Sunday, August 06, 2006

Bush Policy = Middle East Disaster



Bush Policy = Middle East Disaster

President Jimmy Carter: Bush has pursued 'erroneous' Mideast policy
August 6, 2006
USA Today

Carter said the United States should work for an immediate cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah and the world community should concentrate on a long-term solution, but he is uncertain whether Bush can accomplish a cease-fire. [..] "It depends on whether world opinion is strong enough to get the administration to change its erroneous policy, which has been to encourage the continuation of attacks on both sides," he said..


Carter: Bush Israel's 'worst ally' in D.C.
(same article as above, different title and link)



Beginning of the End for Israel?
Nathan Gardels' interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski
August 1, 2006
Huffington Post

In the final analysis, Iran is a serious country; it's not Iraq. It's going to be there. It's going to be a player. And in the longer historical term, it has all of the preconditions for a constructive internal evolution if you measure it by rates of literacy, access to higher education and the role of women in society. The mullahs are part of the past in Iran, not its future. But change in Iran will come through engagement, not through confrontation. If we pursue these policies, we can perhaps avert the worst. But if we do not, I fear that the region will explode. In the long run, Israel would be in great jeopardy.



Israel’s Actions Harm Iranian Democracy Movement
By Amitabh Pal
August 2 2006
Progressive


Bombs won't turn Lebanese hearts
By Ted Galen Carpenter
August 1, 2006
Philadelphia Inquirer



Crisis Could Undercut Bush's Long-Term Goals
By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 31, 2006


The Values That Will Shape Our Future
by Tony Blair, PM, UK
Outlook magazine Online (free registration required)

'What is happening today is..a struggle between what I will call Reactionary Islam and Moderate, Mainstream Islam ... We are fighting a war, but not just against terrorism but about how the world should govern itself in the early 21st century, about global values.


'A Moment of Opportunity'
By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Monday, July 31, 2006; 1:42 PM

President Bush's "moment of opportunity" in the Middle East is increasingly looking like an opportunity for disaster.

In case we all forgot, Americans are still dying in Iraq
by Jimmy Breslin
August 6 2006
Newsday
The strategy for the Middle East is to keep Israel and Hezbollah/Lebanon fighting. Keep all attention on them. If they ever stop, then everybody would look at Americans dying.


Rice Wallows in an Imaginary World
by Jeremy Seabrook, author, UK
Statesman, India
August 6, 2006
..the transcendent quality of their struggle becomes barely distinguishable from that of their foe. The re-making of West Asia is only part of a wider re-fashioning of this world in the invented imagery of the next, in which we must all learn to recognise, like the inhabitants of Beirut, the ruins of the only home we have.



Shirin Ebadi's Human Rights Group Banned in Iran



Shirin Ebadi's Human Rights Group Banned in Iran

Shirin Ebadi's Rights Group Banned
Written by The Media Line Staff
MediaLine.org

Iran's Interior Ministry banned on Saturday a human rights group headed by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi, the London-based daily A-Sharq Al-Awsat reports.

The Center for Protecting Human Rights was banned because it had not obtained a permit, the Interior Ministry stated.

"Violators of this decision will be prosecuted," the ministry warned in its statement.

Ebadi, quoting from the Iranian constitution, said that "non-governmental organizations which respect the law and do not disrupt the public order, do not require a permit."

Nevertheless, Ebadi stated that the rights group tried several times to obtain a permit, but the Interior Ministry rejected its request without giving an explanation.

The Center for Protecting Human Rights demanded last Tuesday an independent investigation into the "suspicious" death of Akbar Muhammadi, a student activist who died in prison last Sunday following a hunger strike.


Related:
Nathan Gardels' Interview with Nobel-prize winning Shirin Ebadi
New Perspectives Quarterly
May, 2006


Saturday, August 05, 2006

John Edwards: Send 40K Troops Home From Iraq Now



John Edwards: Send 40K Troops Home From Iraq Now

The AP is reporting this as "news", but Senator Edwards has been saying it for a long while - at least since last fall when he admitted that he believed he's been mistaken on having had voted "yes" to the Iraq War reesolution of 2002. Senator Edwards believes that America should make it clear (to the Iraqis) that we are leaving Iraq, and the best way is to start leaving. He says that we should take 40,000 combat troops out now. Bob Herbert made this clear in his New York Times column about Senator Edwards last June.
"There is no chance other countries in the world will help Iraq as long as we are an occupying force," he said.
He also said this on Wednesday night at Missouri State University's Public Affairs Conference:
"You can't lead if you don't tell the truth," he said referring to the Bush administration. Edwards said keeping large numbers of troops in the country sends a signal that the U.S. "is there forever and is there for oil."
A tone of agreement has been set by former President Jimmy Carter [USA Today]:
"In my opinion, we should make every effort now to withdraw American troops from Iraq," Carter said. "I would say certainly begin a major withdrawal no later than the end of this year."

- President Jimmy Carter

Senator Edwards has spoken out on the situation with Isreael's air raids and limited ground invasion of Lebanon with the aim to do damage to Hezbollah. In the New York Times, he is quoted:
On the Israeli-Hezbollah fighting in the Middle East, Edwards noted he was on the Israel-Lebanon border only three weeks ago, and said Israel "has absolutely the right to defend itself, though he said there "needs to be an international security force in southern Lebanon."
On the One America Committee blog today, he replied to a blogger:
Israel (none / 0)

thanks for your comment. i was in israel about a month ago. went to the lebanese border - could see the hezbollah outpost in southern lebanon. i actually believe that hezbollah and hamas were acting, at least to some extent, in concert in an effort to stir up hatred of israel and strengthen radical islam. we clearly need an international security force in southern lebanon.

John Edwards

by John Edwards


Min Wage Failure: Shame on Bill Frist's Republicans



Min Wage Failure: Shame on Bill Frist's Republicans

On August 3, the Senate failed to get the 60 votes required to end debate (prevent a filibuster) on the "trifecta" bill. This legislation (passed last week by the House) would raise the minimum wage, but only by also providing estate tax reform benefitting the wealthiest. The vote was 56-42.

"The Democrats have obstructed what heretofore had been their No. 1 issue," said [Bill] Frist. [NYT]

Not so fast.

The GOP deliberately front-loaded this obstruction.

It was nothing more than a cheap double-cross by Senator Frist's side of the aisle. Frist goes to churches on Justice Sundays and preaches about values, but like a hypocrite, sets up a scenario where the greedy gain mightily and the poor are made poorer. I've never read about that in Matthew 25. Frist then acts wounded when his chicanery fails and he's faced with a Senate filled with men and women of honor and a clearly better developed sense of American values.

The politics of blackmail, in this case, is nothing more than a political front-loading destined for failure in an attempt to rob the working poor of opportunity while making attempts to enrich the fat and happy.

Shame on Bill Frist's Republicans.

Tom Kean Jr. of New Jersey looks small in the Washington Post today, lashing out at Democrat Bob Menendez, his opponent for the NJ senatorial seat vacated by Jon Corzine on the minimum wage issue, apparently cheering on the mass Republican feasting upon the backs of the working poor for the benefit of the smallest class of American families who are already swimming in luxury.

I believe that Americans are onto this political charade. Many are disgusted by it. A look at just about any recent poll will tell you that.

Friday, August 04, 2006

Billy Shore Tells His Story Beautifully



Billy Shore Tells
His Story Beautifully




This true story, as told by Billy Shore [of the anti-hunger nonprofit Share Our Strength], is a moving narrative stemming from a unique experience. Through his accounting - from a fallen soldier to the simple falling of a tie, you are bound to the personal details as if you were actually living them.

This is what democracy looks like. Now what?



This is what democracy looks like. Now what?


photo credit: AP/NYT

What do you think about when you hear or see the mobs on the Iraq street chanting "Death to Israel"? How do you reconcile that with the Bush administration's stubborn defense that their foreign policy and the Pentagon's military embodiment and prosecution of that policy is "successful"?

To whom has success traveled?

In Saddam Hussein's Iraq, these Islamic fundamentalists may have been sent to prison and tortured. That would have been morally wrong.

So now they're free.

And they want death for Israel.

Think about where the Bush policy has led us.

He Just Wanted to Eat Elvis' Teddy Bear



He Just Wanted to Eat Elvis' Teddy Bear


I'm all shook up - a- huh- hmm- oo- yeah


Dog Destroys Elvis' Teddy Bear at Museum

He ain't nothin' but a hound dog.

You ain't never caught a rabbit. But you've caught a Teddy bear. You ain't no friend of mine. Don't be cruel.

Thursday, August 03, 2006

NY25 Heat Wave: Maffei's Race Against Walsh is Kicked Up a Notch



NY25 Heat Wave: Maffei's Race Against Walsh is Kicked Up a Notch

Rubber Stamp Walsh Votes for Bush Agenda 88% of the Time

Below you will find many recent articles about Dan Maffei, New York's 25th district Democratic challenger to incumbent House Representative Jim Walsh.

Last week, Dan held a press conference calling for a 'windfall profit' tax on oil companies in light of the recent revelation that Exxon-Mobil made a whopping 36% more, in one short year, off the backs of Americans at the gas pumps - a shameful profit at a time when Americans are having a hard time paying the bills. It's more than his political opponent James Walsh has done for the people of teh 25th district. He is also pushing serious research into alternative fuels (details here, scroll to "Manhattan project for energy independence").


Click photo above to view a Maffei for Congress ad called "The Plan"

Dynamic Vision for Upstate New York
The War in Iraq
Science & Innovation
Education
Health Care
Jobs & Economy
Environment
Social Security

from Maffei for Congress.com



House Republicans face tougher races
Boston Globe - August 3
...Entrenched Republicans are running harder than ever because of voter hostility toward President Bush and Congress. [..] Walsh, a nine-term incumbent who had no Democratic opponent in 2004 and whose father served in Congress, has dominated the politics of his New York district for years. But his pollster, Jeff Stonegash, said surveys indicate Bush's unpopularity could pose a risk to Walsh and other Republicans.

Candidates come together on stem cell research
News 10 Now, NY - Aug 1, 2006
...Two democratic congressional candidates joined forces at a news conference to discuss stem cell research. [..] Both Michael Arcuri and Dan Maffei voiced their concerns on the recent vote to uphold a veto on federal funding for stem cell research. [..] The candidates disagree with the way current congressman Jim Walsh voted, and say the research should be allowed to continue.

Note: Dan Maffei's speech on President Bush's veto of stem-cell research can be read here.
"I am disappointed President Bush vetoed a bi-partisan piece of legislation being supported by the vast majority of Americans including conservative Senator Orin Hatch, Senator John McCain and Nancy Reagan. I am more disappointed that Jim Walsh once again voted with George Bush, showing that he acts as a rubberstamp for the Bush Administration."

House Republicans come out swinging
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, NY - Jul 30, 2006
....The ads for Walsh and Reynolds don't address hot-button national issues such as immigration, the war in Iraq or stem-cell research, but focus instead on local, personal topics.
[It looks to me like Rep. Walsh is hiding from Bush and the national Republicans in the light of day - thinking and/or hoping no one will examine his actual voting record.]

NY 25th District: I like Walsh's challenger!
Daily Kos - July 30, 2006
...I would strongly and warmly urge all in Central NY (and elsewhere) who may be unaware that Walsh has a challenger to feel free to take a close look at Mr. Maffei, to see how they feel. For me, Walsh's votes to support "The Decider" (ahem, ahem) on his veto of federal funding for stem cell research, provide any additional justification (if I needed any) to hope he may soon become one of our soon-to-be "former Congresspersons".

Related story on the stem cell issue in Upstate New York here at WROC8 in Rochester NY - July 20, 2006
....Seeing as how he feels the president used props in the form of so called "snow flake babies" in announcing his veto Wednesday, Ramesh Padman brought a few his own, namely his lab coat and biology degree, to his one man protest Thursday outside the office of Congressman Randy Kuhl, who sided with the president, and presided over the house vote which failed to override. "Our congressman decided to put politics over science."

Gas prices continue to soar
News 10 Now, NY - Jul 27, 2006

State by State
The Hill, DC - Jul 24, 2006


United Healthcare Workers Union rallies for Maffei
News 10 Now, NY - Jul 20, 2006

Slate of lively races on agenda
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, NY - Jul 19, 2006

Upstate New York: A Wealth of Pickups
Daily Kos - July 17, 2006
...
excerpts -

This was the only Republican district in the state to go for Kerry in 2004; it has a PVI rating of D +3. This largely urban district, which mainly encompasses the Syracuse area, at one time was a Republican stronghold, though like most other Northeastern urban districts has largely been trending towards the Democrats, especially since the early 1990s. Since 1992, the Democratic presidential candidate has carried this district every time, although the people continue to ticket-split and give commanding margins to the entrenched, right-leaning Republican incumbent James Walsh. The Democratic opponent is Dan Maffei, who really doesn't have that much name recognition and has been outraised by Walsh so far by nearly a 5 to 1 margin. Even with this districts increasingly leftward voting habits, James Walsh is still popular with most of his constituents and is favored by most political analysts to win. I think it can easily become more competitive, though, by this November (especially if anti-Bush sentiment increases here in Upstate N.Y.)

Walsh foe's path to nomination cleared
The Hill, DC - Jul 10, 2006
....Democratic House candidate Dan Maffei's primary opponent dropped out of the race yesterday, giving the former congressional aide a clear path to the nomination.[..] "The 2006 elections are about changing the direction of the country," Capanna said in a statement. "The way to do that is to avoid a primary and to stand together in our efforts to defeat Mr. Walsh."

NY-25: And then there was one...and no primary
Daily Kos - July 10
...Make no mistake about it, Maffei still has one hell of an uphill battle. Walsh won something like 90% of the vote in 2004. But there's been at least one promising poll that puts Maffei within striking distance, and if he can afford to run TV advertising in both Rochester and Syracuse, he just might have a shot.

NY 25: Capanna Drops Out; Walsh Will Face Maffei This Fall
By Marie Horrigan - Jul. 10, 2006
...The 25th Congressional District, which runs from Webster to Syracuse, may have a Working Families Party primary between Democrat Daniel Maffei and author Christina Rosetti, who currently lives downstate and outside of the district.

More news briefs
Rochester Democrat and Chronicle, NY - Jul 8, 2006
....Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, on Thursday stumped for congressional candidates in upstate New York and raised about $35,000 for two Rochester-area hopefuls. Emanuel, who is steering Democratic efforts to try to take control of the House in November, held a luncheon fundraiser for Democrat Daniel Maffei in Syracuse and an afternoon fundraiser for Democrat Eric Massa in Brighton. Emanuel said upstate New York is a prime region for Democrats to beat longtime Republican incumbents.

Dan has garnered the politically-coveted and impressive support of many Labor unions in the 25th district:



Teamsters Local 1149, represents nearly 1,700 workers. The largest facility is the Anheuser-Busch Brewery in Baldwinsville, NY.

The United Food & Commercial Workers (UFCW Local One) represents 24,000 members in New York.

Communications Workers of America, represents 80,000 workers in New York State.
American Postal Workers Union Local 257, represents nearly 1,000 members in Upstate New York.

International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, represents 17,000 members in New York State.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 97, represents over 5,000 members in Central New York.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2213, represents nearly 1,200 members in Central New York.

Teamsters Local 317, represents 3300 members and 2100 retirees in Central New York.

SEIU Local 1199, New York’s largest organization of health care workers, represents nearly 300,000 workers, including 3,600 workers in New York’s 25th District.

United Steelworkers of America, representing over 10,000 workers in Central New York.



For those who are following the race closely, don't miss the Syracuse-based blog The Walsh Watch. [It isn't my blog, FYI]. See Extra Credit Assignment to figure out who votes with Bush 88% of the time and is unlikely to change anytime soon. Walsh's Minimum Wage Hypocrisy is easily seen on this post.

Beware The Blog



Beware The Blog

Phil Boas comments on the age of the blog at AZCentral.com. He makes the important point that not all blogs are equal. Stereotyping all of them as mills of gossip and untruths is not the fair thing to do in the case of many of today's online journals. Another point that Mr. Boas brings out is that blogs are self-policing. If you fail to fact-check, you're sure to be found out by your peers.

Turkey Moving Farther From US/Israel



Turkey Moving Farther From US/Israel

When a broken hipbone is set, you don't put undue pressure upon it because a re-break could possibly cause the kind of damage that could ensure the hip will never heal properly.

Think about the relationship between Israel and Turkey since the early 1990s. The spread of Islamic radical revolution has appeared to both Turkey and Israel as a threat since both countries' governments are non-Islamic. Both countries have a stake in improving international (and bilateral) cooperation against the perpetrators and sponsors of terrorism. Turkey and Israel have both had close relationships with the United States. The fear, on Turkey's behalf, that improved relations with Israel would have damaged Turkish contacts and interests in the Arab world seems to be coming real.

The public opinion in Turkey right now is bringing Prime Mimister Erdogan to the forefront calling for a ceasefire. Turkey has been very sympathetic and outwardly generous to the people of Palestine who seem to be isolated recently by the world because they've excercised democracy in their country, electing a Hamas majority.

In the case of the relatively new, delicate, and once-hopeful alliance between the nations of Turkey and Israel, you have the case of the hipbone on the mend (a fragile nation-to-nation relationship) and you have Israel's brutal bombardment of Southern Lebanon. Qana has been the catalyst for Israel losing moral authority, and there are some disturbing warning signals coming from the Turkish population.

MP Yildiz Resigns From Turkey-israel Friendship Group
....Serpil Yildiz, a MP from the Motherland Party (ANAVATAN), resigned from her post in the Inter-parliamentary Turkey-Israel Friendship Group, to protest Israeli offensive against Lebanon and Palestine. [..] In a petition she sent to the Parliament Speaker`s Office, Yildiz said, ``Israel has been trampling on all values created by the humanity in the history. Its offensive against Lebanon and Palestine has been gradually turning into an atrocity and massacre.`` [..] ``Unfortunately all powers, including the United Nations, have remained silent against those inhuman acts. Hundreds of thousands of people were forced to leave their homes. Hospitals, public buildings, tourism centers and crowded dwellings were bombed, and everyone including children, women and elderly became target of Israeli attacks,`` she stressed.

Deputies fleeing Turkey-Israel friendship group
...The resignations have now reached 25.


Israeli Families Attacked In Turkey
...According to Eyal [Yakar], it was the incident in Qana that affected Turkish treatment of his family [of tourists]. "After the bombardment of Qana, they changed, because, typically, they're very pleasant. People on the bus also swore at us."

Protests in Ankara against UN Failure to Stop Israeli Aggression
...A group of Turkish peace activists protested the United Nations in Ankara for its failure to stop the Israeli aggression against Lebanese civilians.[..] Some 60 members of the Civil Servants Union (Memur-Sen) gathered in front of the UN building in Ankara on Wednesday, chanting slogans against Israel and the UN, reports Trend. [..] Memur-Sen General Director Ahmet Aksu said Israel had killed hundreds of people including children in attacks on Lebanon. [..] Aksu condemned the UN for its failure to secure a ceasefire and to stop the Israeli aggression. [..] "We are protesting the UN for its failure to stop the massacre of innocent children." [..] The protestors laid a wreath at the UN building and hung a baby's soother on the door of the building.

Prime Minister Erdogan: Israeli Offensive Plants Seeds of Hatred
...Erdogan said the eruption of tension in the Middle East may turn into a clash of civilizations, and the United Nations (UN) faces a major threat to the peaceful principles it represents. [..] “If we do not raise our voices today and say ‘stop’ to this war and offer a peaceful alternative, tomorrow it will be too late. [..]Erdogan said the outbreak of violence in the Middle East and ongoing security problems have made Turkey impatient, and added: “It is a must that this war ends immediately. The sensitive balance of the Middle East can not stand up to tension. [..]

Strident public protests mount in Turkey over Israeli aggression in Lebanon
... Government and popular campaigns of denunciation and condemnation have become more strident in Turkey, with the advent of the twentieth day of the Israeli aggression against Lebanon. [...]Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul cautioned that the feelings of hostility towards Western nations were rising in Turkey, noting that "moderate and liberal people in Turkey tend to becom hostile because of these operations. [..] " The ranks of the peace-loving people in Turkey have united after the Israeli dawn bombardment of Qana in which more than 60 civilians were killed and a wave of anger in Turkey have surfaced.


Any fool, if they can see what's happening in the Middle East, will tell you that the new set of "birth pangs" being witnessed by Condi Rice is actually the Middle Eastern governments finding new ways to separate themselves from the U.S. and Israel because they can no longer work with their world view. [See Fethullah Gulen's post about the Abant Platform/OIC. See author/journalist Cengiz Candar's op-ed regarding Ms. Rice and the neocons of D.C.]

There's nothing like a bunch of fundamentalist ideologues helping our ally Israel to isolate herself in the heat of her passion in the middle of an angry sea of surrounding communities.

You sure don't birth no babies that way!


Hardliners in D.C., especially Dick Cheney and his band of neocons, should step back and allow Condoleeza Rice to do her job.


____________



Related:

An Appeal for Leadership
Why Hasn't the World's Lone Superpower Stopped This Tragedy?
By Abdullah Gul
Washington Post op-ed

Kate O'Bierne is having a cow over at NRO and using pretzel logic to lead only the delusional to believe that the U.S. should not be expected, by other nations in the region, to use the obvious power they have to convince Israel to stop killing innocent people and destroying their cities - causing 25% of Lebanon to be thrown into a grave humanitarian crisis. She accuses Abdullah Gul of insincerity, saying, "It's not a plea for the U.S. to take the lead."

No? It surely looks that way to me, Kate. I've been covering Turkey on this blog closely since this recent conflict began. I have no doubt these people are sincere. But - is Kate?
The U.S is reflexively denounced for acting alone to handle problems without the prior consent of the international community and then is the subject of whining and criticism when it does not take the lead in acting, even to the point of being criticized for not acting alone.
You can't convince me that this line of thinking is intellectually honest - or even rational.


I've denounced Bush many times myself for going half-assed into his Iraq madness without a plan or good faith international cooperation. I now call upon him, as Abdullah Gul does, to use every bit of power and influence he has to finally be the leader America deserves.

No matter how hard Kate O'Bierne attempts to "freedom-fry" Turkey as so many errant pundits did in the case of France circa 2002, it looks like willful ignorance to say that Bush doesn't deserve this blasting. He should have used every waking moment to get Israel to use some restraint before 1000 innocent people died in Southern Lebanon - many of them children. Perhaps political writers are totally out of touch with the hearts and minds of the people of this world. How can they be so blind?


Ref: U.S. Watches Dreams of Transformation Dissolve, an analysis by Jim Lobe


____________

I Recommend These Articles/Posts:

How to Bring Peace to the Middle East
by Asad Yawar

Arabic Books in the Markets of Istanbul
Lorelle VanFossen


UPDATE ON AUGUST 4:

- The Bush administration has responded to criticism levelled at it by Turkey’s Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, saying that Washington’s position was at variance to that depicted in an article written by the Turkish diplomat on the situation in Lebanon. US State Department spokesman Sean McCormack defended the US stand on the war in Lebanon during a press conference Friday. [MSNBC]

____________


- Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has an opportunity at today’s gathering of the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) in Malaysia to reveal Turkey’s role in ending the Middle East crisis, and express his thoughts over the possibility of deploying peacekeeping forces to Lebanon.Erdogan will return to Ankara after his four day trip to grant his official recognition to the Supreme Military Court’s decision regarding new appointments in Turkey’s military, reports Trend. The Turkish PM will have the opportunity to conduct mutual talks with leaders from other Islamic countries at this summit, in particular Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Erdogan is expected to organize a private meeting with the Iranian president after the summit, which coincides with a time of intense focus on Iran over its involvement in nuclear projects and its impact on Hezbollah. [Trend.az]

____________



- From an LA Times editorial Turkey's Balancing Act:
What Truman knew then holds true today: Turkey remains the physical, cultural and strategic bridge between East and West. Lately, it has been reasserting that role, even at the expense of alienating its old Western allies. The United States and Europe need to prepare for and manage the inevitable disagreements ahead while soliciting a greater Turkish role in the troubled Middle East, beginning in Lebanon. [...]
Regarding the benefits that would come with the acceptance of Turkey as a leading participant in an international peacekeeping force [Turkey demands an immmediate ceasefire before agreeing to do it]:
[...]Turkey would get a chance to boost its regional profile and pursue a more assertive — and popular — foreign policy while bolstering its ties to the West. Better to maintain a shaky balance than to lose the only secular Muslim ally the U.S. has.


_______


Ale Bulac asks: What Can Turkey Do? [Zaman] He answers his own question with his opinion:
The killing of a Lebanese by the Turkish soldiers even if by accident will deeply hurt us all. Public opinion in Turkey would not support such an arrangement.The public opinion in Turkey have to act with common sense on this issue.


What Turkey must do at this stage is first increase the humanitarian, (Medicine, food, clothing, water, and financial) aid to the Lebanese and Palestinians. Secondly it must take diplomatic steps with its allies the US, NATO and the EU, warn them on the dangers facing the region and potential consequences to all..Apart from these, it must follow a diplomacy that will motivate and encourage the Islamic countries, Egypt, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia, to form together an alliance hat will pressure the west for a just solution to the problem.


Wednesday, August 02, 2006

I think Andrew Sullivan's Giving McCain Far Too Much Credit



"You have probably seen our European friends say: ‘Well, the Israelis have got to stop.’ What would we do if somebody came across our borders and killed our soldiers and captured our soldiers? Do you think we would be exercising total restraint?"

- Senator John McCain
A statement that most Americans would agree sounds a little too "green-light" on behalf of a state's unbridled violence, considering the fact that a civilian population is being terrorized by war and a humanitarian crisis of monumental proprtion has been created. It's time to keep it real or give up our nation's reputation as a fair broker. Our "European friends" happen to fall in the same category of moral and ethical opinion as the rest of the international community.



I think Andrew Sullivan's Giving McCain Far Too Much Credit

When it comes to why a Democrat like myself has stopped supporting Joe Lieberman, Andrew Sullivan writes in such a way - today - that shows me that he "gets it."
The notion, advanced by Lieberman, that criticism of the president's war leadership is somehow inappropriate when the country is in danger gets it exactly the wrong way round, I think. It is precisely because the danger is still so great that criticism is so necessary. That's democracy's strength. You could understand, if not forgive, this abdication of leadership if Lieberman were bound by partisan loyalty to Bush. But he isn't. And even those who are - like Chuck Hagel and Lindsey Graham and John McCain and John Warner - have had more astringent criticisms of the the conduct of the war than Lieberman.
I'll agree with Mr. Sullivan on Senators Graham and Hagel.

However, I have to say that, having paid very close attention to Senator McCain since I saw him give grossly overcompromising support of Bush's handling of the Iraq war at the September 2004 RNC convention; and knowing that he failed to convince me that he would have a coherent plan for a "victory" and "exit" in the many months since, that his public questioning has been far less astringent than I would have hoped.


A Scenario I'd Regret to See

Iraq's a failed mess of a mistake - the worst strategic mistake in America's history. I strongly suspect that no venture - whether it's in war or diplomacy - will politically go America's way in this world again until we end the occupation of that country. Here's what I foresee if a McCain presidency should come to pass: It's 2009. The hawkish President, who has a son serving in Iraq [and rumors are that it's likely his 18-yr-old son Jimmy could be serving in Iraq soon] tells America that at least 250,000-300,000 more troops will be needed to tackle the dangerous instability in the Middle East caused by President Bush's failed foreign policy. McCain could have spoken up in 2004, but he chose campaign politics over honest criticism of the President's obvious failings. At that time, he looked us in the eye and dared to say: "Only the most deluded of us could doubt the necessity of this war." The military is exhausted. A draft will be required. President McCain will expect no dissent on the draft. After all, he always supported the war in Iraq. Americans voted for him because he believed that this war was always right [he said so without question in 2004 when we all knew the course was failing]. He will have a mandate. A President McCain would tell you that we should continue with even more firepower and boots on the ground and that your sons and daughters can expect their draft notice in the mail. All for American imperialism.


McCain Should Have Spoken Out Honestly in 2004
Hiding Behind Flowery Rhetoric in His RNC Speech Gave Bush Political Power to Perpetuate Failure

My disappointment in September 2004 upon hearing McCain speak at the RNC had much to do with the fact that McCain said:

[Democrats] emphasize that military action alone won't protect us, that this war has many fronts: in courts, financial institutions, in the shadowy world of intelligence, and in diplomacy. [..] We agree. [..] That is what the president believes. [...]

The President never utilized the style or the standard of good-faith diplomacy employed by all other American Presidents. Instead, he carried on on his own revolution of thugs, where nations who had any ideas of their own to contribute were shunned and the America's trust meant nothing. For too long, each American citizen's intelligent dissent over the Iraq war was treated as near-treason by Republican leaders. They should be ashamed to call themselves defenders of freedom for having done that.

By the time Senator McCain spoke the following words, it was already clear that the war in Iraq was never necessary - especially the way Bush did it. Yet, McCain heaped undue praise upon Bush, giving him political support to keep failing. It's hard to forgive Senator McCain for that. He should be embarrassed to have ever said it:
We couldn't afford the risk posed by an unconstrained Saddam in these dangerous times. By destroying his regime, we gave hope to people long oppressed, that if they have the courage to fight for it, they may live in peace and freedom. Most importantly -- most importantly, our efforts may encourage the people of a region, that has never known peace or freedom or lasting stability, that they may someday possess these rights. I believe as strongly today as ever, the mission was necessary, achievable and noble.


He said:
What our enemies have sought to destroy is beyond their reach. It cannot be taken from us. It can only be surrendered.
Yet, we've been losing more liberties with each passing year - surrendered - thanks to a rubber stamp Republican majority who would not assent to the fair oversight for which they owed responsibility to the American people. {McCain does get credit for pushing for the independent 9/11 commission, Then again, so did Joe Lieberman.

Senator McCain said,
Let us argue -- let us argue our differences, but remember we are not enemies, but comrades in a war against a real enemy...
The only reference to "enemies" I ever heard during that time came from the mouths of Republicans toward anyone who would not accept the obvious political manipulation and daily trot-out, even in the mainstream press, of outright untruths from our government about their 21-plus rationales for going to war with Iraq.

We aren't stupid. Senator McCain's not stupid - but I believe he was condescending to the American people in that RNC speech. He blasted Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary [for cheap laughs and some applause] - having never actually seen the documentary for himself. I personally heard Michael Moore's retort when I [and 10,000 others] saw him speak in Syracuse later in September of that same year. From my own journal:
How many times did we hear Osama bin Laden’s name mentioned at the RNC? George Pataki mentioned it once. Michael Moore says his own name was mentioned more (and received more boos) than Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein. Moore said, sarcastically, that he was glad the Republicans have their priorities straight. Moore says he felt a bit embarrassed for John McCain, who didn’t know Moore was in Madison Square Garden when McCain spoke negatively about him at the RNC. After the speech, McCain spoke to Chris Matthews of MSNBC’s Hardball and admitted to him that he had not even seen ‘Fahrenheit 9/11” for himself.

To this day, Senator McCain still thinks that the war in Iraq is a necessary and noble venture. I disagree. Millions upon millions of Americans disagree. He has underestimated many intelligent Americans - and he's done so at his own political peril.


See my reasons for doubting his credibility as a capable handler of Iraq.
- November 2005
- December 2005
- March 2006

I think McCain's a personable fellow and I know what he went through as a POW beacuse my great Uncle was nearly tortured to his death as a prisoner of war in the Phillipines and Japan during WWII. I consider my uncle and the Senator as brave and tough men for having survived their similar experiences. With respect, it doesn't make either of them automatic candidates for commander in chief. In the end, character really does count. I've seen Senator McCain waver on too many of his so-called convictions. His suck-up at Bob Jones University was just one more example of the marshmallow-soft center of his alledged convictions. Bottom line, I think he isn't much different than Senator Joe Lieberman in the sense that both men have underestimated and miscalculated the feelings and opinions of the American people.


YouTube Station Devoted to John Edwards' Political Activity



YouTube Station Devoted to John Edwards' Political Activity

There's a new YouTube.com station for videos [47 to date] of the public speeches and other related political activities of Senator John Ewdwards that have been created, produced, and/or collected by the savvy members of the One America Committee blog.

Double Cross:Family Values Hypocrisy in Congress



Double Cross:
Family Values Hypocrisy in Congress


Yonce Shelton, who has testified in front the House Ways and Means Committee on behalf of Call to Renewal on the issue of minimum wage, says that there's a double cross going on this week in the House and Senate. You can see his full article at the current issue of SojoMail. [Sojourners]

Excerpts:
[..]Last Friday, the House passed legislation to raise the minimum wage to $7.25 per hour over three years. But there's a catch. The bill (Estate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act - aka "trifecta" bill) would also permanently reduce the estate tax - an important source of federal revenue impacting only the wealthiest half of one percent of our nation's taxpayers, which also encourages billions in charitable donations (according to the Congressional Budget Office, between $13-25 billion in 2000). The bill would also extend other expiring tax cuts. [..]

[..]The House leadership proudly touted its "American Values Agenda" week in July, which included votes on gay marriage, the pledge of allegiance, abortion, and human cloning. Missing from that agenda was the value of promoting family economic security. Integrity of political procedure seems also to have been missing, which isn't new. Before last week's vote, a $7.25 minimum wage increase passed a House committee as part of an appropriations bill. Apparently that committee's values took House leaders by surprise. Stuck without an easy way to strip out the wage increase, House leadership has chosen not to move that appropriations bill forward until after the elections. By denying a straightforward vote and coupling the wage increase with other politically dicey provisions, House leaders are again choosing political charades over people and the common good.

If the "trifecta" bill becomes law (the Senate will vote on it this week), the trade-off for a minimum wage increase will be a sacrifice of other supports for working families playing by the rules but coming up short. Work must "work" - working families, individuals, and those unable to work deserve a living family income. They deserve to be treated with respect - especially by their elected representatives. They deserve an up or down vote on the wages for their labor. [..]

On the heels of this WaPo article, here was a discussion about the situation at the One America Committee blog yesterday, where many expressed their own opinions, including myself.

Bob Geiger rreports that the Republican bill to "increase" minimum wage will actually lower wages in seven states!

As it stands at 7 pm today, the success of Congress passing the bill in the Senate looks to be highly in doubt.

I personally question Senator James Inhofe's (R-Ok) priorities and values when he adnits that he “really hasn't decided” whether to swallow a minimum-wage increase in exchange for an estate-tax rollback. He can barely stand to see minimuim wage workers in his state making more than $5.15 per hour while he opens new avenues for millionaires to play welfare "Dynasty"-style and robbing Oklahoma of much-needed revenues that could benefit working families. Inhofe's statement makes me sick, especially since he claims he's such a devout Christian.

Monday, July 31, 2006

Act Now: Intl. Ceasefire Campaign



Act Now: International Ceasefire Campaign


Cease Fire Massacre
credit: Jude Rouslin/Galeropia



I received this e-mail from my Weekly Action Coalition partner, Thoughts of an Average Woman.





Dear friends,

Right now a tragedy is unfolding in the Middle East. Thousands of innocent civilians have been killed or wounded in the bombings in Lebanon, Palestine and Israel and the death toll is rising every day. If the US, Syria or Iran get involved, there is a chance of a catastrophic larger war. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has called for an immediate ceasefire and the deployment of international troops to the Israel-Lebanon border, and been strongly supported by almost every world leader. This is the best proposal yet to stop the violence, but the US, the UK, and Israel have refused to accept it. I have just signed a petition calling on US President Bush, UK Prime Minister Blair, and Israeli Prime Minister Olmert to support Kofi Annan's proposal. If millions of people join this call, and we advertise our views in newspapers in the US, UK, and Israel, we can help pressure these leaders to stop the fighting.

Go to the link here and sign up now!

With hope,
C.


I encourage you to go and sign this petition.
After you do, you may wish to read William Rivers Pitts' Cease-Fire Now.

Thanks,
Jude


Turkey's Relationship With U.S. in Focus



Turkey's Relationship With U.S. in Focus

See my post at THE AMERICAN STREET today.

Excerpts:

Academics from Turkish universities have urged their Israeli colleagues to “raise their voices” for peace in the Middle East as an Israeli offensive in the Palestinian territories and Lebanon rages on...Turkey has called for cease-fire in the Middle East and stepped up diplomacy for an end to the conflict. Thousands of Turks have also taken to streets to protest the Israeli offensive.

Turkey has strongly condemned the killing of innocent civilians, most of whom were children, by the Israeli army in the Southern Lebanese village of Qana.

In a New York Sun op-ed titled "Green Light," the ABC radio network's John Batchelor - who doesn't hide the fact that he wants the U.S. to crush Iran - sets up the scene for an Armageddon-like scenario in a world where Iran has already gotten the political upper hand. Personally, I think that this is a lot of speculation and fear, with Mr. Batchelor parroting Syrian and Iranian propaganda as if it's the gospel truth. There has been absolutely no sign of Iran provoking the U.S. or any other nation to take military action against them. Propaganda from both sides with no deterrent to war by nation states - no diplomacy - will likely give brutal war-mongers exactly what they desire. Bush has an opportunity now to talk to all concerned parties and his refusal to do so will only lead to a senseless war that, by his inaction, he seems to want. We can give thanks to the many foreign policy miscalculations, mistakes, and missteps by the Bush Administration for Batchelor's fear-laden scenario in which we'll either have to lose northern Iraq OR lose Turkey's alliance. As always, it's about the oil:
The supply routes from Iran to Syria are not only air lanes but also overland trucking on tribal routes through Turkey and Kurdistan. Turkey knows this and knows this is tacit support of the Hizbollah and Syria. More striking is that the Kurds in northern Iraq, ostensibly America's strongest ally in the liberation and democratization of Iraq, are openly cooperating with the Iranian military convoys. The Kurds have made a deal with Tehran that looks to the future and the establishment of an independent, oil-rich Kurdistan.[..] The Kurds aim to drive out or massacre the minority Turkmen in their territory, and they know this will be a casus belli for Turkey. The Kurds will need Iran for an ally and also for a transportation route to get their oil to market.
Here is where I think John Batchelor and others hungry for a U.S. attack on Iran are frustrated. The U.S. is not gearing up for war on Iran, judging their latest actions. Regardless of how frustrated so many Americans are with the images of dead women and children they see on their television screens at Israel's wanton hands, the U.S. doesn't appear to be hoping that the conflict will spread its instability over the borders of other nations. In his LA Times op-ed yesterday titled The Return of Turkey's Kurdish Problem, Henri J. Barkey leads us to believe that the U.S. may overlook a limited Turkish incursion into Iraq, likely led by the brand new head of their military, the "blunt-speaking hawk" General Yasar Buyukanit. The U.S. seems to want to keep their alliance with Turkey as strong as possible because of their needed participation in a peacekeeping force in Southern Lebanon. The Lebanese people have expressed a desire and trust to have Turkey as the lead-nation in any peacekeeping force.

Related Articles:

Related Article:

For Turkey, challenges - and opportunities? - in the current Middle East crisis [SFGate.com]

Key Country by Huseyin Gulerce

Tragic Partnership With The U.S. - Turkish Press/Mustafa Balbay

Rice's "New ME Birth pangs" Deliver "Daughter of the Mountain" - Op-ed/ K Gajendra Singh/Al-Jazeerah
Moscow will not let down Damascus .In the wake of ill conceived Neocon policies in Middle East , in spite of historical enmity , Syria has made up with Turkey , and despite Washington's displeasure , Ankara has also made up with Moscow and Tehran .Caught up in its quagmire in Iraq and now the Israeli denouement in Bint J'beil , USA at odds with Turkey ,is now trying to entice Ankara in its ME objectives, but the price demanded might be too high .


The New UN Force in Lebanon - Should TurkeyParticipate? - JTWNews.com

Sunday, July 30, 2006

Conservative Leaders Insult and Blame Katrina Victims



Conservative Leaders Insult and Blame Katrina Victims

Some conservatives are stooping so low as to put all the blame on the blacks who couldn't escape New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina because they were poor. Hearing them take stabs at the character of desperate human beings who were confused and living in their own feces at the Superdome while Washington D.C. virtually abandoned them is disgusting to me.
The Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson, president of BOND -- the Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny -- says many blacks in New Orleans were too dependent on government to flee from the storm.

He says that when officials then put evacuees into the Superdome, "within a three-day period they turned the dome into a ghetto." He says that showed "a lack of moral character."
Bill Cosby-izing Hurricane Katrina victims is about as low as you can go.

Listen to more of this crap:
Rev. Grant Storm, who is the Caucasian minister and president of Conservative Christians for Reform, echoed Peterson's view. "The mentality of 'government's going to bail me out. Where's the government?'" is "in the black culture," Storm said. "The mentality is instilled within their churches and in their homes -- of 'the government owes you, the government is your solution, and the government will come and help you.'

"When the government doesn't come and help them, frankly all they do is yap and complain," said Storm, instead of "saying 'Hey, I better go get a job, I better go on my own, I better go find an apartment, I better go take care of myself and my family.

Those who fail to realize what it's like for the millions of Americans who are living in poverty today who work for wages that will never afford them upward mobility [and will likely not even get them through the month without a shortage for things their families require] are completely out of touch if they believe that any government program today is to blame for "keeping them down." If they believe that the government owed no responsibility to these citizen-victims of Hurricane Katrina, and if they believe that expectations were not bitterly crushed and the chaos and loss of lives, homes, and jobs was the fault of the victims, I'd say that they are too elitist and too stubbornly ideological to possess hearts and minds worthy of American political leadership.

It is not poor blacks or any other New Orleans citizens who had caused the hurricane or the disastrous response of the federal government. We have to look at the breakdown of the emergency response system and at an economic system that rewards the richest while failing to provide social spending to empower and educate low-wage or unemployed workers.

What's next? Will these dolts blame weatherman Al Roker for Hurricane Katrina? It would make as much sense. Its all Al's fault for turning the Gulf Coast into a ghetto!

Tar Heel Tavern Edition 75



Tar Heel Tavern Edition 75



Erin did a great job on the Tar Heel Tavern this week. Number 75 is HERE.

Billy Jones will host next week's edition.

Turkey Proposes Peace Force With Conditions



Turkey Proposes Peace Force With Conditions

As I reported here on Friday, there is breaking news that Turkey is proposing a peace force in Southern Lebanon.

Let's not assume too much from this headline. There are stil reservations and conditions on Turkey's part.From Zaman.com:
Turkey is hesitant about the planned UN-led military force, and Ankara will not participate in an international force if the clashes with Hezbollah continue.

Before engaging their forces, Turkey would also require that Hezbollah agree to the implementation of the UN’s decision to disarm them. [Do we really think this will happen anytime soon?]

In response to Zaman’s questions, diplomatic sources revealed, “We will not rush soldiers to embattled areas.”[..]


There are other voices from the peace conference held recently in Rome, and the following is an example of just how hard this is going to be. The goal of the U.S. to disarm Hezbollah without acknowledging them or Syria in international discussions; obtain a UN agreement; and create an international peacekeeping force while completely avoiding the requiring of Israel to cease-fire is looking pie-in-the-sky- especially since the most recent development where every country in the world except the U.S. is publicly expressing repulsion upon seeing Israel randomly killing innocent women and children:
[..]In response to the question “What would Turkey’s attitude be if the mission of implementing the UN peace force includes disarming Hezbollah,” Ankara replied, “It depends on the parties’ (including Hezbollah) positive approach.”

Foreign Affairs officials on the other side responded: “The UN decision regarding the international force will be taken first. States are free to join. The direction, time and the mission of the force are crucial. A force, which will have an active role when weapons are laid down and the ceasefire starts, should keep the peace in the region.”


My question still stands: What concession will Turkey get from the U.S. for their participation - and will it inflame passions amongst the Kurds [specifically PKK] in northern Iraq? As always, oil is the material for which the forces of greed and the lure of power will walk over the human rights of any proud population who stands in the way.
With the opening of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyan pipeline on July 14, and the pumping of Iraqi crude to begin in a few days, Turkey's hopes of becoming a key player in the global oil industry is closer.
Listen to the fear and frustration from a Kurdish doctor who is beginning to lose faith in the U.S. support of a system that fairly addresses human rights in their dealings with Turkey [because of the conflict in Lebanon]:
"....the Israeli Terror holocaust is not sparing anybody in Lebanon in their killing and destructive attacks. The Islam-inclined Turkish government was very careful not to raise its voice against those crimes. That spells danger to me for Turkey may well be tempted to follow the Israeli example and attack Kurdish populations in the south to force the PKK into surrendering and disarming."

On Meet the Press today, a Lebanese representative said that he wished world leaders would use their brainpower instead of their firepower. There's the soundbite that says it all. In international relations and support for healthy Western-firendly democracies in other nations, Bush is losing Lebanon because he cannpt reconcile his seemingly blind support for Israel, regardless of their wanton bombings in Southern Lebanon. His administration is now risking international relations with Turkey. How could this have happened? To say that Iraq is not related would be a deadly error of judgement when looking at the overall picture of where the failed Bush foreign policy has taken us. If U.S. citizens have lost the democratic power to demand a change in the course, I'm afraid there may be no outcome other than a new and deadly world war with the United States as a tepid international influence because of a president who never took the advice of the best and brightest minds.


Related Articles:

For Turkey, challenges - and opportunities? - in the current Middle East crisis [SFGate.com]

The Return of Turkey's Kurdish Problem [LA Times op-ed by Henri J. Barkey]


Saturday, July 29, 2006

James Zogby's Advice on Middle East



James Zogby's Advice on Middle East

"You cannot exact this kind of pain and this kind of suffering without it creating a reaction at some point down the road."


CSPAN - James Zogby, Arab American Institute, President, offers his perspective on the current conflict between Israel and Lebanon. In a recent op-ed, Mr. Zogby criticized those who reject calling for a ceasefire because it would be perceived as a sign of weakness.


"You cannot have a military solution to what is essentially a political problem."


James Zogby - What Must Be Done in Lebanon

From yesterday's Washington Post:
“I’m devastated,” said James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, in Washington. “I thought we’d come further. We’re doing well, so far, in terms of our capacity to deal with everything from the humanitarian crisis to identifying families and working to get people out. What is distressing is the degree to which this neoconservative mindset has taken hold of the policy debate. It’s like everyone has drunk the Kool-Aid.”

Spiritual Progressives Raise $$ For News Ad on Middle East



Spiritual Progressives Raise $$ For News Ad on Middle East

Friday's Washington Post:
The most coordinated dissent by American Jews so far is a campaign by the liberal Tikkun magazine and the Network of Spiritual Progressives, both founded by Rabbi Michael Lerner in Berkeley, Calif., to raise money for newspaper advertisements calling for a cease-fire by both sides and an international peace conference.
The content of the newspaper advertisement (from an e-mail received last week):



STOP THE SLAUGHTER IN LEBANON, ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES!

Convene an International Middle East Peace Conference to Impose a Just, Equitable and Lasting Settlement on All Parties

In the name of our sisters and brothers suffering and dying in Lebanon, Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, we, the undersigned religious leaders, scholars, academics, cultural leaders, poets, writers, philanthropists, social change activists, and citizens of the world demand that the Israeli government, the leaderships of Hezbollah and Hamas, the U.S. Government, the international community and the United Nations immediately take the following steps to stop the war in these countries:

1. We demand that the Israeli government immediately halt its attacks on Lebanon. We join with the Israeli peace movement and the thousands of Israelis who demonstrated against this war in Tel Aviv on July 22, 2006 in their insistence that these attacks are utterly disproportionate to the initial provocation by Hezbollah, have killed innumerable innocent civilians, displaced half a million people, destroyed billions of dollars of Lebanon's infrastructure, and will not, in the long run, secure peace or security for Israel. We also call on the Israeli government to supply food, electricity, water and funds to repair the humanitarian crisis caused by its invasion of Gaza

2. We demand that Hezbollah and Hamas immediately stop shelling or otherwise engaging in violence against Israel. These actions, which have killed numerous Israeli civilians, terrorized the people of Israel and damaged many towns and cities, played a central role in provoking the current crisis, and do nothing but harm the cause of Palestinian and Lebanese independence and democracy. It is this kind of violence which has over the years pushed many decent Israelis into the hands of its most militaristic and paranoid political leaders.

3. We demand that the U.S. government and governments around the world call on Israel, Hezbollah and Hamas to observe an immediate ceasefire, place an immediate embargo on all shipments of weapons to all parties in the war (including Syria and Iran), and join an international conference to provide security on the border between Israel and Lebanon. By endorsing Israel's attacks and explicitly giving it time to do more damage to the people of Lebanon, the U.S. government has become a party to this violence, which, together with American military actions in Iraq, is sure to create enmity towards the U.S. and Israel in the Muslim world for generations to come.

These are the minimum steps necessary to stop the violence and the humanitarian disaster in southern Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. But these steps alone will not ensure that the region doesn’t return to an untenable status quo which will again eventually break into violence and new rounds of warfare.

We therefore also issue:

A Call for Lasting Peace

We call upon the international community to hold an International Peace Conference to impose a fair and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and to the conflict between Israel and other states in the region. Why do we say “impose”? There are too many forces in each country in the region who are committed to continuing this struggle forever. Their provocations will continue until the international community stops the violence once and for all and imposes conditions of peace that will allow the peace and reconciliation forces in each country to flourish.

Such a solution would be based on the following conditions:

a. The creation of an economically and politically viable Palestinian state (roughly on the pre-1967 borders with minor border modifications mutually agreed upon between Israel and Palestine); and simultaneously the full and unequivocal recognition by Palestinians and the State of Palestine and all surrounding Arab states of the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state offering full and equal rights to all of its non-Jewish citizens;

b. An international consortium to provide reparations for Palestinians who have lost homes or property from 1947 to the present, and reparations for Jewish refugees from Arab states from 1947-1967;

c. A long-term international peacekeeping force to separate Hezbollah and Israel in southern Lebanon and to protect Israel and Palestine from each other and from other forces in the region who might seek to control or destroy either state; and

d. The quick imposition of robust sanctions against any party that refuses to sign or violates these agreements.

A New Spirit of Open-Heartedness and Reconciliation

We know that no political solution can work without a change of consciousness that minimally includes an open-heartedness and willingness to recognize the humanity of the Other, and repentance and atonement for the long history of insensitivity and cruelty to the other side.

Both sides must take immediate steps to stop the discourse of violence and demeaning of the other in their media, their religious institutions, and their school text books and educational systems. They should implement this by creating a joint authority with each other and with moral leaders in the international community who can supervise, and if necessary, replace those in positions of power in both societies who continue to use the public institutions of the society to spread hatred or nurture anger at the other.

Once the other parts of a lasting peace have been set in place, we call upon the parties to this struggle to launch a Truth and Reconciliation Commission, following the model used in South Africa.


Use This Moment to Challenge the Paranoid and Cynical “Political Realism” That Generates Endless Wars

The paranoid and allegedly “realistic” version of global politics asserts that we live in a world in which our safety can only be achieved through domination, or others will seek to dominate us first. Of course, when we act on this assumption, it becomes self-fulfilling.

We propose, instead, a strategy of generosity—to act on the assumption that people have an enormous capacity for goodness and generosity (without negating the truth that certain conditions promote fear, anger and hatred which sometimes are expressed in horribly destructive ways). For the U.S. and other G8 countries, we call for a Global Marshall Plan: for each of the next twenty years, the U.S. and other G8 countries should dedicate 5% of their Gross Domestic Product to eliminating global (and domestic) hunger, homelessness, poverty, inadequate health care and inadequate education for the peoples of the world. This would have to be carefully monitored and apportioned in ways that ensure the care reaches the people for whom it was intended. But what is critical is the spirit in which it is done.

Similarly, we urge Israel not only to return to its 1967 borders (with minor border modifications mutually agreed upon including a sharing of Jerusalem and of its holy sites) but to do so in a spirit of generosity and caring for the other before it is forced to return to those borders by the international community and before thousands more young Israelis and Palestinians die in these senseless wars that will otherwise continue in the coming years.

The only protection that we in the advanced industrial countries of the world can ever really have for our lives is to spread a spirit of love so powerful and genuine that it becomes capable of reducing the anger that has justifiably developed against the powerful and the wealthy of the world.

The “cynical realists” claim that others are entrenched in their hatefulness, and that war and domination is the only way to battle them. This kind of thinking has led to five thousand years of people fighting wars in order to “end all wars”—and it has not worked. It’s time now to try a new strategy of generosity, both economic generosity and generosity of spirit. As stated above, there will first have to be a transitional period in which real military protections are available to people on all sides of the struggle. But by beginning now to simultaneously commit our economic resources and change the way that we talk about those whom we previously designated as “enemies,” we can begin the long process of thawing out angers that have existed for many generations.

Nothing can redeem the deaths and suffering that all sides have faced in this struggle for the past 120 years. But this very moment could also be the time in which the human race realizes the futility of violence and comes together not only to impose a lasting solution for the Middle East, but to begin a new era and to recognize that our own well-being depends on the well-being of everyone else on the planet. The International Middle East Peace Conference should be structured to achieve this end—which means it should have an explicit psychological and spiritual dimension and a visionary agenda.


We Affirm the Sacredness of All Human Beings

This is the moment to begin to make that real. The U.N. raised these possibilities 61 years ago, but relied on political arrangements while ignoring the need to simultaneously build ethical and spiritual solidarity among the people of the world, resolutions that most people never even heard about, a system that represented the elites of countries around the world but not necessarily the will of their own people, and fell into politicizing every issue. We need to strengthen international institutions that move in a new direction, but we also need a commitment of the heart from everyone on the planet. Our own countries must take the lead in a whole new approach to security and well-being. This may well be the last chance we in the advanced industrial societies have to avoid international catastrophe (either environmental or nuclear) by modeling something else besides brute power, military might, and indifference to the well-being of others. If not now, when?

Unrealistic? Nope. What has proved unrealistic time and again—whether we are talking about US policy in Vietnam and Iraq or Israeli and Arab policies in the Middle East— is the fantasy that one more war will put an end to wars. The path to peace must be a path of peace.

Religious and spiritual leaders are also making a global call for ten days of prayer and fasting toward the aim of peace, reconciliation, and ending violence, beginning July 27th and continuing through August 6th.

Signed by:

Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, Tikkun and chair, The Network of Spiritual Progressives
Annie Lamott, author, Operating Instructions: A Journal of My Son’s First Year
Nan Fink, original publisher of Tikkun
Rabbi Arthur Waskow, chair, The Shalom Center
Prof. Cornel West, Professor of Religion, Princeton University
Rev. Tony Campolo, Evangelical Association for Promotion of Education
Robyn Thomas, former executive director, Tikkun Community/NSP

(Space permitting, your name and identification, plus the names of hundreds of others.)

Click here to view the ad as a PDF file
Actual size will be full page in the New York Times


Please click here to add your name as a signatory to this statement and to make an online credit card contribution.




Friday, July 28, 2006

Will U.S. Christians Listen to Christian Bishop in Jerusalem?



Will U.S. Christians Listen to This Christian Bishop in Jerusalem?

A Christian Anglican Bishop in Jerusalem calls out to Christians around the world:



....Write every elected official you know. Write to your news media. Speak to your congregation, friends, and colleagues about injustice and the threat of global war. If Syria, Iran, the United States, Great Britain, China and others enter into this war - the consequence is incalculable. Participate in rallies and forums. Find ways that you and your churches can participate in humanitarian relief efforts for the region. Contact us and
let us know if you stand with us. I urge you not to be like a disciple watching from afar.

2 Corinthians 6.11:

“We have spoken frankly to you Corinthians, our heart is wide open to you. There is no restriction in our affections, but only in yours. In return - I speak as to children - open wide your hearts also.”

In, with, and through Christ,
The Rt. Rev. Riah H. Abu El-Assal
Anglican Bishop in Jerusalem



Hat tip to Juan Cole


Will Turkey Be the Next Problem for America's Interests in Iraq?



Will Turkey Be the Next Problem for America's Interests in Iraq?

Less becomes morally clear as Bush and Blair stall on declaring an immediate cease fire in Lebanon. In a press conference today, it seemed to me that perhaps Tony Blair was forseeing the destruction of the entire Middle East if Bush were left to be Israel's sole (blind) supporter and therefore elected to stand by his side in order to bring a modicum of sanity to the discussion. The problem was, he failed to convince me. A trip to the United Nations to press for action on Resolution 1559 will mean weeks or perhaps even months of more death and destruction in Lebanon at the hands of an unbridled Israel. The offer to build new homes for those who have been spared death by the bombings in Lebanon rings hollow when bombs are still falling. One look at Iraq will tell you how well Bush's vision has progressed there. It's not working out. I'm convinced that neither leader, Blair or Bush, is on the right course, and to hear Blair's mea culpa about his own errors in pre 9-11 leadership must have made former President Bill Clinton shiver with pain and disappointment.

Bush keeps saying he wants to get to the root causes of the problem in the Middle East, but he falls short of realistically or honestly discussing them. As long as he remains on a fundamentalist foreign policy course where you don't talk to the people you see as your enemies - because they are inferior, "evil" or "hateful", you will always have a one-sided solution that will serve no justice for the cause of human rights. Hearts and minds are what have always needed to be won, and Bush is breaking hearts and blowing minds every day with a policy that leaves no room for political solutions - only endless war.

I'm afraid we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg, but the war we began and handled woefully wrong in Iraq, now combined with increased anger at the U.S. for its blind support of Israel and with increased instability between Israel and Lebanon, is sure to spread both outward and inward and break that country into pieces.

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul last week summoned the US and Iraqi ambassadors to warn them that Ankara would act in self-defence if effective measures were not taken to end the presence in northern Iraq of the PKK (Kurdistan Workers Party). Turkey opposes the Kurdish demand for quasi-independence and their claim to the city of Kirkuk (in Iraq) and its oilfields. Turkey believes that Iraq's territorial integrity needs to be protected; that Iraq's natural riches belong to all the people of Iraq; that supremacy of ethnic and religious groups over each other should be prevented; and that the disputed city of Kirkuk should be given a special status.

What's happening in Lebanon is having an effect an the Turkish street, and U.S. economic interests could be negatively affected by Turkish instability and war in northern Iraq.

The support given by the US administration for Israel’s massive assault on Lebanon – and the understanding shown by the rest of the G8 – have compounded Turkish premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s difficulty in containing domestic pressure to disregard US and EU warnings against a cross-border operation to root out PKK bases in northern Iraq.

Even before the weekend attacks, Erdogan had difficulty in making himself heard in his home town of Rize (on the Black Sea) where a large crowd shouted abuse at the United States and Israel.

Accused of indecision by the opposition and pressed by his own supporters, Erdogan has to respond to the demand for national self-assertion, in spite of the misgivings expressed privately by some of his ministers.

Turkish patrols cross the Iraqi border frequently in pursuit of the PKK and they also have observation posts in Iraqi Kurdistan. If this Middle Eastern war continues to burn with no hope for moral, realistic, or hopeful leadership from the West, how long do you suppose it will be before an all-out war breaks out with Turkey as an aggressor in northern Iraq?

Fu'ad Husayn, an adviser to the Kurdish autonomous region's President Mas'ud Barzani, doesn't appear to have been kept "in the loop." If he knew about any recent trilateral meetings held between the United States, Iraq, and Turkey (about Kurdish interests without the Kurds' participation), he isn't admitting it (the bold lettering below is my emphasis):

Husayn: Baghdad is the capital of Iraq and we [Kurds] are also in Baghdad. Baghdad is not far away from us. I think it would be good if any kind of conflict or misunderstanding would be solved through negotiations around a table. We will support negotiations, we will support any talks.

But of course, we must be informed about the talks and the agenda must not be against the Kurds. We are part of this country; we are part of the Iraqi system. If there is any negotiation in Baghdad about the intervention...the Kurds must be there, and the Kurds must be informed about it.

RFE/RL: But as of now, Kurdish officials are not taking part in these talks?

Husayn: I can't comment on that because I don't have that information. But I didn't hear that a meeting is going on in Baghdad.

RFE/RL: This was reported widely in the Turkish press. There are also unconfirmed reports in the Turkish press this week that the United States has agreed to take action by bombing the Qandil Mountain range.

Husayn: I don't think this information is correct.

RFE/RL: So, you're not worried that the United States would take unilateral steps against the PKK without consulting the Kurds.

Husayn: No, I think one must be realistic if one knows the area...and the relationship between the U.S. and the Kurdish authorities here. I think the information which has been published in the Turkish press is not right.



Turkey Wanted for Lead An International Peacekeeping Force in Lebanon

If there is to be an international peace force in Lebanon, the Lebanese people say they want Turkey to lead it, and Turkey has listed its own conditions for being a part of that force.

Turkey may win some political points from Washington D.C., since they will be dependent upon Turkey's assistance with the crisis in Southern Lebanon.
Ali H. Aslan:

I don’t think that the Bush-Erdogan telephone traffic was focused primarily on the PKK. The Israel-Lebanon crisis must have been the top priority. However, Turkey’s opening its arms to American citizens evacuated from Lebanon when Cyprus’s maximum capacity was filled must have reminded once again those at the top of the Bush administration of the value of Turkey’s friendship in this troubled geographical region. Even if the importance of our relationship has been written down in the “shared (strategic) vision” document, practical benefits become obvious in such dark days
Will a Kirkuk that belongs to all of Iraq come as part of their reward?



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mark Mejia Article on Sibel Edmonds Raises Controversial Questions

In a story only loosely related,Mark Adams asks you to carefully consider this article by Mark Mejia.

Mr. Adams asks: Why is Osama bin Laden still breathing? And he replies to his own question, Ladies and Gentlemen, we may have found a clue.
Turkey's secular establishment, including the Turkish military and intelligence services (MIT), as well as political parties associated with former Prime Minister Tansu Ciller, appear to have been more connected to the Turkish mafia than the Turkish Islamic Parties that Washington abhors. Furthermore, it appears from reading into some of Edmonds' statements that the Turkish mafia was partnered with Osama Bin Laden's al Qaeda network in the drug trade - meaning Turkey's secular establishment was more connected to al Qaeda - pre/9-11 - than were the Islamists in Turkey.(My emphasis - Mark)
This is quite a thought-provoking read - I recommend it, but I do hope you'll use your critical thinking skills to take what is currently conjecture - unproven to date - and not use the information to jump to any immediate conclusions. I find it compelling, in light of these thoughts from Mr. Mejia and Mr. Adams, to know that there us such an increase in passion among the right wing to victimize whistleblowers (when you would think, by nature, for truth, and the "American way", that they would support quite the opposite. Are they afraid of what we might find out?