Friday, June 16, 2006

Thank You, Reps Murtha, Skelton, Pelosi


"The American people are not naive. They know a failed policy when they see one. Iraq is a failed policy. It's time to redeploy."

- Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa) (link to story below)

Thank You, Reps Murtha, Skelton, Pelosi

We can see how you are bringing sanity and appeals for truth and reconciliation to the debate on the House floor over Iraq. When I saw little Patrick McHenry from North Carolina, who'd never seen a battlefield in his life, shaking his fists and spewing every sanctimonious Rove-flavored talking point he could remember while supporting this vacuous resolution on Iraq, I could clearly see how empty their arguments have become. I regret that they hold majority status in the House. They've abdicated a serious responsibility by drawing party lines around a meaningless "stay-the-course" slogan that is at the core of this resolution.

You are right, House Democrats. Stay strong. The Republicans in our House are acting as partisans in unison with a Pentagon-propanganda sheet by their sides. They are dividing the people of this country with their tactics. This time, however, because of your strong voices, the dividing line created by the meaningless rhetoric of this GOP resolution leaves many, many more Americans on the side of truth and reality, regardless of the outcome of this resolution.

I respect all of you House Democrats for standing up.

God bless you all.
May truth continue to prevail in the hearts of the American people after this divisive resolution vote has long passed.

_____________

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH by John Murtha

See the USA Today rebuttal that twists the truth to the extent that, if their opinion held water with reasonable peoople, it would mean that Democrats who ask for a real debate and responsiblity for oversight on the failed policy of the Bush administration in Iraq would not be honoring our troops. The opposite is true, most Americans know that, and we can only hope and pray that these misguided writers of the Fourth Estate learn that - soon. It's obvious that people with common sense and a patriotic spirit still have much to fear from misleading journalists - the same ones who followed along with the majority (with no objectivity) and contributed to the misleading wave that resulted in our nation going to a totally unnecessary war.

When will they learn?

Thank God for the Fifth Estate - the bloggers and writers of the alternative press.


Thursday, June 15, 2006

The 2500th: Just a Number, Tony?



The 2500th: Just a Number, Tony?
Q: Tony, American deaths in Iraq have reached 2,500. Is there any response or reaction from the President on that?

MR. SNOW: It's a number, and every time there's one of these 500 benchmarks people want something.
Just a number, Tony?

Hardly.

He (or she) was someone's baby; someone's husband (or wife); someone's friend; someone's love; someone's life.

Never just a number.

MyDD Posts Netroots Survey Results



MyDD Posts Netroots Survey Results

Chris Bowers has graciously posted results of a Netroots survey at MyDD (cross-posted at Daily Kos) that you may have not yet seen. It was the first conducted under BlogPac's new management.

If Netroots-Democrats could give Democratic candidates any advice, the thing they'd most want to tell them would be: "Stand for something!"

Senator John Edwards received the highest "favorable" rating of any potential Presidential candidate for 2008, sharing the highest "very favorable" ratings with Russ Feingold, who is greatly admired by the Netroots. (A tip of the hat to Benny).

Bush Republicans Obsessed With Sex



Bush Republicans Obsessed With Sex

This is unacceptable, immoral, indecent...so say those in government who are obsessed with making war on something that will harm few people, but will get them a few extra votes in November from voters with warped priorities. (Dick Cheney can say a major "F**k you" to his colleagues in the Senate whenever he likes, but a schmuck on the radio will be fined for it).



Meanwhile we lead our children to believe that the circumstances shown in photo below are perfectly acceptable - even honorable, as George W. Bush and his Republican rubber stampers were (and still are) obsessed with going to an unnecessary war with another country.



Everyone sees the hypocrisy. Everyone can see that the object of the Bush administration's obsessions are a product of misplaced values-priority.

Saving life, at all costs, is a moral venture. Going to unnecessary war increases the chance that you will lay innocent life to waste.

I'd rather look at a bare breast - maybe a thousand bare breasts - than to know a child died needlessly.

Maybe you'll say that's a false choice - and heaven knows the Bush Republicans never give us any of those!

Storm Troopers' Delight



Storm Troopers' Delight

Don't bother to knock.
Just break it down.
That's what liberty sounds like.
That's what liberty feels like.
Thanks, Right Wing Supreme court.

And the New Boogey-Man Is.....



And the New Boogey-Man Is.....

Ask Ricardo. He makes a very good point.

Muhahahaha!




Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Rumsfeld Orders Gitmo To Go Dark for Journalism



Rumsfeld Orders Gitmo To Go Dark for Journalism

We cannot know what will happen in the last days of Gitmo. These are tales that have nothing to do with the beacon held high in the hand of the Statue in New York Harbor.

Nice Move





Nice Move

Someone, please tell me Bush didn't do this.

House Leadership Fears Open, Honest, Fair Debate on Iraq



"...what is being proposed is nothing more or less than, really, a charade."

- Walter Jones (D-NC 3rd district)


House Leadership Fears Open, Honest, Fair Debate on Iraq

The House leadership (partisan Republicans) are scrambling to cut off meaningful debate about Iraq in order to cover for the failed policy there. Raw Story is reporting that "a group of Democratic and Republican House members held a press conference today at the Capitol with their hands 'literally tied' to protest the blocking by Republican leadership of any real debate about the war in Iraq."
"Do not put us through the farce and the fraud of a pseudo-debate going nowhere and ending nowhere. This is not about a discussion of cutting and running. This is a question of whether the Congress is going to sit and watch while people are dying."

- Rep. Neil Ambercrombie (D-HI)
The House leadership continue to misjudge the hearts and minds of the American people. They've taken them for chumps - suckers - for just a little too long. You see fatheads like Karl Rove belligerently spouting, like a rebellious pimply-faced adolescent, that his party owes no one an apology for their tremendous amount of misjudgements and errors and lies told about Iraq, labeling a pointless occupation as "the central front in the war on terror."

"It is a cynical attempt to mold politics into a document that their political spinmeisters come up with to turn Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on terror, all munched in together, assuming that the American people are too stupid to know the difference."

- Rep. Martin Meehan (D-MA )
I don't personally want my government representatives to sit on their partisan asses and make cute and meaningless little "thank-you" resolutions and propaganda statements to cable news pundits while people die needlessly and soldiers fight for freedoms being blatantly denied to the People of the United States to have a realistic discussion about a war in which those soldiers are engaged.

Let's Talk Turkey.
Who Wants a Quagmire?


"Let those who believe that we should be in Iraq for the next 15 years or 20 years go on the floor and talk about it. Let the members of the House meet their constitutional responsibility and debate it and vote up or down."

- Rep. Walter Jones (D-NC 3rd district)

Quote of the Day



Quote of the Day

"....it is a good day for American jurisprudence as it has been upheld that it is not criminal to be an irresponsible, grudge-holding, power-grabbing, unethical, immoral jerk."

Xpatriated Texan on the news about Karl Rove's slithering escape out of an indictment.


Bush Looks Weak When He Defers to Gen. Casey



Bush Looks Weak When He Defers to Gen. Casey

- Iraq had no connection to 9/11. If Republicans are going to keep bringing up 9/11 as if it's connected to Iraq, they should be asked where Osama bin Laden is each time they raise the spectre. After all, wasn't he was the mastermind behind 9/11? Weren't we going to drain the swamp? The swamp has not been drained and we ran headlong to a another swamp altogether - and nearly drowned instead of drained.

- Bush is abdicating responsibility as commander in chief every time he says he's leaving it all up to General Casey to be the one who has the last say on troop levels in Iraq. Shit - who's the President, anyhow? For all his passion about defending the chaotic and unecessary path he took us down in Iraq, this abdication of the highest responsibility always makes Bush look weak and indecisive.

- Terrorist threats around the world will not fade away on their own - but the war in Iraq has created more terrorists than there ever would have been had we not precipitated an unjust and unnecessary unilateral war against a nation that had nothing whatsoever to do with the terror threat that faced the world in the first place. (That lies were told to the American public only serves to make things worse for those who participated in the knowing transmission of the lies).

- The President looked high and happy at the press conference today on the heels of killing the Bin Laden substitute boogey-man al Zarqawi. Will it be enough to remember this day when the television screens report on and on about the senseless killing that goes on in that country every day? I know of a soldier who came back after his first tour of duty in Iraq and told a classroom filled with ninth-graders that each Iraqi citizen that came up to him would say the same thing: "Thank you for getting rid of Saddam. Now you can go home." There's no sin in helping these Iraqis to find a political solution to the problems of their new democracy, and there would be myriad intelligent ways to internationalize the effort. But this occupation should have ended years ago. A foreign power killing Iraqi citizens embroiled in sectarian strife is not a good accompaniment to winning political hearts or minds and anyone with a fifth grade education should be able to see that. It never should have even taken place.

Louise Slaughter's Blogpost About Iraq



Louise Slaughter's Blogpost About Iraq

NY state Representative Louise Slaughter has written a blogpost to the Daily Kos site and even offered to answer some reader questions. She made reference to her report America for Sale: the Costs of Republican Corruption in which she'd written:



One of the ways House Republicans have made it clear they are not interested in getting to the bottom of the Bush Administration’s mismanagement of the Iraq War is by repeatedly blocking the Democratic proposal for an Iraq “Truman Commission.” During World War II, then-Democratic Senator Harry Truman conducted a series of famous oversight investigations into the Roosevelt War Department’s conduct of the war. The beneficial effects of these investigations (conducted by a Democratic Congress into a Democratic administration) were to reduce inefficiency and fraud in the defense contracting process and to strengthen our war effort. Not surprisingly, House Republicans have shown more interest in protecting the Administration from scrutiny than in ensuring that taxpayers’ funds are not being wasted and that our soldiers have the equipment they need. Republicans opposed a Democratic motion to consider the proposal in May 2005, and then blocked Representatives John Tierney (D-MA) and James Leach (R-IA) from debating the issue on the House floor during consideration of the Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 (H.R. 1815).



She referred to this week's "sham Iraq debate." More on the sham debate here.

Take Back America Breaks Agreement with Conscientious Citizens



Take Back America Breaks Agreement with Conscientious Citizens

"We were amazed to discover that the organizers of Take Back America treat dissent the same way that the organizers at a Bush rally do," said Ms. Murphy. "Most progressives do not support Hillary Clinton, and stifling our legitimate, heartfelt opposition to her pro-war position is an outrage. I guess we have to take back ‘Take Back America.’"


I think it's very important for you to know about suppression of dissent and a breaking of trust within the Democratic party. Officials of the "Take Back America" conference violated a trusted agreement made prior to the event regarding the logistics of protest from the moment citizens arrived at the event, which is held annually in Washington, D.C. Bear in mind the fact that this conference is supposed to be a venue for prominent progressives to gather and debate the major issues of our day. Read Medea Benjamin's story.

This, people, is not good news for America. It's telling us that, even at the doorstep of the party that boosts itself as a party that invites free speech and debate, there are limits when it suits a political purpose. Agreements they make in good faith will be crushed whenever they deem it necessary to do so.

Is that the kind of party with whom we wish to identify?

We'd best see some public statement of explanation or apology here.

If you see the injustice done to progressive citizens at this conference, please sign the pledge at Voters for Peace. (endorsed by Casey Sheehan's momCindy)

This time vote
for what you believe in.




Hear this NPR story about the Take America Back conference, along with interviews of some of the attendees by Mara Laisson.

To see Hillary Clinton’s position on the Iraq war, go to www.ListenHillary.org.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

It's About Time, Bush: Now Change the Course, Bring Troops Home




The soldiers in Iraq have done their duty.
Bring them back to the green, green grass of home.



It's About Time, Bush: Now Change the Course, Bring Troops Home


President Bush needed to make his secret trip to Iraq to raise his poll numbers. It was a great photo op, but it will be meaningless unless a change is made now.

Newt Gingrich, with politics on his mind and before he knew of the secret plans for Bush to visit Iraq, sniped at Bush who he'd thought was at Camp David:
"Are they really changing anything that we're doing in Iraq? Or is this designed basically to shore up and win public support."
If Bush uses this opportunity as a turning point - convincing the new Iraqi government that the U.S. needs to change its course in Iraq and turn this into a successful political effort with an earnest attempt to fully internationalize it, and to begin redeployment of U.S. troops now, he will begin to heal what are now almost non-salvageable wounds - the deep and bleeding gashes - felt by the American public for all the lies and misleadings about why the Bush administration made pre-emptive war upon the government of Iraq and many of its people while there was no WMD, no imminent threat to the United States, and no connection found by any reputable journalist to the planning and carrying out of the 9/11 attacks. It will also force the Iraqis to get on the stick and become responsible for themselves. Bush has been covering for their responsibility for too long.

We'd won WWII in the time it's taken for our President to TELL the Iraqis that they must take responsibility for their own security. What kind of leadership is that?

Karl Rove, who has apparently snaked his way out of charges in the Patrick Fitzgerald investigation, says that Republicans owe no apology to the American public for all the lies and misleadings on the Iraq war. Karl's a day late and a dollar short. The apology was already made by Condoleeza Rice months ago when she admitted the thousands of mistakes that were made in Iraq. Public polls have been withering on the issue of our reasons for being in Iraq since then. Any apology made now is well beyond the point.

Bush said:
"...the enemy doesn't stand for anything. They have no message of hope. They have no positive philosophy. All they can do is kill and hope that the government splits up, or that the American people lose their will."
America's will to do what? Our military presence for the past three and a half years has contributed to the Iraqi people's sectarian strife. If our "will" is to win hearts and minds, it's high time for Iraqis to take responsibility for themselves and it's time to end the U.S. occupation of their country.

A significant percentage of hearts and minds of the Iraqi population has been lost to us forever because of the way this action, never necessary for U.S. security, was led by the Bush administration. There is a civil war and an increase in the terrorists' presence in Iraq today because of the inept commander in chief. In Iraq, now that he has safely snuck himself under the radar of so many Iraqi citizens who'd just as soon target him than welcome him, he has some serious repairs to do. It's been three years since he visited anyone in Iraq. It's about time. Now let's see a change.

Bring those American men and women home from Iraq. They've served you well, President Bush. Bring them home with honor - and begin now.


* Bush's remarks to Prime Minister Maliki of Iraq sound more "PR" than a move toward any substantial change.

* LA Times: Poll: U.S. Disapproves of War in Iraq ' - The death of al-Qaida leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Iraq came as more Americans than ever thought the war in Iraq was a mistake, according to AP-Ipsos polling.'


Monday, June 12, 2006

Iowa Poll: John Edwards #1 for 2008



Iowa Poll:
John Edwards #1 for 2008


Senator Edwards: "It was a nice gift to see we still had friends in Iowa." - DesMoinesRegister.com

About the Poll - DesMoinesRegister.com: Experts say it's the first poll showing anyone besides Clinton as the preferred Democrat in the race for the White House.


NYPost.com: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was defeated by former Sen. John Edwards in an early Iowa poll - a rare blow to Clinton's front-runner status for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

One America Committee blog: Edwards Leads Dems in Iowa for 2008

The blogtalk (Google)

Even more blogtalk. (Technorati)

Sweetness - From David Yepsen/DesMoinesRegister.com:
The poll is all sweetness for John Edwards. The 2004 vice-presidential nominee is the Iowa front-runner with 30 percent. That, in turn, will help his fund-raising and his ability to attract top talent and support elsewhere...A victory for Edwards here in 2008 would make him the leading alternative to Clinton and give him an important boost toward the nomination.


Geoffrey Nunberg: John Edwards' storytelling ability is a real strength [Raw Story]

Sunday, June 11, 2006

America: Do You Want War, War and More War?



America: Do You Want War, War and More War?

Your President does.
Listen to Bill Christison, former CIA analyst. His most pressing point:
This writer's belief is that the only long-term hope the world has of avoiding a quite widespread further proliferation of nuclear weapons to additional nations in the coming decade is for the U.S. to undertake honest and serious multilateral negotiations aimed at eliminating nuclear weapons everywhere.

Unbelievable



Unbelievable

This headline made me want to scream "No sh*t, Dick Tracey!"

Juan Cole talks about the elevation for al Zarqawi from serial killer to legend because of the war in Iraq. Gee, thanks, Bush administration. Mr. Cole quotes what he calls a "chilling" exaggeration of al Zarqawi's importance:
'Thirty-year-old professor Ahmad Yassin said 'the martyrdom of the jihadist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi represents a grave loss for both the Arab and Islamic Worlds. We lost a great man who died defending the Islamic civilization from Zionist imperialism. I don't think this man can be replaced.' link
And Mr. Cole's informed comment:

Zarqawi would just have been a serial killer if he had lived in normal times, the sort where police are surprised to find hundreds bodies buried in his back lot, and suddenly solving missing persons cases in the region for years back. That anyone at all, much less a highly educated intellectual, could speak of him in these glowing terms sends chills down my spine. Because it means he has a legacy.
We need to rethink how we are "fighting terror." Unless the object is to generate more terrorists.

By the way, where is Osama Bin Laden, who they say actually masterminded the 9/11 attacks? Why are talking heads like Brit Hume saying that Al Zarqawi "eclipsed" Bin Laden in Iraq? Wait - I know. Because Iraq never had a thing to do with 9/11 and they have not been able to capture Bin Laden for five years.

I'm glad they got their substitute boogey-man, but if I have to see that dead head portrait with the two bloody gross-out nostrils once more, I think I'll heave.


One heartless, soulless ideologue says this today:

"The importance that the left
puts on capturing or killing Bin Laden
is almost laughable
."

Dear God. After 9/11. Imagine that.
Laughable.



On the road to believing any crumb of a lie fed to these soulless Americans by a leader they blindly follow, how soon they forget.
How soon.

Tar Heel Tavern #68



Tar Heel Tavern #68

Ron Hudson has hosted an inspiring collection of posts about Belonging at 2Sides2Ron for the 68th edition of the Tar Heel Tavern. Don't miss it!




Ron's own poignant post on Belonging is here.

I enjoyed viewing Ogre's suggested pictorial collection on his perception of Belonging.

Screwy Hoolie's message runs in the same field as my own. Long and strong may they run.

Jude is Elmo



Jude is Elmo




Elmo

Jude scored
54% Organization,
76% abstract,
and 52% extroverted!
(Take the test here)


This test measured 3 variables.
First, this test measured how organized you are. Some muppets like Cookie Monster make big messes, while others like Bert are quite anal about things being clean.

Second, this test measured if you prefer a concrete or an abstract viewpoint. For the purposes of this test, concrete people are considered to gravitate more to mathematical and logical approaches, whereas abstract people are more the dreamers and artistic type.

Third, this test measured if you are more of an introvert or an extrovert. By definition, an introvert concentrates more on herself and an extrovert focuses more on others. In this test an introvert was somebody that either tends to spend more time alone or thinks more about herself.

You are mostly organized, more abstract, and both introverted and extroverted.

Most people either love or hate Elmo. I hope you love Elmo, because that's who you are.

You are both somewhat organized. You have a good idea where you put things and you probably keep your place reasonably clean. You aren't totally obsessed with neatness though. Elmo has the same basic approach. His place is pretty tidy, but he doesn't spend all of his time cleaning it up.

You both are abstract thinkers. You definitely are not afraid to take chances in life. You only live once. You may notice others around you playing it safe, but you are more concerned with not compromising your desires, and getting everything you can out of life. This is a very romantic approach to life, but hopefully you are also grounded enough to get by. Elmo's whole life is based on fantasy and his imagination. In the beginning he was a regular character, but now he spends most of his time in this fantasy world.

You are both somewhat extroverts. Like Elmo, you probably like to have some time to yourself, but you do appreciate spending time with your friends, and you aren't scared of social situations. Elmo spends some of his time with real friends, but he also needs some time just to chat it up with his goldfish.


* Jude's test tracked 3 variables.
How she compared to other people her age and gender:
Jude scored higher than 24% on Organization
Jude scored higher than 95% on concrete-abstract (wow!)
Jude scored higher than 24% on introvert-extrovert

Photos



Digging through my pictures....



That's me on the Mayflower
sitting on a sack of rice
amid baskets and bush els



My niece gets really sad when the song Happy Birthday is sung.


Autumn, Ryan, and Me
Rochester NY

My dad standing next to a Shinto statue in Nemero, Japan


Baby Elvis, Baby Zorro


Sunset, Adirondack Mountains


Me - on a Christmas long ago.



My brother the cowboy


John with unibrow


I like birds


Back Yard




Me and Barb
Near Ithaca, NY


Cape Cod



Saturday, June 10, 2006

Belonging - Remember a Rose



Belonging - Remember a Rose



Sad is my heart for the blighted plants
Its pleasures are aye as brief
They bloom at the young years joyful call,
And fade with the autumn leaf:
Ah! may the red rose live alway,
To smile upon earth and sky!
Why should the beautiful ever weep?
Why should the beautiful die?


- Stephen Foster



As this week's host of the Tar Heel Tavern, Ron Hudson called upon us to post about Belonging. Lost in the business of our everyday lives, it can often become too easy to overlook the fact that we're part of something greater than ourselves, and there's a responsibility that comes along with belonging. Outer distinctions between our "self" and others need to be transcended before we can be aware of how our actions can impact the greater cause we choose to serve. Change in our world can only be made through your hands. You have the ability to create, inspire and influence others.

Many of America's Founding Fathers were Deists. As part of their belief, they recognized patterns of the natural world that were reflected in human patterns of existence. There's a sense of belonging in every natural form, from molecules to trees to animals and to the planets that round the Sun in our Universe. We live our lives according to the same natural principles. When the bloom of the beautiful rose begins to wilt and fade and its life cycle comes to its natural and inevitable end, no longer having the strength to support itself, it bends earthward and gently returns to the very place that nourished it and created its beauty. We look to the same place to see the return of the rose's beauty when Spring begins because we belong to the same cycle of life. It is no accident that Christians, who believe in the resurrection of their savior, celebrate his glorious return and transcendence to his heavenly father in the sky when the Spring comes each year. The sky, ever unchanging, reflects an eternal awareness - even though our thoughts and moods are as changing as the clouds that roll by. Watch the clouds and you recognize the shapes as something that calls to mind a reflection of your own thoughts or memories. We, as a community of man, are both the clouds and the sky; just as we are the waves and also the ocean. And each of us, try as we may, will never escape the fact that we are like the rose, ever-bending earthward with age while being capable of spreading such beauty in the short time that we exist.

Our nation was created with a collective mindset. There were many different views, but each philosophy belonged. Divisions were there, but the Delaration of Independence was the healer that shed great light on each individual spirit while representing a collective agreement to be free from monarchy. The Constitution made a protective statement about belonging and an agreement on the rule of law in light of the individual rights spoken of in the Declaration. Because of the Founding documents, we belong to a nation that was created to legally respect the individuality of each human spirit.

It's time to remind everyone of that legal respect for the individuality of each human spirit. Last week, I saw a contradiction that was so alarming that my conscience guided me to spring to action. Many of our political leaders consciously decided to risk the integrity of our Constitution in order to blow out the candle and darken the spirit of belonging and to snuff out the civil rights of a an entire class of American citizens: gays and lesbians. It would be a violation of both the first and fourteenth amendment to impose the fundamentalist right's religious views a large portion of the rest of the population and thus deny them equal rights.

Though the Senate failed to pass a motion to close debate on the proposed Constitutional Amendment to prohibit gay marriage, it received a majority vote (it needed 60 votes to close the debate altogether). It will now be considered in the House. I hereby affirm unequivocally my support for gays and lesbians to have the same legal rights as heterosexuals. I believe that gay and lesbian families should be given full support, not only because of equal rights, but because their involvement in creating lasting bonds of love and caring strengthen the level of love and caring in our society and strengthen rather than weaken family life. This is a question for all of us: Do gay families belong to the greater community of Americans or not? - And it is abundantly clear that they do. This is an important question: Does each individual member belonging to the greater American community deserve equal treatment under the Constitution? - And we see that it is made clear by the Constitution and the freedom for which we stand, that each individual does.

The Network of Spiritual Progressives have made a statement with which I agree:

The emerging models of families in the homosexual world also contribute to a new understanding that families are no longer defined by the models of the 1950s, but today come in many different shapes and forms. The key to family is love, and that love is at least as abundant in gay and lesbian families as it is in heterosexual families. Similarly, when homophobia is removed from the picture, children of homosexual families flourish at least as well as children from heterosexual families.
Our common goal should be to flourish - each and every woman, child, and man. If you walk through the world fully aware of the nature that surrounds you, you will find that not only does it surround you, but that you are an undeniable part of it. We belong to the world, each and every person is connectedness in nature, and we are all part of the same nature. Our capacity to love did not spring from a Bible or a set of laws. Our capacity to love springs from our nature and it is only in recalling that we all belong to the same web of life and cycle of death as the rose that will increase our awareness of our need to keep the American founding alive, defending equality and justice for each and every person living in this country and living on the face of the earth.

We should vote out of office any people (regardless of political party) who are risking the integrity of our Constitution while trying to divert our attention from the real struggle against selfishness and materialism in our society to the phony and hateful struggle against gays and lesbians and the pandering to the fundamentalist right.

Say "No more!" Keep the beauty of freedom alive, or all of the beautiful who have strived for justice - every last rose - shall have lived in vain. Hate and bigotry does not BELONG in a society of people who cherish love.

- Jude

*Dedicated to my mother Rose, who I lost last year and whose birthday is June 12th.

Larry Johnson on American Outrage



Larry Johnson on American Outrage

Larry Johnson had this to say yesterday at the Yearly Kos convention in Las Vegas:

this is an audio post - click to play


Chris Bowers on the convention
Crooks and Liars
DemFromCt (Next Hurrah)
David Swanson
Wonkette
Mahablog (*Barbara, I saw you on CSPAN)
Skippy (too many posts to pick just one)
Democracy Cell Project
Pam's House Blend

Friday, June 09, 2006

Geno's Cheesesteaks: Anti-Immigrant?



Geno's Cheesesteaks: Anti-Immigrant?


Geno's

I read this story, and I've got to be honest. I'm not surprised to hear about such a stupid rule at Geno's. You go there to eat and you're faced with political-tinged posters (ie: the anti-Mumia Abu-Jamal manifesto in your face) and the whole place just yells "We're right-wing Republican." Eateries aren't supposed to give you heartburn. As much of a political person as I am, I'm also a cheesteak connoisseur and I'm disappointed that Geno's would sink to this political level. I don't discuss or take bitter sides on the immigration issue among mixed company at my table, so why should I be forced to do so at theirs?


Pat's King of Steaks

I say screw 'em. To immigrants who are struggling with the language, don't worry. Not only will Pat's be willing to accommodate you in whatever language you're comfortable with, but their sandwiches are far tastier and they won't cram unwanted and divisive political crap down your throat with each bite you take. Besides, Pat's has the Red, Whire, and Blue sign.

Le gusta Pat's.


Media Monsters Mock Widows and Parents of the Dead



Media Monsters Mock Widows and Parents of the Dead

We have come to a point where we are so divided in this nation that the Right has had to resort to insulting the widows and fathers of dead sons of America.

Ann Coulter's many statements have revealed who she is, and I'm speaking especially of her interview on NBC this week where she happily defended her bitter denigration of 9/11 widows and the marital bonds they'd shared with their decesaed husbands.

Yesterday, John Gibson of Fox News publicly mocked the father of 26 year-old Nick Berg, who had been beheaded in Iraq, and continued to mock him after Michael Berg had hung up in understandable disgust.
MP3 HERE

The public debate, when it reaches this shrill, hateful, and uncivil tone toward those who have lost something so precious, hurts the ears of sensible people and reveals to every sane person in the viewing audience the monsters who engage in such disrespectful conduct.

Our nation is greatly diminished if we can no longer reason kindly with one another with respect for the poorest among us - those who've lost the most and have the least to gain by telling their truth.

People are naturally resistant to change. They will rail against opinions that aren't part of the government propaganda they hear day in and day out. But when a network that is in the business of spreading the propaganda invites a father of a dead American son to come on their network to not only use him as a straw man, but to make a whipping boy out of him, mocking him, publicly crucifying him, people are more apt to see him as a self-sacrificing agent for radical and loving change - not all that different from Jesus Christ in front of Herod and Pilate.

And we move on.

Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.


Wise Advice From A Young Graduate



Wise Advice From A Young Graduate


I wanted to share with you some words of wisdom from a young man who spoke at his commencement ceremony at Stonehill College in Easton, Massachusetts last weekend:

Class of 2006 graduate Charles Micah Christian urged his classmates to "take a chance for change" and to do so with "a fire burning in us … that water cannot put out."

Christian, a communication major, said the most important item on a tombstone is not the name, message or date of birth, but "the dash in between" the dates of birth and death.



It's all about the dash.



"The deeper meaning of this little dash encompasses relationships, change and growth, love shared, memories made, moments of pain and lasting peace, moments of tears and lasting joy, moments of weakness and lasting strength," Christian said.

"It represents the hearts that were stirred, inspired, moved and changed from your words and actions, and it represents the remarkable people that helped to mold and develop your mind and spirit during your everyday growth," he said.


25 Sexiest Novels



25 Sexiest Novels

Just in time for summer beach reading - Playboy's list of the 25 Sexiest Novels ever written. Get browsing!

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Zarqawi Death: Michael Berg Turns Tables on Media



Zarqawi Death: Michael Berg Turns Tables on Media

As the poet John Donne said, any man’s death diminishes me. It doesn’t bring my son back, and this will just bring a new cycle of revenge killings."

- Michael Berg


The Jordanian government made sure they got the justice they sought for the hotel bombings within their borders that their native son Abu Musab al Zarqawi orchestrated and supported. President George W. Bush is claiming all the glory in the hope that he will regain some popularity in the polls.

This morning when MSNBC's daytime anchor Randy Meier interviewed Michael Berg, father of 26-year-old Nick Berg who was beheaded in Iraq, I was struck by what seemed like a defensive nationalist stance on behalf of the network by its own anchor. I wish I had a video because that would speak volumes. Meier actually recoiled and retaliated, cutting Berg short on his comments when Mr. Berg commented that he understood how the parents and family of Zarqawi feel today, having lost a son. Meier quickly interrupted, as if he was responsible for acting as a right-winger in a hot-button political debate rather than an interview with the father of a lost son. Meier said:

"With all due respect, I doubt that Zarqawi’s family is going through what you went through. Since Zarqawi is now deemed a martyr by his family members and they are rejoicing in his death. I don’t think that they are feeling anywhere near the type of grief that you and your family felt."
My goodness. What an arrogant statement! I looked at an MSNBC on-line story which tells both sides and, for all intents and purposes, refuted the need for the overly (and odd) defensive manner in which Randy Meier conducted himself. The article shows the contrast between family members who privately grieve and publicly proclaim martyrdom for their lost son.

The mainstream media seem to have lost all sense of the meaning of morality and humanity when they speak of "values" issues from the perspective of two narrow issues: abortion and homosexuality. This interview between Randy Meier and the father of a son who was executed by al- Zarqawi was not handled with any moral deference to the man who lost his son whatsoever. When that man raised the possibility that another family might be mourning today, he was cut off. As a human being with values that lead me to see how war affects millions of innocent lives, I sat back and marveled at the moral hypocrisy of the American media.

The focus in the media that is put on human values is perverted because of the Bush theology to which so many misled people subscribe. Bush theology has nothing to do with real religion or faith. It is only a religion of nationalism and empire. I believe Randy Meier acted unprofessionally this morning. He showed, on behalf of his network MSNBC, that his network is more than willing to turn their heads away from objectivity when they are presented with a moral values challenge that throws Bush theology for a loop. To me, it seemed that Randy Meier acted more like an apologist for war giving a poor schmuck who lost his son some pity-air-time than an objective network anchor.

I think NBC/MSNBC should take a close look at their media strategy. Sensible people are watching. One voice from the right side of the blogosphere (who misspells Mr. Meier's name) asked a question for which the answer seems so obvious:
It’s easy for the cable anchors to criticize the extreme statements of Michael Berg. But the important question is, why, on this day, did they feature him at all?
Perhaps someone will remind this young Einstein that Mr. Berg's son died at the hands of al-Zarqawi.

Think of what happened just yesterday when we saw Brian Williams on the Nightly News giving plenty of prime time coverage to the controversy occurring on their own network when Matt Lauer hosted an interview with the offensive Ann Coulter, who took some of the ugliest pot-shots against 9/11 widows that I'd ever seen or heard. Shouldn't we ask why she was featured at all on a professional network - and why her filthy statements echoed throughout the primetime cycle?

We'll remain a morally confused people as long as truly decent and kind Americans are shut out, belittled, or cut off in public when a real challenge to the tilted civility balance is presented. Mr. Berg lost his son Nick to a man who engaged in murder. That murderer, Zarqawi, was the target of state-sanctioned vengeance. Mr. Berg proclaimed "Not in my name and not in my son's name." This statement rings of something so Christian in its nature that I am stunned when I think of our own society with so many Christians out there supporting what we have done in Iraq. The $25 million bounty on Zarqawi's head offered to some unsavory someone in the Middle East will surely be rendered unto Caesar by the Christian American taxpayer while they give their consent to continuing violence and human torture by their silence.

Mr. Berg pointed out that Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld had called Zarqawi's tactics "sadistic and medieval" while completely forgetting his own sadistic and medieval tactics used at Gitmo, Abu Ghraib, and God knows where else. Sometimes I think we've lost our minds here in this nation.

A dozen Zarqawis will come to take the place of the one. This war in Iraq, never even officially declared, is not in the best interests of the United States. The cycle of violence will continue because the "enemy" is embroiled in what they consider to be "Holy War" and the Bush administration's answer of violence for violence has not been a sufficient appeal to the hearts and minds of the only civilized people who could turn things around - the Muslims themselves. Our troops should come home now. There is nothing left to justify the reasons for our nation's military action as cited in Public Law 107-243 in October, 2002 (passed in the days when legislators made the grievous mistake of trusting in the President's honor and ability).

The Canadian Mounties uncovered a massive terrorist operation in their nation without removing one freedom from the Canadian people. The Bush administration has stolen many of our freedoms and taken our nation to an unnecessary and unjust war. In what is supposed to be the most powerful and just nation on the face of the earth, the contrast should shock you - and cause you to weep with shame.

* Cross-posted at American Street

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Karl Zinsmeister In The Blogs and News



Karl Zinsmeister In The Blogs and News

There are some days that I curse myself for being a pack-rat. On rare occasions, I am happy to say I'm a furious saver.

Karl Zinsmeister is a local resident who was recently tapped as President Bush's new domestic policy chief.

Last week I introduced you to the controversy surrounding his alleged unauthorized altering of an article written by Justin Park of the Syracuse New Times in Syracuse, N.Y. and updated you on the story.

Here is the snippet from the Syracuse New Times article that is in question.




Below is the cover of the August 18, 2004 edition of the Syracuse New Times picturing Mr. Zinsmeister.



In an update from Editor and Publisher, I caught something Mr. Zinsmeister said just one short year ago that has no fitting place among our references to reality today:
June 20, 2005, Zinsmeister, after another period as an embed, wrote, "What the establishment media covering Iraq have utterly failed to make clear today is this central reality: With the exception of periodic flare-ups in isolated corners, our struggle in Iraq as warfare is over....Contrary to the impression given by most newspaper headlines, the United States has won the day in Iraq.... the battle of Iraq is no longer one of war fighting—but of policing and politics."
I'm afraid that the Iraqi civil war is more than a series of periodic flare-ups in isolated corners of the unfortunate nation. Chopped-off heads are delivered daily to public squares. It's more like Murder, Incorporated than
'a-tussle-here and a knock-down-there.'

But do I really have to be saying this as if I'm trying to prove something to you that's already happened right in front of your very own eyes?

I respect Mr. Zinsmeister for what I believe is a genuine caring for the welfare of our troops and a patriotic spirit, but I don't have to go far to point out that he's overconfident in his opinion that this war is won by any stretch of the imagination. Is he writing as an intelligent patriot or as an ideologue? I leave that up to you to decide.

The manly-man bravado displayed in another statement made by Mr. Zinsmeister about the journalists who are risking their lives alongside troops every day in Iraq was not lost on Crooks and Liars. Think of "the appalingly soft" Bob Woodruff from ABC and the "whiny" James Brolan from CBS. It's funny how our past statements come back to haunt us.

At American Prospect's Horse's Mouth blog, Greg Sargent questions Mr. Zinsmeister's claims that he founded the American Enterprise magazine.

Where was God in Those Days?



Where was God in Those Days?

Jeff Jacoby wrote a thought-proking piece for the Boston Globe this week. Like me, Mr. Jacoby was a bit incredulous at Pope Benedict XVI's question asked when visiting Auschwitz, the infamous place where Nazis tortured, starved, and murdered over a million innocent human beings: "Where was God in those days?"

Mr. Jacoby said:
The God "who spoke on Sinai" was not addressing himself to angels or robots who could do no wrong even if they wanted to. He was speaking to real people with real choices to make, and real consequences that flow from those choices. Auschwitz wasn't God's fault. He didn't build the place. [..] It was not God who failed during the Holocaust or in the Gulag, or on 9/11, or in Bosnia. It is not God who fails when human beings do barbaric things to other human beings.
Perhaps the Pope understands that the Catholic church leadership stood stone-silent and it was a great moral misjudgement to have done so. If European Catholics who prized morality had witnessed that silence of the Vatican during those dark times, I would not have blamed them for losing their faith in the church as a gatekeeper of God's love on Earth. Perhaps many Catholics had regrets that they did not speak up when the Jews were discriminated against and socially isolated. By the time the Nazi voice had reached its fever pitch, it was too late.

I have to call myself a seriously doubting Catholic today upon hearing what I believe is a wrong-hearted message about God's love on Earth. I've learned from Raw Story that the current Pope has released a 60-page document called "Family and Human Procreation" that bashes gay family units and was, curiously, issued just days after Bush publicly supported a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. My heart and soul tells me that Pope Benedict XVI is very wrong when he turns the Catholic heart away from any loving family on the face of this all-too unloving Earth. The fact that the Vatican more than likely realizes how their document will affect U.S. politics turns my heart away from the moral path they are asking me to take. Make no mistake, a Catholic-sanctioned discrimination and isolation of LGBT families is just as morally wrong, if not as dramtic, as barbarism. It is an instruction that runs against God's love.

If I'm a sinner by loudly supporting loving and committed families, then I'm a beautiful and conscientious sinner on the side of love. For all his recent proclaiming of the importance of love, Pope Benedict XVI has lost my faith that he truly understands what love is all about by this recent document. "Where was God?" a future Pope may ask as he looks back on the discrimination, trampled human rights, and social abuse that gays and lesbian families will likely experience for years to come. I'll tell that Pope of the future exactly where God was. He was in the hearts of the people who truly believed in God's love and justice. I'll know I was right. Listening to our hearts and responding to the faith God has instilled within us is the only way for God's voice to be heard on Earth. Unfortunately, I'm quite aware that a lot more people will follow the Pope than to follow Iddybud. Then again, there was once one this loud voice in the wilderness......


Monday, June 05, 2006

What Kos Knows



What Kos Knows

I'm hoping to attend this groovy happening:




What Kos Knows

From Tom Watson's blog:

When Markos Moulitsas accepts the 2006 Drum Major for Justice Award next month in New York City, he'll be doing so on behalf of a massive network of committed activists who are changing progressive politics day by day, post by post, link by link, comment by comment.

On June 22, the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy, a progressive think tank on whose board I'm privileged to sit, will honor Markos and Anna Burger (Change to Win Labor Federation) for their commitment to American principles of government, activism, and democracy. To put it bluntly, DailyKos has long been an inspiration on the left - it's inspired legions of progressive bloggers to stop whining, pick up their keyboards, and create a movement. Indeed, DMI's own thriving policy blog - DMIBlog - is a direct response to the political activism of DailyKos.

So Kos deserves the honor, and he and the NetRoots movement he's helped to breathe life into deserve the support of progressive bloggers. To that end, we've started putting together a committee of bloggers to honor Markos. I'm pleased to say that the co-chairs of this blogging committee are a quartet of incredibly prominent, scarily committed, and genetically prolific bloggers: Jane Hamsher of FireDogLake, Steve Gilliard of The News Blog, Lance Mannion, and Ezra Klein. That's an all-star group representing thousands of daily words and many thousands of daily readers.

Bloggers - Want to join 'em? Go here to find out more.

Honoring Kos




Rick Warren in the News



Rick Warren in the News

There's a piece by Philadelphia's Tom Krattenmaker about Christian leader (and best selling author) Rick Warren in today's edition of USA Today. I particularly appreciated this statement:
Warren in recent years has avoided being painted into political corners. He says, perhaps too glibly, that he's not for the right wing, or the left wing, but for "the whole bird."
If that is the case, I'm afraid he's lost my faith in the honesty of that statement with his involvement in this turkey of a project. How very disappointed I am. He surely hasn't captured my "whole bird."


Politics

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Tar Heel Tavern #67



Tar Heel Tavern #67


BlogAsheville will celebrate its first anniversary on June 17, 2006

Don't miss this week's Tar Heel Tavern, "Anniversaries, Marriage and Acts of Love" at the Anonymoses blog.

In case you've missed recent editions, the links below will take you to other recent editions of the Tar Heel Tavern:

Last week's Tavern (66) was hosted by Erin.

Tar Heel Tavern 65 was hosted at Ogre's blog.

Bora at The Magic School Bus hosted #64.

Arse Poetica did a great job with #63.


Saturday, June 03, 2006

Stolen 2004 Election Must be Acted Upon



Stolen 2004 Election
Must be Acted Upon


Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman think it's great that "the story of the stolen election of 2004 has FINALLY busted into the mainstream media, thanks to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Rolling Stone Magazine." There is a "however" attached to that statement. It doesn't sound like they're willing to HANG until any further media follow-up or for the Democratic Party to actually DO SOMETHING "about the fact that America is about to be hijacked again in 2006, and then for the third straight presidential race in 2008."

An excerpt:
The massive article in this week's [Rolling Stone] focuses on the impossible contrast between exit polls showing a clear and overwhelming Kerry victory versus bogus "official" vote counts giving George W. Bush four more catastrophic years in the White House. It also details some of the horrific intimidation, manipulation and outright theft used by Ohio's GOP Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell to deny hundreds of thousands of mostly Democratic voters their right to a ballot. And it discusses in some depth the fact that Diebold and other electronic voting machine and software producers make it possible for any inside operator to use a laptop and a few keystrokes to flip an entire election in a matter of seconds.

It reminds us that the one good thing that can be said about George W. Bush is that the American people have never actually elected him president of the United States.
The media hasn't totally blacked out coverage, but the authors of How the Gop Stole America's 2004 Election & Is Rigging 2008 say the media hasn't produced nearly enough investigative or revelatory journalism. Structural changes to electoral laws alone may assure Republicans of more shady victories in 2006 and beyond.
In the past month, some coverage has finally surfaced in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Newsweek and other big media outlets on the vulnerability of electronic voting machines.

But we're still seeing just the tip of the iceberg. Most importantly, STRUCTURAL changes have been made to the electoral laws in Ohio and nationwide that virtually guarantee the ability of the GOP to steal our elections now and in the future.


+ Danny Schechter asks - Why is the Media Downplaying Our Voting Scandal?

+ A May, 2006 story by Wasserman and Fitrakis - Ohio 2004 election thief grabs Gov nod while (surprise! surprise!) voting machines malfunction


Politics

Friday, June 02, 2006

Taste of Syracuse




A TASTE OF SYRACUSE


I attended Taste of Syracuse, an event that takes place in the heart of the city at the Clinton Square Festival site in downtown Syracuse every first weekend of June. More than 40 great area restaurants provide a limited menu of dishes for sale as well as mini-portions for tasting which cost $1 each for each sampling.


__That's me near one of my personal favorites - Dinosaur Bar-B-Que.


























More of my photos can be seen at Syracuse.com.


Around New York State



Around New York State

What happened to NY State Comptroller Alan Hevesi? "Beyond dumb" seems to be a mild way to decribe his recent comments. Will this be looked back on as a moment of political suicide? Not if you ask the New York Times. where Raymond Hernandez and Conrad Mulcahy say:
Mr. Hevesi's remark occurred on the same day that Republicans nominated J. Christopher Callaghan, the Saratoga County treasurer, as their candidate to challenge Mr. Hevesi this fall. Mr. Hevesi is expected to win re-election easily.


According to the New York Sun, Syracuse New Times editor Molly English is considering legal action against President Bush's nominee for domestic policy adviser, Baldwinsville native Karl Zinsmeister, for changing quotations in a profile of him written by Justin Park and published in 2004 in the alternative newspaper. Post Standard staff writer John O'Brien gave the story full coverage in his front-page article of June 1, titled Mismatched quotes make mess for Bush adviser with CNY ties.


Senator Hillary Clinton will visit St. Adalbert's Response to Love Center in Buffalo today after attending a ribbon-cutting ceremony celebrating the opening of Buffalo's Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) Center for Genetics and Pharmacology and the New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics & Life Sciences.


Dan Maffei, who recently announced his candidacy for U.S. Congress from his home in DeWitt, will challenge incumbent James Walsh for the 25th congressional seat. Mr. Maffei served as a press secretary for Senators Bill Bradley and Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Bill Bradley will be right here in Central New York tomorrow, June 3, to join Mr. Maffei for an afternoon fund-raiser at Liverpool Golf and Country Club, according to the Maffei campaign. (See Frederic Pirece's May 22 blogpost at the Post Standard Political Notebook for more details). Don't miss the page of Memorial Day weekend photos at the Maffei campaign site.


The Working Families Party will hold their convention in Albany this weekend and they will be live-blogging the convention. One legislation they've been supporting is the Fair Share for Health Care bill that would set a minimum amount that large businesses must spend on employee health benefits.


The Humane Society is unhappy with Governor George Pataki's economic development office giving Hudson Valley Foie Gras, a factory farm that produces abusive foie gras, a $420,000 capital grant. On their website, they say that the process for manufacturing the product is "one of the most notoriously cruel practices in animal agribusiness" and "this large subsidy—funded with taxpayers' money—will pay for the expansion of the factory farm." There is a Humane Society campaign to revoke the legislation to support a ban on the "cruel product." The story has moved into the national spotlight, with a story focusing on the topic in today's edition of USA Today.


Richard Kirsch, Executive Director of Citizen Action of New York, is appealing to citizens to discourage the Senate from repealing the estate tax. The U.S. Senate may vote soon on proposals to repeal the estate tax or cut it by as much as 93 percent. Citizen Action is also supporting NY State Senator Dave Valesky's fight for the legislation (mentioned above in my mention of the Working Families Party) that would require large retail employers to pay for health care for their workers.

The Central New York Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO is informing citizens about the fact that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is moving forward with plans to unilaterally impose its last contract offer in bargaining with the nation’s air traffic controllers. They claim that this action may result in as many as one-in-four air traffic controllers retiring, putting the safety of air travel at risk. From the AFL-CIO blog:
"..the FAA declared an impasse in contract negotiations with the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) on April 5. Unless Congress acts by June 5, FAA Administrator Marion Blakey will impose the agency’s last offer, which could result in as many as 4,000 controllers, about 25 percent of the workforce, choosing to retire."


Although I have no weblink to this breaking news, I have heard that the Sheet Metal Workers Union has given their official support to incumbent U.S. Congressman James Walsh for 2006. With the realities of outsourcing and more recent layoffs at the Carrier plant in DeWitt, indications are that as the company completes a worldwide realignment, any Congressman will face uphill battles in politically preserving local Union jobs. Although they say "all politics is local", we have seen the national Republican party resisting any move to regulate the bleeding of manufacturing jobs from the American landscape. I tend to wonder why a Union would put trust in a Congressman who has no official Congressional vote on Labor recorded since 2001, yet supported CAFTA in 2005.



The Post Standard's Political Notebook blog has the latest news on many political happenings around Syracuse and New York State.

*cross posted to Syracuse.com

Politics

Federal Marriage Amendment: An Unwise Use of the U.S. Constitution



Federal Marriage Amendment:
An Unwise Use of the U.S. Constitution


I saw the oddest appeal on Town Hall.com today. The words stuck out like a sore thumb: “Marriage needs your help.” I asked myself, “Now, why would marriage need my help? I’m certainly no expert at saving marriages and if I tried to fix my neighbors’, they’d probably tell me to butt out and mind my own business.” “Marriage matters,” they say, and I can’t argue with that. Marriage is, in my opinion, a sacred institution. It’s a shame so many heterosexual couples don’t share the same fervor about their own unions as at least 50% of their marriages crumble like last week’s crackers. Marriage is a privileged state to which committed people are admitted when they meet certain conditions, and it confers upon those individuals certain privileges and responsibilities. That said, the people at TownHall.com seem to think that, if we care about marriage, we’d best sign their petition to “save it.”


I’ve listened to the voice of fundamentalist right leader James Dobson of Focus on the Family saying, "Marriage is under vicious attack.from the forces of hell itself." I heard him give strong voice to his personal fear of Western civilization coming to an end. Who is going to cause all of this, you ask? The answer, according to Dr. Dobson, is "same-sex couples." [the brief MP3 can be downloaded here] While I must respect Dr. Dobson's personal views based on his religious beliefs, I feel that he is a very irresponsible public leader and I certainly do not agree with his extremist views.

There are many voices coming from many individuals, each coming to the table with their own set of personal values opining on the topic of “marriage.” There is no one person or religious representative with the “right moral answer.” A diverse group of clergy and religious leaders met on Capitol Hill last week to speak against passage of the so-called “Federal Marriage Amendment” (FMA). Dr. Kenneth L. Samuel was present, and he said:

“If we want to protect marriage the answer is not in discriminating against a class of people. The answer is in putting our energy, our resources, and our effort at ensuring a decent public education for all citizens, decent health care for all citizens, and economic opportunities for all citizens. To discriminate against a class of people is wrong because a threat to justice anywhere is still a threat to justice everywhere.”


Columnist David Waters of Scripps Howard News Service, states that he believes that marriage between a man and a woman is not under attack by homosexuality, but instead by heterosexuals. He also comments on the timing of the proposal for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to specify that the definition of marriage is a union between a man and a woman.

We're pouring hundreds of billions of dollars, not to mention thousands of troops, into the quicksand that is Iraq.
- Millions of Americans are uninsured or underinsured. Millions more can't afford the health care they need.
- Gas prices are hurting every level of government, every business and every individual except the oil barons (in and out of the White House).
- The government can't seem to stop spying on us or lying to us.
- Our borders are about as secure as a screen door in New Orleans.
-Mother Nature is getting hotter and testier with every passing storm.

We've got big problems.
So, naturally, some of our political and religious leaders have something more important on their minds:
Gay marriage.
Must be an election year.


We must ask ourselves: “Is this amendment proposal really a pressing and dire necessity?” With all of the (many) pressing problems of a dangerous and wanting world, we see a hyper-focus on “saving” marriage by Republicans today. (And some of them have not been adept at “saving” their own personal unions).

I’d wager that most Americans trust that Western civilization isn't going anywhere anytime soon. I believe the GOP is looking to pander to the fundamentalist right, and we know that the fundamentalist right is obsessed with the emotional issue of homosexuality. They use the issue to keep high emotion at the forefront of the national debate about "moral values." For the overwhelming majority of Americans, the issue becomes a dividing wedge that blurs and delays an honest debate about our wide array of common values. We need honest debate now more than ever.


The last two suggestions made by Mr. Waters in his op-ed would make sense in today's America. (His first four suggestions, in my opinion, are highly debatable.)

Stop obsessing about the specks in the eyes of gay people who want to get married.

First deal with the planks in the eyes of child-bearing straight people who don't.

The majority of Americans today accept the reality of same-sex relationships without condemning or ridiculing the people who choose that lifestyle. When religious fundamentalist leaders demagogue the issue of homosexuality, it often results in a narrow public debate about “moral values.” If this narrow debate translates to a political consensus restricting the civil rights of an entire class of Americans, the political acceptance of this public denigration encourages further discrimination against gays and lesbians in our country. The feeling of just how wrong that seems is palpable in terms of the civil injustice brought about by such a narrow debate on the values that the majority of Americans share in our society. It's undemocratic.

I don’t think the debate about the definition of marriage should be turned into a food-fight where the worst of heterosexuality is compared to the worst of homosexuality. Instead, I believe that we should all call upon our government to define and protect civil rights for all citizens, including those of civil unions. It should be left to American church congregations in each state to define marriage, not the Religious Right or the U.S. Constitution.

Calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution on the definition of marriage will increase the likelihood that a significant number of American citizens will experience an increase in discrimination for years to come. The message that the U.S. Constitution is up for discriminatory “grabs” by any political party that temporarily enjoys majority status sends the wrong message. It sends the spirit of America's rich legacy of freedom reeling backwards. Discrimination and injustice should never be the result of a proposal for any amendment to our U.S. Constitution. It's not a play-document to be used by political panderers at will. It is sacred to the heart of American freedom, justice, and democracy. I believe that the current amendment, as proposed by public leaders who I view as no more than divisive panderers, is an unacceptable political treatment of the question of civil rights and we should not stand by silently while Republicans tinker with our sacred Constitution in order to rally quick and cheap conservative support for the November elections.

I'm going to tell my representatives how I feel today. I hope you will examine your own conscience and do the same.

*Cross-posted at Blogcritics.org

UPDATE:
See Carpetbagger Report, June 3 -

GOP says ‘I do’ to bigotry By Edward M. Kennedy, Monday, June 5, 2006

Politics, Marriage

Chris Trapper at the Redhouse



Chris Trapper at the Redhouse