Jack Pritchard* asks:
"How many nuclear weapons does North Korea have to make before this administration gets serious about its policy in East Asia?"
*Pritchard is a visiting fellow of the Brookings Institution
"American intelligence believed that most if not all the rods remained in storage, giving policymakers a false sense that time was on their sideNote: Mr. Pritchard resigned as special envoy for negotiations with North Korea last August.
..the Bush administration has relied on intelligence that dismissed North Korean claims that it restarted its nuclear
program..
Now there are about 8,000 spent fuel rods missing — evidence that work on such a deterrent may have begun. It is just the most recent failure in a string of serious North Korea-related intelligence failures.
American policy in North Korea is hardly better than American intelligence. At best it can be described only as amateurish. At worst, it is a failed attempt to lure American allies down a path that is not designed to resolve the crisis diplomatically but to lead to the failure and ultimate isolation of North Korea in hopes that its government will collapse.

