Hey Jude

Hey Jude

If you want to see some of my photography and favorite poems and inspirational quotes, I have a blog called Hey Jude.

I've also begun a list of links to Social Justice/Not For Profit Groups in the Syracuse area at the 'Hey Jude' site.

Onondaga Nation Files Historic Land Rights Action

Onondaga Nation Files Historic Land Rights Action
On March 11, 2005

Joe Heath, attorney for the Onondaga Nation, speaks to a group at the Westcott Community Center in Syracuse Thursday evening. Seated are Jeanne Shenandoah (l) and Tadodaho Sid Hill (r).
photo by Jude Nagurney Camwell

"Our Nation looks at the ecological disaster of Onondaga Lake, the most polluted in North America, and we weep. A century of degradation caused by callous corporations and indifferent government officials has transformed the lake, the center of Onondaga way of life and culture, into a toxic pool hostile to fish, wildlife and humans alike...Corporations should not dump their waste and then take away their jobs once the land has been sufficiently defiled. Central New York was once filled with amazing amounts of natural beauty, and the Onondaga want to reclaim that beauty for everyone. It is our calling, and it is our right."

- Sidney Hill, a Tadodaho (spiritual leader) of the Onondaga Nation.
from a column in the Syracuse Post Standard March 13, 2005

There was a Neighbor-to-Neighbor/Nation to Nation meeting held tonight at the Westcott Community Center in Syracuse. Sponsored by the Syracuse Peace Council, the topic was: "Water Connects Us All". Guest speakers were Tadodaho Sid Hill and Jeanne Shenandoah of the Onondaga Nation. Special guest was Joe Heath, the Attorney who, on March 11th, filed a land rights action which is based on New York’s violation of the U.S. Constitution and the 1790 Federal Trade and Intercourse Act. The Act made it make it illegal to acquire Native American land without federal government approval. New York State supposedly acquired the Onondaga lands through a series of agreements in 1788-90, 1793, 1795, 1817, and 1822 without federal approval. The taking of the Onondaga Nation lands also violated the 1784 Treaty of Fort Stanwix and the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua between the United States and the Six Nations or Haudenosaunee, as well as Haudenosaunee laws.

This land rights action is different from any that have been previously filed in New York State. The centerpiece of the suit is pollution and degradation of the land. The lawsuit seeks no actual monetary damages up front, and unlike other claims, there's no call for a casino or bingo hall. [link to this statement: News 10, Syracuse]

The Onondaga's relationship to the land and the water is embodied in Gayanashagowa, the Great Law of Peace. This relationship goes far beyond federal and state legal concepts of ownership, possession, or other legal rights. The people are one with the land and consider themselves stewards of it.

Tadodaho Sid Hill has said: "It is the duty of the Nation’s leaders to work for a healing of this land, to protect it, and to pass it on to future generations. The Onondaga Nation brings this action on behalf of its people in the hope that it may hasten the process of reconciliation and bring lasting justice, peace, and respect among all who inhabit this area."


I'll report on the meeting very soon here at Iddybud. Stay "tuned" (or should I say stay "linked"?)


*See Sean Kirst's column from the Syracuse Post Standard: "For tadodaho, sorrow accompanies land claim".

Steven Aftergood - Protecting Truth

"..massively important decisions about everything from war to architecture to medicine to farming--rely on a fine network of many little truths, the slight alteration of which can send people off on the most unfortunate paths."

- From Saheli's Musings and Observations

Steven Aftergood - Protecting Truth

Do you know that, since President George W. Bush entered office, the pace of classification activity has increased by 75 percent?

Saheli has a story that caught my eye. She comments that the thankless bureaucrat is "the best friend of the journalist, the historian, or the curious child who should wander into a library basement and realize that her Republic lies at her disposal." Saheli believes that, with our increasingly better tools for information organization and retrieval, we should be taking better care of it, not worse. I'm glad that Saheli has raised my awareness about the work of Steven Aftergood, whose speaking engagement she'd attended at Columbia. Aftergood impressed her with the idea that our national information is ours to access and to incorporate into our civic lives in order to benefit our Republic and its democracy. Saheli has asked us to understand and to consider supporting his cause.

Sign Petition to Defend Blog Democracy

Sign Petition to Defend Blog Democracy

Blogs are a perfect example of grass roots democracy at its best.We should not allow a law to stop the vibrant exchanges that occur throughout the blogoshpere.

A vast amount of people are participating in blogging and it makes no sense that they have to worry about violationg FEC law for speaking to someone about their opinions on politics as if they were standing on any American street corner talking to a neighbor.

It's true that the internet makes America a much smaller place than it once was. People to people, it's much easier for us to connect. That doesn't mean we should have to fear what we say might be subject to government scrutiny.

Why? Last time I checked, we were still a free country. We promote freedom throughout the world --why show the world that we disrespect the freedom of Americans right here at home?

Please sign this petition today at the One America site.

Just this much

Just this much..

A spiritual man said,
"To be truly present, all you have to remember is just this much!"

Holding his thumb and index finger apart about the length a spark might jump, just this much, just this eternal instant, just the living truth.

When memory falters, we are forced back into the living present, where life is to be lived. The past is irretrievably departed, only this morning's sun, only that love across the table.

Just this much remains.

<<>><<>><<>><<>><<>><<>>


inspired by Stephen Levine's Turning Toward the Mystery

Moral Values at Center of Political Discussion

Moral Values at Center of Political Discussion

Howard Dean says that Democrats can run on moral values as well as Republicans and that Democrats' programs to provide help for people reflect moral values more than Republican programs do.


John Edwards believes one of the greatest moral issues we face is the concern about leaving trillions of dollars of debt to our children, all because of President Bush's tax cuts for rich people.


Ernest Partridge has written an article titled A Master Morality, in which he states:

"Simply put, the best alternative to the “Master Morality” of Bush, Inc. is the political morality of the founding documents of our republic; the political morality that we once believed to be exemplified in our government; the political morality that the propaganda machine of Bush, Inc., is determined to convince us that we still have.

If and when the day comes that a critical mass of our fellow citizens comes to fully appreciate what has been taken from us, that will be the day that the fate of Bushism will be sealed."

It's the second time I've linked this MoJones interview with Jim Wallis of Sojourners, but it's a great example of current political discussion about moral values.


Howard Zinn fears that Democrats, in their political strategy aimed to seem less "reactionary" on abortion and gay marriage, will contribute de facto to the ideological atmosphere that will ultimately end up destroying support for the Women's Freedom to Choose and Gays' Right to Marry causes. He says:

"Let us also take a look at Democratic complicity in the outpouring of moral effluvia over abortion and gay marriage. Much ink has been wasted about the supposed emergence of “moral values” as a new reality around which Democrats must solemnly redraw their battle lines and retreat even further to the right. Anyone interested in defending the leftist position would refuse to acquiesce to the pretentious pseudo-morality undergirding Republican “values.” He or she would ask why the “culture of life” does not extend to people who are actually living, like American children and mothers in poverty, or Iraqi civilians under bombs, and why the “sanctity of marriage” is to be decided not by the actual people wanting marriage, but by the federal government.."

PHOTO

photo by Jude Nagurney Camwell

Castler

Summary: John and Elizabeth Edwards' First Podcast

Summary: John and Elizabeth Edwards' First Podcast
by Jude Nagurney Camwell
As seen on American Street

John and Elizabeth Edwards' first podcast has the feel of a 1940's-era fireside chat, a la 2005.



Former North Carolina senator and VP candidate John Edwards, along with his wife Elizabeth, who recently went through surgery for breast cancer, sat at their kitchen table with podcasting equipment set out on their son Jack's blanket. Their young children Jack and Emma Claire were "held at bay" temporarily while the Edwards sang their praises of Dairy Queen Blizzards and the UNC Tarheels (and a Nevada Wolfpack sweatshirt Elizabeth has packed away 'just in case').The NCAA basketball tournament was playing on a television in the background, admitted John Edwards, although its sound could not be heard over the podcast. He began by saying that the podcasting medium itself has had a personal impact on citizens, who are now able to have their voices more widely heard.

Elizabeth reassured listeners that her surgery (10 days ago) went well and that she will soon undergo radiation treatment as planned. She said that thousands of concerned people have reached out with e-mails and snail mail and that she appreciates every one. Due to limited use of her right hand, she's been slow to respond, but hopes to be able to respond to many of the get-well wishes. She is optimistic about the future. Both she and John are working on issues of Poverty, Work, and Opportunity all around the country. If citizens have any suggestions, they are urged to write to John Edwards via the One America website. Both Elizabeth and John hope the country will focus on the issue of poverty in weeks and months to come. John had been involved with homelessness-related issues in Raleigh (Urban Ministries) long before he ran for any political office. He is enthused about his new position at UNC Chapel Hill at the law school’s new Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity.

Elizabeth stated that Education has been an issue she has long championed. She has worked with after-school programs which she says were near and dear to her heart because the programs have provided every child with the opportunity to start "on the same launch pad". She plans to continue her work on Education issues.

John Edwards stressed that this is a cause - it's a movement. This is not about politics. This is not a campaign. He wants you to get involved by sending your questions and concerns (see website).

He answered a number of questions from the public. The first dealt with our electoral system and our vote.How can we ensure that every vote is counted? John noted the problems we saw in Florida during Election 2000 and Ohio in Election 2004.

He said that we Americans are responsible for electing the leader of the free world and that there is no one more important election in this world. Any reason to DOUBT the vote here in America is an outrageous thing to have to worry about. He cited the problems with vote challengers, black box voting procedures, non-auditable voting machines - and he said there was no excuse for such a lack of electoral integrity. The President needs to make a commitment to fair, reliable elections - especially in the poorest voting districts. Partisan politicians shouldn’t be in charge of the voting process. We deserve non-partisans overseeing the best, most relaible electoral system we could possibly have.

"We need these blogging leaders to continue to speak out. We depend on them to continue this fight."

The next segment dealt with the President's plan to reform Social Security. John said he believed that one of the great moral issues of our time, with which we must deal, is the fact that we're leaving trillions of dollars of debt to our children, all because of President Bush's tax cuts for rich people. The President's Social Security ideas will drive the country deeper into debt with a plan that will not strengthen the program, in the long run. John suggested a rollback of the Bush tax cuts and using a substantial portion of that money to shore up Social Security. He stated that we simply don’t need tax cuts for the richest people in the country. He commended Kos(Daily Kos), Josh Marshall (TalkingPointsMemo.com), and ThereIsNoCrisis.com for the great work they've been doing in thoroughly covering the Social Security issue.

"We need these blogging leaders to continue to speak out," said John Edwards, "We depend on them to continue this fight."

Elizabeth spoke a bit more about blogs and bloggers. With blogs, she said, discussions that take place today, by bloggers on the internet, used to take place in a vacuum. It's not true any longer. Journalists of mainstream media are using bloggers to provoke new questions and uncover public misstatements. Politicians are held to the integrity of their statements because of concerned, informed, and attentive bloggers.

Both John and Elizabeth said they believe that a non-partisan solution of problems is recommended to save programs like Social Security and Medicare. Taking benefits away from seniors on Medicare and Social Security is dangerous. Elizabeth's father is a military veteran who served during two wars - Viet Nam and Korea. The medical care promised to him is not there. Medicare cutbacks are absolutely terrifying to senior citizens. Many strip themselves of their lifelong savings and assets to go into Medicaid because Medicare has failed them. Prideful people who feel that they’ve done the right thing all their lives, our Senior citizens expect the benefits they were promised, if they contributed. They see Social Security and Medicare as something they've worked hard for - and earned. The Edwards wish to work to stengthen these programs on behalf of our aging citizens.

There was a question from a young man named Tony, age 15— He wished to know how to keep young people involved and interested in political issues after a presidential election has passed.

John Edwards said that, over next four years, we (Democrats) need to be out visiting every part of country. Not just before elections. Starting now. Republicans are good at reaching out. He says that Democrats are capable of beating them by reaching out to people now. Young folks can get involved in the process by fighting poverty, which is what John’s campaign is all about. The Edwards' daughter Cate has gotten involved with a brand new organization called "Generation Engaged", which is a group where young people can connect and understand the importance of politics everyday - not just around election time.

The next question dealt with FEC restrictions on bloggers:
John Edwards said that blogs have played an enormous role in grass roots democracy and freedom. Blogs are a great medium and avenue for people to express themselves and their opinions. He does not wish to do harm to the GOOD that’s occurring now through blogging. If campaigns are paying bloggers (as is being carefully examined in the South Dakota 2004 election), there may be a realistic conflict of interest. Yet, we cannot stop the vibrant exchanges that occur throughout the blogoshpere. A vast amount of people are participating and shouldn’t have to worry about violationg FEC law. Blogs are a perfect example of grass roots democracy at its best.

Elizabeth added that she thinks it's silly for the FEC to come in and attempt to cut the flow of free speech through threats of fines. She likened it to the FEC regulating a conversation on a STREET corner! She says we cannot allow democracy to be stifled. Bloggers are generally the people who are most informed and who set a direction for public conversation. She said we don’t need to analyze blogs in terms of them being like the press. She praised the White House for giving a recent press pass to a blogger – she's glad to see blogs getting the respect they deserve. Yet, she said, we don’t need to compare blogs to journalism. Blogs should be considered to be a form of free expression of opinion, protected by the 1st amendment and should not be regulated by FEC.

On ANWR: John Edwards said he was against the latest bill passed by the Senate. He added that the Senate vote was a great disappointment to him. It did little to reduce our dependence upon oil. Alternative resources need to be researched and developed.

president2008

Go, Man, Go!

Go, Man, Go!
A Wednesday Groove

Hear John Edwards' Podcast - NOW!

Hear John Edwards' Podcast - NOW!

John Edwards Podcast - March 23

UPDATE:

The first John (and Elizabeth) Edwards Podcast is ready for you to hear.
Go to this address and download the MP3.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The "Today Show" will profile Senator Edwards and his work on poverty on Wednesday, March 23, 2005. Check your local listings and tune in!
______________

Wednesday, March 23, 2005
By David Ingram
JOURNAL RALEIGH BUREAU
John Edwards leads panel of experts on poverty at UNC-CH
Discussion on wealth accumulation bolstered by former senator, vice-presidential candidate in new role

_____________




On Wednesday, March 23, the One America Committee Web site will post John Edwards' first podcast. We hear that he will have a very special guest.

From the "One America For All of Us" Blog:

This week, March 23rd, John Edwards will participate in an exciting new medium: podcasting. He will answer your questions and update you on his family and projects.

What is podcasting? It starts with an MP3 file that will play on your computer or portable music player - but it acts like a subscription. This means you are alerted when there is a new podcast available - and you are always kept up-to-date!

How do I get started? Download free software for your Mac or PC at iPodder.org. Then check back here at One America: next week we will provide a link to download John Edwards' podcast!

Do you have a question for John Edwards? Click here to e-mail your question!


SUBSCRIBE TO THIS FEED:
http://www.oneamericacommittee.com/
podcast.xml

More about Podcasting:

See PODCASTING 101 at The One America website

______________

John Edwards would like to hear your ideas::

Today, at the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, I am going to join a group of prominent experts from across the country who have dedicated their careers to fighting poverty. We are going to talk about one of the most important things we can do to help lift people out of poverty and into the middle class - helping people save so that they can start getting ahead instead of just getting by.

While poverty is all around us, the first step in eradicating it is to shine a bright light on it. Here's what we know: 36 million Americans live in poverty today, which is 13 million more than 30 years ago. About one in four working families is earning so little they struggle to make ends meet. And nearly 30 percent of families have less than $10,000 in assets - which means that the value of their savings, their home, and their car altogether is less than $10,000.

What we can do as a country is help families build a foundation and a safety net so that if they have a medical emergency, lose a job, or go through a traumatic event like a divorce it doesn't push them off the cliff and into bankruptcy.

So today we are going to talk about how we can help families save and put money in the bank. We will explore ideas like establishing savings accounts for children at birth, like baby bonds, to help them prepare for the future. We'll also look at different types of savings accounts for adults with matching funds to encourage people to save. And we will take a close look at ways to help more families become homeowners while also making sure that predatory lenders don't take away homes families already own.

These are some of the many ideas that we will discuss. We will report back on our blog but please let me know what you think we can do to help people save. Please visit the One America Committee Blog where we have started a new thread entitled: Poverty, Work, and Opportunity and give us your thoughts and ideas about this important issue. Some of our best ideas will come from you! Your input is invaluable, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Podcasting Info *thanks to Amy Gahran:

- What is podcasting and why should you care?
- How to receive and listen to podcasts
- What are feeds (RSS) and why should you care?


Podcasting News on John Edwards

Iddybud Thanks You

Iddybud Thanks You

I'd like to thank Common Ills and Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude for their recent comments and links.

From Common Ills:

"...isn't jude a groovy blogger? she's a woman and we're supposedly wondering where the female bloggers are so why doesn't she get more attention for all her hard work? or is that all 'so last week' already?"

From Sex and Politics, Screeds and Attitude:

"Jude of Iddybud has written an incredible entry on what's going on in Ohio today. It's entitled "Your Vote: Worthless in the Eyes of Media - Judging from the lack of news media coverage, you probably haven't heard about today's House Committee hearing." This puts the entire thing into perspective (no relying on implications or allusions I did). Again, please read the entire thing. (Though judging by the e-mails a lot of members already have Maria gets credit for being the first one to e-mail on it.)

there's your iddybud link.

Jude took on the issue, BuzzFlash is noting it and Ron of Why Are We Back In Iraq? is also addressing it providing background on why Kenneth Blackwell was 'too busy' to testify last time. (No, Ron's not justifying Blackwell's thumbing his nose at the Congress and the people.) From his entry entitled "Did Anyone Hear About The Hearing In Ohio?"

___________


These comments mean a lot to me. It's so good to know I'm not alone in this venture...this search for the truth in a labyrinth of mysterious-yet-blatant media ommissions.

I wrote to U.S. Rep Stephanie Tubbs Jones today to thank her for all the hard work she's done. I would imagine (from experience) that it all seems like a terribly thankless job to her, considering the fact that we're the only ones who seem to give a crap about all she's tried to accomplish.

By the way, Maria deserves the credit she's gotten at Common Ills on this story.

_____________

I thought this would be a fitting place to provide a link to Jeff Sharlet's (The Revealer's) latest entry - The Media Do Suck (Why The Heathen Rage) - Journalism, Democracy, and the Greatness of America's #1 Celebrity Weekly News Magazine

Excerpt:

"...my guide to understanding what myth, journalism, and democracy actually do -- is "bali to," a Papua New Guinean linguistic convention described by anthropologist Steven Feld in Sound and Sentiment as "turned over words," language that "encompasses aspects of analogy, metaphor, euphemisim, litotes, irony, and sarcasm" -- and that's just for starters. "Turned over words" are like a pretty stone you turn over in your hand; those with eyes to see discover that the other side of the rock reveals new meanings; turn it again, and there's another. Minogue celebrates this kind of perception in "religious people, philosophers, [and] scientists," those whom he defines as "genuinely educated." Such people "will find new things in quite exiguous materials"; but then, sooner or later everyone will. That's the problem with those damn words: They keep turning over. Myth, journalism, and democracy are all notoriously unstable, as is religion, a kinship across ways of knowing and living that will as often as not lead to unanticipated and undesirable outcomes."

Charlotte Bloggercon Slated for September 17, 2005

Charlotte Bloggercon Slated for September 17, 2005



According to the Trade Street Journal, Charlotte, North Carolina will host a regional blogger conference on September 17, 2005.

According to Dave Beckwith of Parker Web Developers:

"Small-business blogging will be given more attention, since there has been a veritable revolution in business blogging, much of which is so new as to have been impossible to cover during previous conferences."

*Dave is also my co-blogger here at Iddybud.

Conference: Examining Agenda of the Religious Far Right

"Until progressives come to understand what [fundamentalists] read, hear, are told and deeply believe, we cannot understand American politics, much less be effective."

- Joe Bageant

Conference: Examining the Agenda of the Religious Far Right
April 29-30

There will be a two-day conference co-sponsored by the NY Open Center and CUNY Graduate Center Public Programs, to be held at CUNY Graduate Center (Fifth Ave & 34th St, Manhattan) on April 29 and 30.

The conference, called Examining the Real Agenda of the Religious Far Right, will include some of my favorite political activists.

Speakers: Karen Armstrong, Joan Bokaer, Chip Berlet, Katherine Yurica, John Sugg, Hugh Urban, Frederick Clarkson, Jeffrey Sharlet, Skipp Porteous, Charles Strozier, Robert W. Edgar, and Joseph C. Hough Jr.
(presenter bios here)


Susan at Suburban Guerilla has a blog-post about a Mo-Jones interview with Jim Wallis (of Sojourners).

Betsy Cronkite

"They had a great relationship, a partnership in the real sense of the word."

- Kay Barnes, Mayor of Kansas City, cousin of Walter Cronkite, speaking of Walter and his wife Betsy

Betsy Cronkite

Kevin Hoffman did a very nice job on this article about Betsy (Mary Elizabeth) Cronkite, the beloved wife of Walter Cronkite. Last week, Betsy died after a long struggle with cancer. Walter and Betsy would have celebrated their 65th wedding anniversary later this month

My thoughts and prayers go out to Walter and his family.

Arrogant Blackwell Refuses to Admit Ohio Mistakes

Blackwell Gives the Finger to Concerned Voters
......but he won't give U.S. Congresswoman his hand to shake.

Yesterday, Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell appeared before a Congressional field committee and had the audacity to state, simply, that "everything went smoothly" in the Ohio election last November.

He called citizens' concerns - your concerns and mine - "fabrications and exaggerations". He even jabbed at people like me, who are talking about him on this blog. (Read the linked Toledo Blade story by Jim Provance).

I guess he cannot take criticism in a constructive or non-defensive manner. Regardless, I don't see how he thinks he can just sweep all these concerns away with his horrid accusations, arrogant insults, and closing his eyes and pretending the problems aren't there. Unless we allow him to do so.


"What you don't want to hear, or what you are not hearing, is that Ohio..had one of the best election administration performances in the country." said J. Kenneth Blackwell.

U.S. Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald (D., CA.), countered: "Irrespective of that, there have been allegations put out there. Again, you don't want to hear that, but they're out there."

According to U.S. Rep Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D., OH.), the arrogant Blackwell refused to shake her hand outside the committee room.

The divisive Blackwell is going to run for Governor in Ohio. The cause for his rise to national prominence? Delivering Ohio to George W. Bush, thus hijacking the election.

In January, U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., who prepared a report on election problems in Ohio, said that an improper fund-raising letter for Blackwell's gubernatorial run supports suspicions that Blackwell's actions as secretary of state during the election "stemmed from partisan political motivations" to help Bush.

Funny Photo

"Mini-Me" Tumor Appears on President's Head

"Just how's he gonna manage, lugging that extra dome around?" a bystander was reported to have asked.

Originalism

"More improbable than unique..".
Originalism has some incredible photography and prose.

I saw a joke I liked at the blog - from the Edinburgh festival:

"I joined a dating agency and went out on a load of dates that didn't work out. And I went back to the woman who ran the agency and said: "Have you not got somebody on your books who doesn't care about how I look or what job I have and has a nice big pair of boobs?" And she checked on her computer and said: "Actually, we have one, but unfortunately, it's you."

N.Z. Bear To Wed

N.Z. Bear To Wed



Sorry, girls. He'll soon be out of the running. N. Z. Bear is getting married. He's also known as Truth Laid Bear, owner of the Ecosystem. I'm very happy to hear the good news about Bear and his Lady M.
Here's wishing the best of luck and love to them both.

Brandenn

"It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live."

- Marcus Aurelius

Brandenn

There are some things that make me profoundly sad.
This is one of them.

Ted Honderich: The Principle of Humanity

Ted Honderich: The Principle of Humanity

I've been reading a book on free will and determinism by Ted Honderich. A fascinating philosopher, Honderich speaks of the series of causal lines which create our life narratives. I've been thinking about one particular point he made. He says that your own inner world, it can be argued, is no less "real" than the perceived part of the physical world. If the latter is not to be made into "mysterious stuff in the head" by its dependence on PERSONS generally, then why should your world of perceptual consciousness be degraded into such stuff by its dependency upon YOU?

While it seems that some people are "living in their own head", it's far too easy to consider them anti-social eccentrics (some call them 'geeks'). Think about the wisdom they could impart, by their (admitted) hyper-dependence upon their own neural system versus reliance upon persons, generally. Who are we to judge which is of more value - to that individual and what could be of value to the physical world by that person's very neural existence?

Since I cannot send you the entirety of his rather complex book "How Free Are You?", I thought I would share an online paper of Professor Honderich's, which is a politics-related philosophy. In it, he provides us with 10 observations about familiar principles, rules, maxims, and propositions mentioning equality, of which he says are reflective of "ordinary enlightened convictions and feelings."

He says:

The fundamental question to which liberalism, conservatism and other such things give answers - or should give answers - and arguments for the answers, is sometimes called the question of justice. It is the question not of what laws there are, but of what laws there ought to be, how societies ought to be. Better, it is the question of who ought to have what.
An answer needs first to decide on a prior question. Of what ought who to have what shares or amounts? My answers are given in this paper.

The first, to the prior question, has to do with our great desires, and the wretchedness or other distress of having them unfulfilled. Other answers have to do with bad answers to the main question, and then the right one. Morality has a majesty. Despite ourselves, and yet to ourselves, it stands over the rest of our existence, in particular over our self-interest in its various forms.

To my mind it is the Principle of Humanity above all that has that majesty.

Happy reading, should you decide to take the dive into Honderich's world of ideas.

______________

Other recent references from the reality-based philosopher:
Counterpunch- On Being Persona Non Grata

The Need for a New Disrespect:

"Murdoch of The Sun in England [and FOX News] has a thousand or ten thousand times greater control over the alternatives scheduled for debate and decision in a national election than you do. He is about that much more free to get what he wants for himself and the people with whom he identifies. You can safely say that they, some millions of them, are at least 100 times freer than the rest of us."