New Republic is Decidedly Part of the Stop-Dean Machinery
They endorse Joe Lieberman
On the same day,
they make a case for Wesley Clark.
(Seems oddly contradictory, doesn't it?)
As Dean supporters, New Republic's assault upon the intellect and morality of Howard Dean is incredibly insulting to
OUR intelligence and
OUR morality.
Quote: "
The problem with Dean's vision of the Democratic Party is more than electoral; it is intellectual and moral."
To this, I can only reply that both Lieberman and Dean are intelligent, honest, moral men.
They have a difference in their views on how the Democrats conducted themselves over the past three years.
When it all falls out, we will be left behind to take those differences in ideology and let the chips fall where they may.
It is entirely out of line to make a moral issue of the differences.
After the heinous awakening in September, 2001, in the end, the choice between Lieberman and Dean is all about the ease with which the Democrats facilitated Bush's unnecessary (non-terror-related) war. Over 500 of our troops are gone now. We can't bring them back. Oh Lord, I wish we could. But we can insure we have a leader who won't hawkishly lead us (and our children) by the nose to another unnecessary war. The greatest case for Dean vs. Lieberman began in October, 2002. It is a matter of trusting the intelligent and reasonable intuition of a leader. We'll have rough waters to navigate over the next eight years. I trust Howard Dean the most. I'm confident most Americans will agree with me as we go through the nomination season.
Here's what I think about this New Republic Statement knocking Howard Dean:
"
The Democratic Party is racing back to the '80s.."
If they mean the 1780s, they may be right.
Howard Dean is reminding us all what the Constitution means and that we, the People, have a vested interest in participating to create a healthier democracy. Our ideas matter..not the ideas of the "New Democrats" and the "DLC".....but
all of us.
Take a look at this beauty from the New Republic endorsement:
"
Liberals resent Lieberman's moralism."
That, my blogdom friends, is what we call a crock of
shit (please pardon the French).
KOS has commentary about the TNR endorsement. He used the first phrase that came to my mind after reading the
schlocky piece:
Did I mention TNR sucks?
~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPI Analysis: Is Clark on the Skids?
"...Why did retired Gen. Wesley Clark "take a Sherman" and bow out of consideration as Howard Dean's vice presidential running mate Sunday? Clark is clearly "going for broke," still convinced he can grasp the Democratic presidential nomination. But it does not appear to be a wise strategy.
....For Clark is being unexpectedly whipsawed from two directions. He now finds himself fighting a political war on two fronts, and he is losing both of them.....
....All this could yet change. Clark might after all defy the polls and humble Dean as he expected to in the South and West. But so far, the poll numbers and the other data flowing in from the field all point against it. Clark is not breathing down Dean's neck. The cold, icy ghost of Al Haig's presidential meltdown is breathing down his..."