blog

The Tank:
Republican National Convention Blog


Information on activities during the Republican National Convention at the Tank, 432 West 42nd St, and around New York City.

A summary of the latest blogposts from RNC bloggers.

Organizations in NYC

Counter GOP Concention events.

The UnConvention.

Imagine Festival

Drinking Liberally.

Beauty rises from dust

Beauty rises from dust

How can beauty arise from bitterly distressed circumstances, as in Afghanistan?
Perhaps only through art.


AP photo


This week, I was invited into another's world by seeing the film 'Osama'. By chance, I happened to find this N.Y. Times article by John Rockwell about the messages we receive of beauty delivered to us through the arts.
I'm also reading a cultural history book I recently picked up at the Plimoth Plantation about leisure and recreation during the Puritan colonial times in New England.

Finding this article..and then realizing that the article weaved both topics in such a way that leads me to believe that, from a personal standpoint, there are meaningful coincidences which lead us to change the world. Our eyes and ears are naturally attracted to the beautiful, and more than a distraction, beauty can be a healing and transforming force.


A repressive, judgmental streak in Western culture, from Plato to the Inquisition to the Puritans to hard-core Marxists to the political correctness of today, remains stubbornly suspicious of beauty. Moralists fear that beautiful church music can distract from the worship of God, that beautiful painting can hide cruel social realities, that beautiful films can sugarcoat contemporary cruelty.

I thought of the recent Afghan film "Osama" (and all the remarkable Iranian films to which it is so clearly indebted). A girl disguises herself as a boy named Osama to support her female family in the harsh years of the Taliban. (All the men have been killed fighting.) Eventually she is exposed, and her punishment, dispatch into sexual slavery to a lecherous imam with a harem, is harsh and cruel; there is no happy ending. The film shows a human and physical landscape stripped of nearly all human warmth or natural richness. And yet nearly every shot is colored and framed and imagined to be breathtakingly beautiful.

Is the beauty of "Osama" a delusion? Does it serve as a mere lure to get us to confront horrors we might otherwise avoid? Or is there no inherent contradiction between beauty and the full range of human experience?


Stooping to indignity with George

Stooping to indignity with George

Seen out in the blogosphere:

"To go to a Bush rally today, I'd have to tell lies that I support the man, and I'm not going to stoop to that indignity just to see a president. This used to be a free country. I miss it. I hope we can get back to that America after November."

Washington Post Slams Swift Boat Vets

Washington Post Slams Swift Boat Vets

Green and gangly trumps the Old Liars' Club.

"For Kerry, then a green and gangly Navy lieutenant........"

Here's a good question:

Will 'green and gangly' trump
'yellow-belly'
?

Friday, August 20, 2004

The Grampy Patrol

The Grampy Patrol

I had great fun reading about Juice's Walt Mart adventure at Tales from the Liberry.

Thanks to Juice, I was blissfully led to the Horribly True Tales of the Drunken Trucker .


"They warn me that I can't distribute this
resume in Tempe
".
Have you seen the Most Mentally Ill Job Resume?
A prehistoric blog. *wink*

Kerry and the Iraq Votes

Kerry and the Iraq Votes
Can Kerry Just Be Himself?
By J. Douglas Allen-Taylor Berkeley Daily Planet


This isn't going to be easy.
In a post-9/11 world, Mr. Allen-Taylor states that progressives (ie: Robert Scheer) should not look to the election of 2004 as a reprisal of 1968.

The U.S. military presence in Iraq that is exacerbating the problems we face in the Middle East. Most Americans now believe that we never should have invaded. They also believe that a precipitous U.S. withdrawal would make things worse. These are legitimate yet opposing views.

John Kerry became the Democratic Party nominee precisely because he fudged his positions on Iraqi withdrawal, straddling the great American divide (yes, we shouldn't have gone in, but how we should leave is a matter yet to be determined). Turning from that course in either direction would now tip the balance and lose Kerry one wing of the Democratic Party or the other, dumping all of us into the abyss.

The only way the nation will have a chance – within the next four years – of pulling itself out of this Middle East mess, is to let Kerry BE Kerry. If Bush wins, we go in deeper, without a doubt. If Mr. Kerry wins, we may not.

Mr. Allen-Taylor makes the observation that it's not the best of choices. But it's the best choice we're going to get.



If you love your country, why on earth wouldn't you hate a person who you firmly believed was destroying it?




Allen-Taylor's article sounds like what we've come to know as "Anyone But Bush".

Is that a negative thing? I don't think so.
Is it a "Bush-hate" thing? Sure, I think it is.
We all know what hating Bush means.
Why deny it?
Many people believe he's the worst president this country has ever had.
If you love your country, why on earth wouldn't you hate a person who you firmly believed was destroying it?

What do you think?

Iraqi soccer players angered by Bush campaign ads

Iraqi soccer players angered by Bush campaign ads
Sports Illustrated

Recently, Daniel Pearl's family asked Cheney and the entire Bush administration to immediately stop using Daniel's name for their political campaign.

Now, members of Iraq's olympic soccer team are angrily saying that they have been made unwilling participants in a new political campaign ad for Bush.

What Went Wrong in Iraq

What Went Wrong in Iraq
ForeignAffairs.org

Larry Diamond is Co-editor of the Journal of Democracy and Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. From January to April 2004, he served as a Senior Adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Baghdad.

In summary, Mr. Diamond has written an article about the consequences of early U.S. blunders in the occupation of Iraq. The Bush administration was never willing to commit the resources necessary to secure the country and did not make the most of the resources it had. U.S. officials did get a number of things right, but they never understood-or even listened to-the country they were seeking to rebuild. As a result, the democratic future of Iraq now hangs in the balance.

Web Logs: The New Class Bulletin Boards

In the Classroom, Web Logs are the New Bulletin Boards
From the N.Y. Times

Anti-Kerry Swift Boat Vet Denies Vietnam War Ever Took Place

Anti-Kerry Swift Boat Vet Denies Vietnam War Ever Took Place

It must be true! I read it at Tom Burka's blog!

An Attack on Democracy

An Attack on Democracy
By Dr. Robert Abele, professor of philosophy; author of "A User's Guide to the USA PATRIOT Act", published by University Press of America, due out in November

These are very serious charges and very serious issues, including unconstitutional acts by the Bush administration and at least four particularly horrific ways in which they have circumvented democracy (well-detailed).

Slice of life from the Kerry campaign trail

Slice of life from the Kerry campaign trail
August 20, 2004
Charlotte, N.C.


--Of the 15 odd folks that appeared there, one was a woman carrying a Kerry sign, and several firemen carrying Bush signs.

"Hey you were the guys who put the fire out at my house!", the woman said, as she recognized the firemen.

"When it comes to work, politics doesn't matter", one of the firemen said, exemplifying what is best about government work.--


[LINK-Anonymoses]

General Who Supported Bush in New Kerry Ad

General Who Supported Bush in New Kerry Ad

Feith: Military advice from a dubious character

Feith: Military advice from a dubious character


They have faith. The Bush administration destroys that faith more and more every day.


General Tommy Franks on Douglas Feith:


"I have to deal with the f*cking stupidest guy on the face of the earth almost every day."
From Bob Woodward's book "Plan of Attack"

________


Douglas Feith? You're not sure who he is, you say? I think you should get yourself acquainted with him before you even consider his take on the state of the military.
Start by reading this.

The hack that equipped the Bush administration with the PR-fodder they desired to make the unnecessary Iraq invasion politically palatable is now trying to sell you on the idea that removing a significant presence in South Korea is smart.

Douglas Feith has it ass-backwards when he says:

In this political season, it was inevitable that some critics would charge us with "unilateralism." But the charge gets the matter backward. The posture changes will make U.S. alliances capable and usable well into the future. The failure to make such changes could doom our defense partnerships to irrelevance.


1. In any season, we went headlong into a unilateral action (whether or not Tony Blair killed his political career by following).

2. Political season? In any season, politics is the only priority that has driven the Bush agenda.

3. The Bush administration has already crushed our international alliances with his macho-bully (who gives a sh*t about you?) policies. What does it matter that our allies are "capable" if they don't respect us enough to deal with us in the first place?

4. Bush has already doomed a good part of our defense partnerships, and Douglas Feith himself was part of the machinery that destroyed America's stature and credibility.

Why the hell would anyone believe Douglas Feith now?

He should have been ousted from his dubious position long ago.

Mahdi Army Departs Shrine

Mahdi Army Departs Shrine

It appears that the Mahdi army has departed the Imam Ali shrine in Najaf. I'm relieved there was no bloodbath there in that holy place. The Mahdi militia has not laid down its arms to date. Juan Cole states that what the US military has done to Najaf in the past two weeks while fighting the militiamen has already deeply hurt the reputation of America in southern Iraq and indeed in much of the Muslim world.

Kerry stands proudly by his wartime record

Kerry stands proudly by his wartime record



I'm so glad that Senator Kerry has stood up for his wartime service record proudly and boldly.

Open Secrets website here.

What these swift boat defamers are doing is putting a blue-dress-style stain on the proud and glorious sheen of of serving our country during wartime.

Be all that you can be----only to have your bravery and effort diminished and smeared by irresponsible lies while you watch the Armed Forces' commander in chief smirk.

Go get 'em, John.

Thursday, August 19, 2004

Zell Miller keynote speaker at GOP Convention

Zell Miller keynote speaker at GOP Convention

He's no Democrat!


The same Zell Miller who was chief of staff for the unrepentant racist Lester Maddox will be the keynote speaker at the GOP convention.

Yes, Zell Miller was right-hand man to Lester Maddox who, in 1964, smashed in the roof of a black minister's car. Maddox also publically pushed defiance of federal civil rights legislation calling for desegregation of restaurants and other public places--he pushed his racist agenda so strongly that he passed out axe handles to white customers at his eatery to prevent its integration. Later in the year, Zell Miller's boss Maddox closed the Pickrick establishment rather than be forced to serve African Americans.

Yes, my friends. Lester's ex-chief of staff Zell Miller says that today's democrats are too liberal--and maybe he thinks they should be like his old buddy. The same old buddy, Lester, who picked up a pistol and chased black protesters from the Pickrick fried chicken restaurant the day after the Civil Rights Act was signed into law.

Was that the kind of Democrat for whom Zell waxes nostalgic and for whom he has the true respect?

This lone little traitor, Zell Miller, will be staring down the rolling thunder of the unified Democratic party when he delivers the keynote speech.

How pathetic for the RNC.

The Democratic convention convinced an ex-president's (a Republican's) son to come and speak about an issue that will benefit mankind--steam cell research.

The Republicans get a man who was connected with an era of ugly violence against the black race and whose poor character would lead him to be a political traitor to his party because his fellow party members (including the North Carolianian who has been chosen to be the VP Dem candidate) did not choose to be part of his washed-up conservative Dixiecrat circle.

Hey, GOP--we saw Bush snub the NAACP this year. Your popularity poll numbers with African Americans have never been lower. You disenfranchised more black voters in 2000 than Lester Maddox bopped in the head with his axe handle in '64.

The smell of voter suppression coming out of Florida is getting stronger.

A great moment in liberalism was Lyndon Johnson signing the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

GOP, keep going backward--you can have Zell!

Nick Cohen has lost the left

Nick Cohen lost the left

If he took a rational view of modern political science, he might see where it went

Part One- He blames commies and a film.


Nick Cohen begins his diabtribe against the left titled "Where Have All the Children of the Left Gone?" by blaming a movie. Why such emphasis on a piece of entertainment? I think you have to ask yourself that question because it colors much of his complaint.

Cohen imagines the millions of people who viewed 'Fahrenheit 9/11' as those who would see Iraqis as "comrades". I really think that's pushing the envelope....no...ripping the envelope.

Most of the people who viewed the movie had no strong political or ideological motivation whatsoever. I would say the major force driving them to the theater was sheer curiosity.


Just wait for the book.

Curiosity will also lead people to read Michael Moore's upcoming book of letters from Iraq war soldiers.


After 9/11, we're told that we're leaving cold war thinking behind....but are we? When will our ideas catch up with our bombs?

Cohen writes as if Marxism was still a major threat to modern societies. The Cold War ended some time ago and I think we've all seen political progress and mutation borne by the mere passing of time.

The problem with the hard right is that they cling to old ideas, therefore thay cannot imagine how the left may have evolved. Perhaps that is why they are called conservative...and perhaps that is why many of them have to be careful about what they choose to conserve. Antiquated thought is seldom a healthy thing to be clinging onto. History can be used to make a better future rather than used as a tool for division. The world has changed drastically over time and the fact that 9/11 occurred and we were shocked and unprepared was proof-positive that many of us simply didn't "get it".

So, I ask you---when will we get it? We aren't going to win any wars against terror in a divided global state.


Our world troubles shouldn't be posed in the tired frames of right-world vs. left-world any longer.


Right/left? How utterly simplistic.

I believe Mr Cohen is far too simplistic in his analysis. If we examine the world through the eyes of a political scientist, we would see that it's full of myriad systems and movements that are vying with each other for power.

We need imagination (as the 9/11 Commission pointed out to America). We need to see fewer of our differences and more of our common decency.

Our world troubles shouldn't be posed in the tired frames of right-world vs. left-world any longer. If we use our intelligent imagination, we would see how American-style corporate capitalism and statist liberalism can work successfully together to beat terror. (The folly of Iraq exposed a gigantic crack between the two, however, and we need to mend those fences with intelligent leadership).

When are we going to learn?

This incessant mistrust and teeth-baring at the left is going to kill us--and I mean that literally.

We need to be decent and civil world vs. indecent and uncivil world.
It isn't complicated and it doesn't take a genius to understand.
To his credit, I think George W. Bush believes this in its black-and-white terms, but has never had a clue how to make it a political reality.
He's a beautiful fool who should never have been allowed to run powerfully amok. I believe he was ill-advised by those he trusted.
I do not believe he was ever a capable leader.

If Cohen can't see the left anymore, he may need to take that log out of his own eyeball and put down that old crutch of left/right division (which should have died along with the cold war).


The right has shifted backward surely as the left has progressed

If we must talk in terms of left and right (bored sigh), let's state what is real and what is true.

In reality, what was once the "left" (and is still "the left" to Cohen's rather antiquated way of thinking) is now being replaced by what we know as the radical right. Think of the NeoConservative movement and the totalitarian-leaning activities by the Ashcroft Justice department and you may begin to understand what I mean.

The Bush effect

The Bush administration has contributed to this political upheaval and unrest in our world. They've practically ruined Tony Blair by his association with them.
Until the Iraq war, I'd wager most of the world saw Blair as a rational, intelligent, and decent leader.
He got into bed with a fool--albeit a beautiful fool.
The road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.

Cohen says honorable traditions have been forgotten by 'the left'. I think Cohen needs to sift through the cobwebs in his mind and think anew. All good people desire honorable and decent goals. There are good people on the old left and on the right and in all ideological spaces in between.

If we don't seek the common angels of our better nature, the civil world will go to hell.

The Press: Commercial consideration triumphs truth

The Press: Commercial consideration triumphs truth

Press contributed to unnecessary war in Iraq through soft censorship. They buried stories. We got war.

Executive editor Len Downie appeared on the August 18th Online News Hour and tried to reassure moderator Terrence Smith that his Washington Post was not a megaphone for the Bush administration.

Smith's question was this: Was there, Len Downie, a reason why those stories that did question those assumptions [about reasons for war; WMD] ended up inside and that the administration views generally ended up on page one?

Mr. Downie replied: Well, administration views ended up on page one because it was the administration deciding whether or not we were going to go to war.

He called it "accountability reporting."
He blamed the Washington Post's administration-heavy war coverage on their editorial "focus".
I believe was it their determined (soft) censorship. They buried the stories. We got war. It really wasn't all that complicated.

I hope it won't happen again.
I don't have much faith these days, however.

Mr. Downie went on to say: What we did not place in the front page enough at the same time were the voices which were in many cases anonymous and not on the record and obviously not people in the same public offices at that time, retired generals rather than active generals who were warning that perhaps this was not a wise war. In retrospect, I wish I had put more of those stories in the front page.

If any lesson is to be learned, it's that our news editors must have a new focus. Now that they know (and we know) this Bush administration cannot be trusted, anonyomous sources may have to grace more front pages.

On the same Online News guest-panel, journalist and author Michael Massing made the comment that, in the period since 9/11, "the public mood has put barriers in the place of the type of skepticism and independence that we look for in the press."

I found this to be an accurate and honest statement.

The public mood should never have a bearing on the reporting of the truth, but I know why it does.

The responsibility of journalists should be asking the hardest questions and the responsibility of editors should be to proudly and boldly place the answers to those tough questions in the typical reader's direct sight, but I understand why that didn't happen in the lead-up to the Iraq war.

The truth is not always easy for a moody public to accept.
The truth doesn't sell papers if it's too controversial.
The truth may not help you gather advertisers in controversial times.

Obviously, commercial factors have a direct bearing on censorship.

Burying important stories was a harmful form of censorship.

This is a place where capitalism is terribly flawed.

The very fact that the press has to be questioned like this is dismaying because I know it took almost a thousand deaths of our American brothers and sisters in Iraq in order for the "public mood" to shift so the press could tell us the truth without fear of financial recrimination.
_______________________________

Danny Schechter asks: Why does the term “weapons of mass deception” still apply to our media coverage of a war that is at war with the truth?

Wednesday, August 18, 2004

Bush team refuses teacher admission to rally

Bush team refuses Social Studies
teacher admission to campaign rally


I'll bet she'll have a great lesson to teach her fall class.



Bush campaign staffers tore up a 55-year-old social studies teacher's ticket and refused her admission because she sported a small sticker on her blouse that touted the Democratic ticket of John Kerry and John Edwards.

"I had my ticket and photo identification, but they would not let me in because of this sticker," said Mead, a teacher at Traverse City West Senior High, who said she has seen Queen Elizabeth and Pope John Paul in person.

"I have never found this kind of screening anywhere in my travels around the world. I can't imagine being denied access to hearing the president of the United States speak."

[LINK]


Helen Thomas Tough on Kerry

Helen Thomas Tough on Kerry

Some very tough love for Kerry from Helen Thomas. I've said this several times now. If he wants to convince those hardest to convince--the ones who want to vote for him but demand clarity--John Kerry needs to put his clearest heartfelt thoughts on leadership (his thoughts in 2002, now, and the time in-between) in black and white and send it to the N.Y. Times.

Put your finger on the pulse, Senator Kerry.

Listen to Helen Thomas.
Listen to what's in the wind.
Listen to the hearts of troops that no longer beat.
Listen to the families of those troops like Army Capt. Humayun Saqib Khan of the Germany-based, 201st Forward Support Battalion, 1st Infantry Division. He wrote home in a letter: "This is a mess, why are we here? This is such chaos. We should be coming home instead of being here."

His family wants him to be remembered as a peacemaker..someone who cared about his fellow man.

Listen to the family of Marine Lance Cpl. Gregory E. MacDonald. Like you, Senator Kerry, he was a cerebral man, but he never made it home to tell his nation what you were able to tell our nation. He was a scholar who wanted to create peace in the Middle East. Greg told his friends many times that he would support any candidate who stood up forcefully against this war because it was wrong and was not sold on evidence, but lies and ideology.

Many of us have sons and daughters who are thinking of joining the service. They are loving and caring people. Even after Viet Nam, we have been a trusting people. Until this Iraq mess; this Iraq lie.

We need to trust now more than ever.

Put your finger on the pulse, Senator Kerry.

A Republican Clears His Conscience

A Republican Clears His Conscience

War in Iraq was a mistake

An unexpected four-page statement from retiring Rep. Doug Bereuter (R) of Nebraska must be driving Karl Rove to drink. Rep. Bereuter has stated it's his belief that it was a mistake for the Bush administration to have launched military action in Iraq, especially without a broad and engaged international coalition. He said his vote on the Iraq resolution was based on what he had been told about the WMD threat from Iraq. He stated: "Left unresolved for now is whether intelligence was intentionally misconstrued to justify military action."

I can recall, prior to the preemptive strike on Iraq, being told that "we can't wait for the smoking gun to come in the form of a mushroom cloud." The 16 words about Niger used calculatingly in the 2003 State of the Union speech stil ring out alarmingly in my mind.

Rep. Bereuter knows he's right and he won't let his conscience be erased by politics.

You may wonder why my headline is so large.
If this was Zell Miller saying something contrary about a Democratic leader, Drudge would slather it all over his front page. Instead......zippo.

Kerry's Invitation from Grover

Kerry's Invitation from Grover

Political intimidator-extraordinaire Grover Norquist has sent John Kerry a cordial invitation to attend one of his infamous weekly Wednesday meetings. I guess Kerry's attendance, in these conservative minds, would be akin to Bush attending an NAACP function (which Bush, of course, has refused to do).

Sincere congratulations go out to Grover and Samah on their engagement.


Krugman vs. O'Reilly

Krugman vs. O'Reilly

Thanks to Jim Gilliam, we have reels of the intelligent Paul Krugman facing off with the anti-intellectual "just-shut-up-you're-stupid" Bill O'Reilly at CNBC/Tim Russert.
(You'll need Quicktime in order to view them).

"This is not your show..you can't cut my mike."
--Paul Krugman to Bill O'Reilly

Here are a few of O'Reilly's fantastic Foxworld comments about his network:

"Colmes is a liberal( please!). Van Susteren is a liberal.(zzzzz) Shepard Smith is really nothing. (hmm-maybe he's right). We put more liberals on the air than conservatives (Bwah!). There are no talking points (see Outfoxed)."

Watch O'Reilly go nuts at the very mention of Media Matters. It's priceless. He compares Media Matters to the Ku Klux Klan.

Jim--a tip o'the hat to you. Thanks.
________

Popeye vs. Einstein

Here are my comments to Jim Gilliam's website:

Geez, turn down your speakers when O'Reilly bellows from the depths of his echoing "traditionalist" body cavern at the mention of "Media Matters". Ear plugs may be required.
I recommend ear plugs for most of O'Reilly's rantings. He fantasizes that if you don't agree with him you're a Commie elitist or a soft wimp or some other bullcrap generalization.
I watch him with the same expectations I'd have watching WWF. If someone chooses to enter his wrestling ring, they set themselves up for an anti-intellectual body-slamming, which only sates the bloodthirsty crowd.
I often wonder why any self-respecting liberal would grace his entertainment show and why Russert would even bother to give him the status he doesn't deserve by asking him to debate someone like Krugman. It's like watching Popeye debate Einstein. All Popeye's got is his can o'spinach. What fun is that?

Quote of The Day-Fareed Zakaria

Quote of The Day-Fareed Zakaria

"..it's widely understood in the business world that having a good objective means nothing if you implement it badly."

--Fareed Zakaria from Why Kerry Is Right on Iraq, Newsweek

George Bush-Take That Ad Off The Air

George Bush-Take That Ad Off The Air



MoveOnPAC is going to air a new TV ad in the swing states where the Swift Boat defamers are airing their own Kerry-bashing ad. MoveOn is exposing the fact that Bush (with his own weak wartime service record) has refused to condemn the misleading commercials...allowing false advertising that attacks John Kerry, a man who asked to go to Vietnam and who served with dignity and heroism.

MoveOn thinks Bush should pay the political price for his refusal to condemn the dreadful attacks.

It's going to be a pretty hefty price if the MoveOn ads are effective. Almost everyone I speak to in my own little town--- old/young, conservative/independent/liberal--- thinks the Swift Boat ads are rotten.
__________

C-SPAN provides a video of John Kerry's 1971 appearance on the Dick Cavett Show where Kerry debates the Vietnam War with John O'Neill. O'Neill is the author of the book attacking Kerry's integrity titled "Unfit for Command".

John Kerry: Cincinnati VFW Speech

John Kerry: Cincinnati VFW Speech

"I will wage war with the lessons I've learned in war..and those lessons run deep."


"Strength is more than tough words," said John Kerry today in his speech to the VFW Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Senator Kerry said that "we didn't have to become a divided nation" after 9/11, yet we did.

"I know what I have to do in Iraq", he said as he explained we need international allies' wide support in order to steer our troops safely home.

"I will wage war with the lessons I've learned in war..and those lessons run deep."

Kerry asked: "What is our long term strategy to make America safer?" (TRANSCRIPT).

About the troops, Kerry said, "Never send them into battle withouit a plan to win the peace. That is essential."

He recommended 40,000 new troops (not in Iraq) but to relieve the pressure of the overtrstretch of the U.S. armed forces today. He said the "backdoor draft" must end.

"We need to do everything we can to avoid another 9/11." Kerry said that "winning the war on terror demands a team effort", working cooperatively with other nations to secure good intelligence. About terrorists, he said that "we need to get them before they get us".

He called upon Congress to create a central national intelligence director.

Long term success demands the use of national power, international cooperation, intelligence, economic policy, diplomacy, homeland defense...and more.
"I will fight a smarter and a more effective war on terror," he said.

He stressed the use of principles as well as firepower.

He said question for November is not simply "Who will lead America?", but also, "Will America continue to lead the world?"

Kerry stated this is not the right time to redeploy 70,000 troops as Bush has recommended. He went as far as to say that the redeployment was hasty and could be dangerous, especially the redployment of 12,000 troops from South Korea.
___________

Before John Kerry got to the podium, the RNC had their uber negative attack machine in gear.

The RNC pulled out young Kerry's (circa 1971) criticism of the VFW and American Legion: "We will not quickly join those who march on Veterans Day waving small flags, calling to memory those thousands who died for the 'greater glory of the United States.' ... We will not readily join the American Legion and the Veterans of Foreign Wars." (as the Washington Times was happy to report).

Consider the reality of the Viet Nam conflict and its dreadful politics and it's not hard to understand how an incredibly intelligent young man who had fought in Viet Nam would have been disillusioned and confused about taking pride in what he'd had to do.

I respect young Kerry's confusion and disillusionment a hell of a lot more than George W. Bush never acknowledging that he wanted to avoid fighting in Vietnam altogether.

After having seen the speech, I don't think any vet in that Cincinnati audience today left with the impression that John Kerry didn't have the utmost respect for them and/or the deepest love for his country.

When he said "I will wage war with the lessons I've learned in war..and those lessons run deep," there was no question about what he meant.

They knew he was in-country back in the late 60s. A vet understand history better than you and me because he's faced the fire. I think they understand what John Kerry's talking about when he says he'll keep the faith with those who have served. It's a faith only a brother-in-arms might truly understand.

Norm Coleman Misleads on Jon Stewart's Show

Norm Coleman Misleads on Jon Stewart's Daily Show

I saw Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman totally mislead people last night on Jon Stewart's Daily Show. When Jon Stewart asked Coleman if it was true that a Rio Rancho, New Mexico audience for a recent Cheney-rally had to sign loyalty pledges in order to be admitted, Coleman said it wasn't true at all and it was a rumor started by "those 527s".

That was either a lie or a gross prejudice on Coleman's part.

It was in the news.

China warns Bush to follow international law

China warns Bush to follow international law

Beijing spokesman Kong Quan from China is warning Washington not to send the "wrong signal" to the East Turkestan terrorist force by releasing Guantanamo Bay detainees (from the autonomous Xinjiang region) to a random third country (vs. returning them to the Chinese government).

China's treatment of terrorists has been tough (as tough on terror as Bush has been), and I don't see where Bush would have the lawful (or the moral) authority to ignore China's request to get them back once they're released from Guantanamo. The Chinese have supported our war on terror thus far because they have seen that resistance to their own Chinese rule is led and fanned by Muslim extremists, usually egged on from outside China's borders.

Let's hope Bush doesn't decide to flip the bird to the rule of law and get China's feathers all ruffled. It's not the time to create tensions with foreign nations we need as allies fighting against terror. This is one of those sensitive issues where I have learned, from experience, to have shaken faith in Bush's possible reaction.

Albany Mosque Evidence Flawed?

Albany Mosque Evidence Flawed?

It's said there are possible flaws in a key piece of evidence in the recent case against two leaders of an Albany, New York, mosque accused of supporting terrorism. The error concerns a possible incorrect translation of one particular word. The word translators mistook for "commander" may have actually merely meant "brother". One of the accused men's attorneys has said it looks as if his client has been "framed". [LINK]

Don't stay the failing course in Iraq

Don't stay the failing course in Iraq

"Withdrawal [from Iraq] would be a blow to American credibility, but less so if it were deliberate and abrupt rather than a retreat under fire imposed by surging antiwar sentiments at home. (See Vietnam.)"

--Edward Luttwak, Time to Quit Iraq (Sort Of) , N.Y.Times op-ed

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

A Rock Star Speaks Up for Kerry

A Rock Star Speaks Up for Kerry

I should probably talk about the swing state shows because a number of you have commented on that. The truth is we were asked to headline a set of the shows ourselves and I turned it down. This was a really tough decision for me because I happen to think this is an important moment in American history. I just couldn't do it though. I can't take another day out on the road right now....

I will tell you how I feel however. I know a lot of you get all incensed at the thought of some musician spewing out his political opinions at you. I don't care anymore.

People who don't listen to what other intelligent people have to say are simply ignorant people.

I am going to be voting for Senator Kerry. I feel that he is a serious intelligent man who will deal with the problems we are facing in a thoughtful manner. These are complex problems. They demand complex solutions. I am not one of those people who believes President Bush is an evil man. I think that's silly. I just think he views the world in terms too simplistic to combat the actual problems we are facing. And I think he puts his trust in men who view politics as a means of retaining power rather than actually solving problems.

I don't think we need people who "act tough" and project themselves as "leadership types". Leadership is not about aping John Wayne. When did it become a presidential quality to be a "regular guy"? When did intellectualism become a dirty word? I want a president who's smarter than me.

It's not enough for him to seem like a great guy to have at a BBQ.

The media would have you believe these men are good or evil or cool or uncool. They want to paint these men as trying to pull the wool over your eyes. They want you to think the people who don't agree with you are hicks or elitists or soft or tough or a million other bullshit generalizations that miss the point that these are all Americans just like you and me. We are a vast nation of many different types of people.

The other guy may not agree with everything you believe but you will never understand him if you write him off the way the media does.

I am voting for John Kerry for president. I hope you will too. If you want to convince someone to change their mind, you have to first try to understand why they believe the things they do. Reduce them to a generalization and you will never accomplish anything. That said, Rush Limbaugh is still a f**king moron.

--Adam Duritz/Counting Crows

Convention Protesters Gear Up-NYC Prepares

Convention Protesters Gear Up-NYC Prepares

Read about the Republican Convention sideshow here at WP.

Did you know that a group of labor activists plan to stage the world's longest unemployment line, from Wall Street to 31st Street and Madison Square Garden, on Sept. 1? The line will form at 8:13 a.m. and dissolve at 8:31 a.m.

Looking forward-Looking back

Looking forward-Looking back

As the GOP Convention draws near, I wanted to bring a six-month posting of mine back to light. Time has a way of ripening a pundit's thoughts, proving him/her a sage or a fool. Retrospection gives us all a new perspective and creates a straighter path to the future. Please read this dead-of-winter blogpost and give me any thoughts you have on the subject. Don't be shy.

Oil up to 47 bucks a barrel

Oil up to 47 bucks a barrel

Yukos took a turn for the worse Tuesday and oil prices are up to a record $47 bucks a barrel. The fighting between U.S. troops and Shiite militants intensified in Iraq. Saudi Arabians have said said they could immediately pump an additional 1.3 million barrels per day, but that doesn't seem to be calming nervous investors. At least the Venezuelan situation has not added fire to the fuel...I mean..fuel to the fire.

Kerry:Troop withdrawal may undercut alliances

Kerry: Troop withdrawal may undercut alliances

John Kerry is expected to claim that the withdrawal of troops from Europe and Asia threatens to undercut alliances and weakens America's ability to project its power overseas.

Wesley Clark sees the withdrawl plan as a 'strategic mistake' while we're at a stand-off with a dangerous foe in North Korea and since European bases serve as “anchor points” for dealing with potential security threats in Africa, the Middle East and the Caucasus.

A message about bringing troops home is always a positive-sounding idea, but what will we use them for once they come back? Will they be shipped off to Iraq in 2006? Will they be on tap for more unnecessary unilateral strikes on nations that pose no imminent threat to us?


WSJ wants to talk about Cambodia '68

WSJ wants to talk about Cambodia '68

Robert Pollock wishes to discuss John Kerry's assertion that he was in Cambodia on Christmas Eve, 1968.

Pollock says:
Does this matter? Well, if President Bush was found to be using tall tales from his National Guard days to justify his policies in the war on terror it would certainly attract some attention. So the would-be commander in chief can hardly complain of being subject to scrutiny, especially since he's joined in criticism of Mr. Bush's war record and made his own a campaign centerpiece. Never mind the anti-Kerry swiftees. So far the veteran whose testimony is doing John Kerry the most damage is . . . John Kerry.
Is this the Wall Street Journal's obligatory ethical and moral equivocation for Bush's past?

If it is, then bring it on. (Note: No one will die as a result of my making this macho-sounding dare).

If we're going to talk about fabrications that were material to the blood and treasure of the United Staes of America, let's talk turkey.
GW Bush never faced enemy fire a day in his life.
Dick Cheney carefully avoided Viet Nam.
Both Bush and Cheney misled Americans about the war on terror, no matter how you try to slice and dice it.
We aren't stupid and we're not blind.

After over 900 deaths in a war of sheer option, we certainly will not forget.

Americans have had a battle with our short attention spans and the media sometimes has success with politically cashing in on our societal disability.

But not this time.

Not this time.

Silly photo



A sign invites those tortured souls in mullet-recovery, no questions asked, somewhere in the Mid-West
from: The Will to Blog

NY Times: FBI, stop intimidating free speech

NY Times:
FBI, stop intimidating free speech and go catch some real criminals


In today's N.Y. Times editorial, I was glad to see someone defending the First Amendment. Our top leadership in Washington, D.C. seems to wish to only suppress free speech. The Justice Department's use of FBI to intimidate American citizens is an abhorrent slap to the face of American freedom.

Ashcroft leads a McCarthyite witch-hunt against protesters---why am I surprised?

The FBI should go and catch some real criminals, Heaven knows there are some real bogeymen out there (especially if you heed the terror alerts that pop up every time Kerry's poll numbers go up).

I ask you: Have people like you and me--people who would express their views against many of their perverted policies-- become nothing but criminals to the Bush administration? Worthy of sucking resources away from the hunt for terrorists? Is the FBI abusing its power at the direction or with the approval of the Justice Department?

Wake up! What's going on, people?

Harkin: Chicken Cheney tough if it's others' blood

Harkin: Chicken Cheney tough if it's someone else's blood

OOOO! Iowa Senator Tom Harkin was very insensitive to have made the comment that Dick Cheney is a coward.

"When I hear this coming from Dick Cheney, who was a coward, who would not serve during the Vietnam War, it makes my blood boil. Those of us who served and those of us who went in the military don't like it when someone like a Dick Cheney comes out and he wants to be tough. Yeah, he'll be tough. He'll be tough with somebody else's blood, somebody else's kids. But not when it was his turn to go."

-Sen. Tom Harkin

What about McGreevey's Wife?

What about McGreevey's Wife?

As you watched N.J. Governor Jim McGreevey explain that he was a gay American last week, did you feel extremely uncomfortable for his wife? Boy, I surely did. Which leads to me this no-nonsense plea from Dan Savage in the Guardian today:



If it does nothing else, the McGreevey marriage highlights the chief absurdity of the arguments of those opposed to gay marriage: gay men can, in point of fact, get married - provided we marry women, duped or otherwise. The porousness of the sacred institution is remarkable: gay people are a threat to marriage, but gay people are encouraged to marry - indeed, we have married, under duress, for centuries, and the religious right would like us to continue to do so today - as long as our marriages are a sham. As long as we're willing to lie to ourselves, our wives, our communities, our children, and, for someone like McGreevey, our constituents. A closeted gay man like McGreevey can even marry twice and have both his marriages regarded as legitimate....If an openly gay man can get married as long as his marriage makes a mockery of what is the defining characteristic of modern marriage - romantic love - or if he marries simply because he despairs of finding a same-sex partner, what harm could possibly be done by opening marriage to the gay men who don't want to make a mockery of marriage or who can find a same-sex partner?...if the idea of a gay man married to a woman makes America uncomfortable, well, perhaps they should let us marry each other.

[LINK]



This brings me to the Log Cabin Republicans. When are these people going to wake up and smell the disgust the GOP has for them? I think they must be living in a fantasy world.

In an LA Times article, this is what one particular Log Cabin dreamer stated:
"We are giving President Bush an opportunity for a Sister Souljah moment," said Christopher Barron, political director of the Log Cabin Republicans. "This is an opportunity for the president to make clear that the GOP is a big tent. If there's room in the party for free-traders and protectionists, they've got to make room for us."
Sister Souljah with a simultaneous push for a constitutional amendment to "protect" marriage from those filthy gay beasts? What's wrong with that picture?

Here is the reality, from the same article:
Political observers say Bush is unlikely to accept the overture from gay Republicans for a unity plank...By advocating a constitutional amendment against same-sex marriage, they say Bush has calculated that he would rather risk the votes of the estimated 1 million gays and lesbians who voted for him in 2000 than anger evangelicals who feel passionately about the issue.
*A tip o'the hat to Angry Liberal

UPDATE: McGreevey's own words
NY Times: I Still Have Work to Do
By JAMES E. McGREEVEY
Published: August 22, 2004

What did Iraq Resolution really say?

What did the Iraq Resolution really say?

The Angry Liberal has some news for you...and some hard questions for president Bush.

About Angel and Jack's Boy

About Angel and Jack's Boy

Please read their story.

Quote: Walter Cronkite

Quote: Walter Cronkite

"I am dumbfounded that there hasn't been a crackdown with the libel and slander laws on some of these would-be writers and reporters on the Internet. I expect that to develop in the fairly near future."

--Walter Cronkite

Monday, August 16, 2004

Bush refuses to pray publically for Oregon

Bush refuses to pray publically for Oregon

Who's he trying to kid?

Exchange in an Oregon high-school gym, at a Bush campaign stump:

Female citizen: I've heard through the grapevine that Oregon is one of the most unchurched states in the union. And I really feel like it shows up in every walk of our society. Could you take a moment to pray for Oregon, for us, right now?

President Bush: I appreciate that. I think the thing about our country that you must understand is that one of the most valuable aspects of America is that people can choose church or not church, and they're equally American. That is a vital part of our society.

The question was probably no surprise. Bush campaign officials readily say that they carefully screen the crowds by distributing tickets through campaign volunteers. The result, according to campaign reporter Elisabeth Bumiller, is nearly always a "rapt Republican audience" and is often "a love-in with heavily Christian crowds".

The president declined to pray in the school gymnasium.

A bold move for Bush, who must think he's fooling voters (outside his campaign stump venues) by touting religious tolerance while hurling wedge-issues down their throats and supporting General Boykin's insanely fundamentalist comments about the Iraq war when he knows we're in a deadly power struggle with fundamentalist Muslims.

Thoughts from William Rivers Pitt

Thoughts from William Rivers Pitt

William Rivers Pitt believes the short-term purpose of the most recent terror alert is to "dissipate the building energy that is being directed at New York City by hundreds of thousands of protesters who intend to surround the Republican convention in a ring of rage."
*The FBI has been canvassing our communities and questioning political demonstrators across the country, and in rare cases even subpoenaing them, in an aggressive effort to forestall what officials say could be violent and disruptive protests at the Republican National Convention in New York.
Is this the free America you wish for..dream about??*

________

I recommend that you read the section titled "Killing the Buddha" at the same article by William Rivers Pitt. (Read the whole thing if you have time). Mr. Pitt says that progressives (whose political action groups have created a splinter-effect based on the respective Democratic candidates they'd supported this year) need to "leave aside the candidate they were following with such devout energy and hope. They need to remember that they, the people, are the point of the exercise, the power players, and not the candidates they followed."

As Mr. Pitt said in February of this year (as many progessives working for various Democratic candidates were becoming disillusioned as their candidates fell away):


The one you've been waiting for has always been here. The one you've been waiting for pressured these candidates to fight the onslaught of the Bush administration. The one you've been waiting for took to the streets before the Iraq invasion, worked for the campaign which most inspired, agitated against the PATRIOT Act, spoke to friend and neighbor and family about what has gone wrong.

This final truth is self-evident. You are the one you've been waiting for. You drive the agenda. You make or break this political season. You are the hero. You've been here the whole time.

[LINK]

Educate Yourself About Iraq Today

Educate Yourself About Iraq Today

..before it's too late.

How can two reporters see the same thing so differently? Who is a realist? Who is an idealist? You decide.

Juan Cole raises the stark contrasts in the reporting of the recent meeting of the Iraqi Congress by John Burns ofthe N.Y. Times and Rajiv Chandrasekaran of the Washington Post. While Chandrasekaran presents an almost panglossian story of the triumph of democracy, Burns says that the convention was a mess, disrupted by repeated mortar fire and by angry delegates who stormed the stage to denounce the Allawi government and demand it cease military operations in Najaf.

Who is Grand Ayatollah Muhammed Husain Fadlallah?

Shiite leader Grand Ayatollah Muhammad Husain Fadlallah (born in Najaf in 1935) granted al-Jazeerah an interview recently. The interview's subtext was basically: "Why isn't anyone doing anything about what those awful Americans are doing to the holy city of Najaf, which is an Arab as well as a Shiite issue?"
The issue came up of calls for the absent al-Sistani to resign, and Fadlallah (correctly) pointed out that high Shiite authorities don't resign, it isn't that kind of position. Fadlallah confirmed that he had called for the Iraqis to rise up and use all available means to force the Americans back out of Iraq. During the interview, he reaffirmed his opposition to Iraq's occupation and alliance with all who work for an end to it. He holds sway with a political party in Iraq, the Shiite al-Da`wa Party, who is currently averring to be cooperative with the U.S.

Who is Grand Ayatollah Kadhim al-Haeri?

Al-Jazeerah's crawl is saying that Grand Ayatollah Kadhim al-Haeri (the elder Sadr’s designated successor), based in Qom (Iran), has issued a fatwa or ruling that no Iraqi Muslim may fight another Muslim on behalf of the current regime in Iraq and its American backers. Al-Haeri is sometimes called the "fifth" grand ayatollah of Najaf.


President Bush has embroiled our nation in a Holy War

How many of my readers understand that President Bush has embroiled us in a Holy War, whether or not the war we've waged is religion-based? If one side clearly and successfully hypes the war as a Holy War, how do we, on the "other side", convince them that it is not a new crusade?


What does democracy mean to them?

What do we mean when we say we want to spread democracy? A stupid question, you say? Well, think about it. We see democracy as we have come to understand it here in America. The democracy we are promoting in Iraq is different from ours and the extremely powerful Fundamentalist leaders in the Muslim nations are calling us holy warriors who threaten their age-old customs.


Saddam was just a tin-pot dictator abusing Muslims

I'm not insinuating who's right and who's wrong here. I'm always on the side of freedom for all people. I'm simply pointing out that they have an incredibly different point of view about the pre-emptive attack on Iraq. Religion has an almost magical power over people and it's nearly impossible to separate the religious mind from the culture in the Muslim world. Attacking them certainly wasn't the way to convince them. Remember that the non-fundamentalist Saddam has been gone since last December and Iraq is still in chaos. The problem obviously is ages and ages old and Saddam was just a tin-pot dictator abusing Muslims to keep them under his thumb.


From where will our help come? Where are the brightest minds?

I'd like anyone who can successfully and convincingly argue with these Fundamentalists to step forward. No one in the Bush administration has been smart enough to convince them. Bombs won't convince them. Bombs will only kill them.

As sensitive as the Bush administration is trying to wage war in the holy city of Najaf right now, it seems that bombs are their only option.


What did the Bush administration get us into?

If they didn't have a convincing or desired idea to sway the people of Iraq, I believe the Bush administration has done Iraq, the U.S., and the Muslim world an incredible injustice. The Middle East has become an American-hating toilet of terror because we fell into Osama bin Laden's trap. Even if we catch him, he can still rejoice in seeing that his jihad is alive and well.

Frankly, I'm sickened at the thought.

Bush likely to lose election

Bush likely to lose election

Matthew Gross cites a Josh Marshall commentary about a recent David Broder column.

Bottom line, Broder believes the odds are against Bush being re-elected. Mr Broder states that, if you go by conventional ways of reading the numbers, both nationwide and in key swing states, President Bush is on the way to losing the presidential race. Sheer accountability for economic and foreign policy failures will be a prime factor for voters who decide to go against the Bush ticket.


Convention theme: "Let's dance the last dance..."?


Matthew Gross believes that pundits trying hard to find a bounce in early September (post-convention) for Bush, but he predicts it won't be there. He believes then, and only then, will the conventional wisdom intimated by Broder's column solidify.

I hope this is true. I do not have resounding faith in the mainstream media. If Kerry doesn't win by a landslide (by all that is sane, he should), I believe it's only because those in media have not done a proper job of reporting the truth. For example, I've seen one too many staged Bush rallies without news reporters pointing out the fact that they were limited to only those who were "friendly" to the Bush campaign. (CBS is the only news network I can credit for revealing the truth about these campaign stumps--and the word is spreading). I can't tell you how many times I've muttered "propaganda" under my breath when an audience-controlled Bush speech has been aired and the reporter never tells you the audience was practically hand-picked and that free speech was banned.

I credit organizations such as FAIR and Media Matters for exposing the dangerous cracks in the media. Disinformation leads to unnecessary wars and presidents (without a mandate) who push radical agendas down the throats of citizens.

Bush-supporters are well aware that the president is in danger of losing in November. They are blaming 527s and organizations such as America Coming Together for the incredibly successful voter-registration movement. Watch for the right-wing movement to end 527s (thus limiting free speech and the flow of new voters). I assure you that movement is coming. Strange bedfellows like Mitch McConnell and the ACLU would not approve.

Speaking of strange bedfellows, here's one last suggestion:
Do not 'misunderestimate' the power of Bruce Springsteen and Howard Stern.


Piedmont Bloggers Conference Aug 28th

Piedmont Bloggers Conference- August 28th

Blogger Ed Cone has written an article about political blogging at the Greensboro News & Record.

Ed Cone also makes us aware of the upcoming Piedmont Bloggers Conference August 28th in Greensboro. (For you bloggers in the South and anyone else who can make it). Moderators will include Matthew Gross, Ruby Sinreich, David Hoggard, and Ed Cone.

For a listing of NC blogs, see:
NC blogs
North State Blogs
Erskine Bowles for Senate

Sunday, August 15, 2004

Presidential Debate Schedule

Presidential Debate Schedule

It's here.

No times listed yet; only dates and locations.

First debate- Sept. 30 at the University of Miami, moderator Jim Lehrer, anchor of PBS' "NewsHour.

Second debate- Oct. 8, town hall-style meeting format at Washington University in St. Louis. Undecided voters, picked by the Gallup Organization, will question the candidates. Moderator: Charlie Gibson, co-anchor of ABC's "Good Morning America".

Third debate- Oct 13, Foreign policy will be the focus of the third and final debate at Arizona State University in Tempe. Bush and Kerry will again sit around a table, and CBS "Face the Nation" host Bob Schieffer will be the moderator.

VP Debate- Oct 5, at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, moderated by "NewsHour" correspondent Gwen Ifill. It will feature Vice President Dick Cheney and his Democratic opponent, Sen. John Edwards, sitting around a table and discussing a wide range of topics. There also will be a question-and-answer period.


Know Your Bushisms?

Know Your Bushisms?

Part Three is here. If you haven't tried Parts One and Two yet, there's a link at the site. Take the quiz. Tell me how you do!

Wacky Andy Martin Attempts to Defame Obama

Wacky Andy Martin attempts to defame Barack Obama

Freepers rejoice at the odd news

The 51-year-old wacko conservative with addresses in Florida nd Illinois named Andy Martin -aka Anthony Robert Martin-Trigona- (who ran an ad in 2000 accusing GW Bush of taking cocaine) is now actually trying to make people believe Barack Obama is a "threat to the Jewish community" because of his name's Muslim roots. That's a laugh, people. Now I've heard everything. Barack was actually named for one of the most beautiful words in the Arabic language, "Baraka". Baraka means "blessed", as Baruch means in Hebrew. Obama is an avowed Christian, regardless of the roots of his name.

If you met a man named Da'ud, Arabic for the Hebrew name David, would you run and hide? Gee, I hope not. That might be called extreme prejudice and irrational fear.

Isn't this whole thing incredibly stupid? Are you insulted that this would even make any form of news?

I saw the sick puppy-Freepers getting all excited about it at FreeRepublic.com.

I ask again: Why does this crap rate as news?

This is the same Andy Martin -aka Anthony Robert Martin-Trigona- that the Illinois Supreme Court refused to admit to the bar because of a military psychiatric exam that allegedly found him to have personality defects that include delusions involving both paranoia and grandeur.

Stranger yet, Martin's Obama-attacking press conference will be held at Temple Emanu-El in London, England!

Blogger becomes infamous media star

Blogger becomes infamous media star

The Washington Post magazine has Washingtonienne (Jessica Cutler) on its front page.

As a female political blogger, I am rendered speechless, which is out of character for me, as anyone who knows me will tell you.

Media always seems to go for the tawdry and sensational, especially when it comes to women.

Pandering to gossip-mentality may be the reason we have Bush in the Oval Office (ie: 'Gore says he invented the internet') and it may be why bloggers will not be properly credited for our (largely unpaid/unrewarded) hard work and dedication.

When media wises up, perhaps our democracy will spring back to an intelligent, sane and healthy life.

Until then, I'll be blogging and I definitely will not be holding my breath.

Mr. Kerry, please write the N.Y. Times

Mr. Kerry, please write the N.Y. Times

In today's editorial, the N.Y. Times believes the public may not be comfortably settled with John Kerry's explanation that he authorized an invasion of Iraq in October, 2002 under the presumption it would not happen. They say that, "after nearly two years of working with the Bush administration, Congress had a very good idea of how Mr. Bush viewed the world".

This is an echo of my own previous writings.

George Will wrote about it in the summer of 2002. Mr. Will said, at that time:
"What is under way is without precedent in U.S. history. It is a methodical and semi-public preparation for a massive military operation to achieve an aim frequently proclaimed at the highest levels of government. The aim is to compel a change of regime in a nation that is intensely and increasingly menacing as it strains to achieve the capacity for attacking American interests."

It was common knowlege that Mr. Bush planned to take us toward this pre-emptive war, and it was obvious he was doing it firmly and without sincere regard to further U.N. inspections.

Last week I recommended that Mr. Kerry write a piece for the N.Y. Times to clarify his position. Today, the Times advises that they would like to hear from Mr. Kerry as to how the events of the last year have changed his own thinking.

It's time, Mr. Kerry.
There could be no better time.
Write the New York Times.

The election is yours to win or lose.

Did Second String al Qaeda Outsmart Us?

Did Second String al Qaeda Outsmart Us?
It seems that the digital intelligence the terrorists possess is constantly traveling out ahead of our nation's own abilities. The knowledge helps to facilitate their overflowing funding from clandestine sources.
Will this be the aftermath of our nation falling so far behind in the educational fields of math, engineering and science?

This is new information from TIME. A newly revealed terror-summit occurred under our investigative noses in Pakistan in March, 2004. Radicals from around the globe attended. TIME writes that the summit occurred in a "lawless" region of Pakistan.

Four years after 9/11, why is any part of Pakistan still "lawless"? Is the war in Iraq making our nation economically and militarily incapable of outsmarting al Qaeda and their worldwide allies?

Florida's own Wahhabist el-Shukrijumah (who's been compared to Elvis due to his elusive nature) is our newest known 'homegrown terrorist'.

The Bush Administration is boasting that they arrested 12 of these people. Do we think that is the mark of booming success? Really?

I'm not sure I'd be boasting, knowing that a summit took place right under our noses a mere four months ago and most of the ringleaders are still at large.

We've seen the horror of which the first string was capable.

Where goes a second string, so goes a third.

Officials have said that the radicals' computer files were heavily encrypted, indicating significant sophistication within their network. It seems that the digital intelligence the terrorists possess is constantly traveling out ahead of our nation's own abilities. The knowledge helps to facilitate their overflowing funding from clandestine sources.
Will this be the aftermath of our nation falling so far behind in the educational fields of math, engineering and science?

Have we ever entertained the thought that pointing our children in the direction of an engineering degree (while strengthening our priority on improvement of the funding and quality of education) might be patriotic when considering the potential of the much-needed improvement of America's intelligence capabilities? When will we put our government money where our mouths are and put as much money into education as we put into the military?

We need intelligence to fight al Qaeda. Force alone will never, never do the trick.

We need the Bush administration (and Kerry's, if applicable in November) to get on the stick in the field of Education, Foreign Policy, and especially Homeland Security.

There are gaping opportunity areas. They are bleeding like open wounds.

Those 9/11 Commission recommendations are looming larger than ever.

Friday, August 13, 2004

Dear George-Do you hate me for my freedom?

Dear George-Do you hate me for my freedom?

Dear Mr. Bush, you are very easy to "see through". You told Larry King you wanted to do away with '527s' because people have said "bad things" about you with money coming from them.

Are the "bad things" they've said about you untrue, Mr. Bush? If so, why haven't your high-powered attorneys filed suit against those nasty people? (They did you "justice" when you needed them in the 2000 election, didn't they?) Could it be you could never prove that they were hurling untruths at all?



Why is money fine as "free speech" when it comes from your ultra-rich "base", (as I heard you affably call the 'have-mores' in Michael Moore's movie) and not when little 'have-nots' like me have something to say and choose to give to the folks I believe will speak well for me?

You refused to condemn the "bad things" the Swift Boat defamers are claiming about your opponent John Kerry. If you're such a decent and affable fellow with respect for our veterans, how is it that you can't reach down inside your soul and condemn the nasty things they're saying about Mr. Kerry? I'm thinking you are harboring a sadistic liking of the situation. Am I wrong?

Doing away with free speech isn't the answer, George.
No matter how rough the free speech gets.
Freedom, like a Purple Heart veteran, should always be given the benefit of doubt. When you're being asked to condemn the ads, as John McCain readily did, you're flinching, George.
It doesn't say much about your character; especially since your wartime service record is rather pathetic in comparison. (Sorry, bud, I know it hurts, but it's my opinion and I believe it's true.)

I know you, though, George. You're success is all "theatre". I know you like to carefully control the crowd at your campaign stumps. I am allowed to see the staged 300 people or so who gaze at you dreamily, gush over you, and ask you soft questions while thousands are outside the arena door loudly protesting you and your policies. I see the laughing Scarboroughs sitting in the crowd behind you with brainwashed love in their eyes.



I can separate fact from fiction, even though the cable news networks love the drama and often overlook reality--playing along with the fantasy that you have strong support. John Kerry doesn't ban free speech from his campaign stumps. I'm thinking he respects freedom a whole lot more than you do, George. I think freedom scares and threatens you.

Truth to tell, I think you're the quintessential emperor without any clothes.

There's a difference between you and me, George. You would do anything to shut your detractors up and out. On the other hand, I would do anything to protect the right of free speech for those Swift Boat defamers.

If the men in the anti-Kerry Swift Boat ads are liars, we have a justice system to hold them to their statements. If they are malicious or reckless with their statements, they should be dragged to court for all the nation to scrutinize while they watch Court TV. This is a healthy thing for an informed citizenry. Extracting truth is healthy.

I know you, George. You don't think much of the rule of law. I don't think you care that much about the truth, either, judging from all you told us during the lead-up phase to the Iraq war.

I'm surprised though, George---really surprised--- to hear you say you don't support free speech. You're always telling us terrorists "hate us for our freedoms". Why am I getting the distinct impression you hate many of us for our freedoms, George?

We shall miss Julia Child

We've lost Julia




We shall miss Julia Child



O Julia, Julia, Cook and nifty wench,
Whose unsurpassed quenelles and hot soufflés,
Whose English, Norse and German, and whose French,

Are all beyond my piteous powers to praise-
Whose sweetly-rounded bottom and whose legs,
Whose gracious face, whose nature temperate,
Are only equaled by her scrambled eggs:

Accept from me, your ever-loving mate,
This acclamation shaped in fourteen lines
Whose inner truth belies its outer sight;
For never were there foods, nor were there wines,

Whose flavor equals yours for sheer delight.
O luscious dish! O gustatory pleasure!
You satisfy my taste-buds beyond measure.

- Paul Child, Birthday 1961




Drudge has debate scoop

Drudge has debate scoop

Matt Drudge has posted early presidential debate schedule information. Official announcements will be announced this afternoon.

First Presidential Debate: Jim Lehrer (PBS)

Second Presidential Debate: Charlie Gibson (ABC)

Third Presidential Debate: Bob Schieffer (CBS)

Vice Presidential Debate: Gwen Ifill (PBS)

Rudy Guiliani doesn't need Michael Moore

Rudy Guiliani doesn't need Michael Moore

It's a foregone conclusion that Michael Moore doesn't need to tell Rudy Guiliani about 9/11, even though I saw that headline all over the front pages at news stands while I was on vacation last week.

When it comes to criticizing Bush for those seven minutes in that classroom when Bush was informed that America was under attack, Rudy says he thinks John Kerry is "armchair quarterbacking" based on cues from Michael Moore.

I didn't need Mr. Moore to give me any cues, and neither does John Kerry. We knew about the seven minutes long before "Fahrenheit 9/11" was in the can-- or anywhere near the can.

Matter of fact, Mr. Moore may have gotten his cues from the same place I did.
From real life.

The reality that proved to me that Rudy Guiliani was a brave, intelligent, and decisive man on the morning of 9/11 is the same reality that informed me, on that same morning, that my president looked more frightened and frozen as any typical terrified American.
Reality informed me that Bush was conspicuous by his long absence that morning. Peter Jennings informed me that Bush took off for some cave in East Fumbuck that morning, while people jumped to their deaths or burned alive..while my own brother ran from the Financial district (with thousands of others) in the chaotic streets of NYC.
While we watched..horrified..
while we waited.



Leaders were born that morning.

I think Rudy was the prime example.

Bush dropped out of the 'contestants for glory' early on..within the first seven minutes.

If Chic Hecht had been choking in front of Bush, I imagine he may have heard the child-soothing strains of "My Pet Goat" as he slipped smothering into his final sleep.

Sudan Genocide-Frist Makes Public Plea

Sudan Genocide-Frist Makes Public Plea

Bill Frist has made a plea in the Washington Post for international involvement and action to stop genocide and assist the suffering and the needlessly dying in the Darfur region of Sudan.

I saw a moving piece on the plight of the citizens of Darfur last night on PBS' Jim Lehrer News Hour. You can watch the segment by going here.

We watch. We weep. We talk about it. Hopefully, we don't have to scream about it before action is taken. Here's a worthy cause to immediately act for the good of mankind. There is no reason or sense involved when an 18-month-old is buried due to disease or starvation. Not in this world.

A fellow Syracuse resident-blogger, NYCO, did an excellent job of breaking down the history of another African genocide--the one in Rwanda. Titled "100 Days in Rwanda", NYCO dedicated her effort and time to helping us understand the effects of genocide and the startling reality when no one cares enough to act to stop it while it's happening in front of our eyes. We truly embolden terror when we let these crimes go unchecked.

The ghosts of Rwanda should haunt us all and wake us up to the reality of what's happening in the Western region of Sudan today.

Cut terror down in its tracks wherever it rears its head.

Here's an opportunity for the world to come squarely together on the struggle against terror.


McGreevey can only be one of the "G"s in America

McGreevey can only be one of the "G"s in America

"At a point in every person's life, one has to look deeply into the mirror of one's soul and decide one's unique truth in the world, not as we may want to see it or hope to see it, but as it is."

So true.
I'm sorry Jim McGreevey can't be 'gay' and 'governor' at the same time.

I mean.....I know it's physically possible to be both at one time.

So ask yourself why he's going to be only the 'gay' part as of November.

Hmmm....the pursuit of happiness?...freedom?....opportunity?

No, no.

Not for gays in America.

The land where our "role models" in politics refer to their opponents as "girlie-men" and mock others' reference to the word "sensitive". A land where a man or woman can offer their life for their country, but they can't talk about who they are and they can't hope to marry the person to whom they've committed their love.

It's all related.

It's got to be all or nothing here. Until we stop lying to ourselves, we are not the land of great freedom and opportunity. We are the land of silent persecution, mockery, and exclusion.