Negotiating With "Terrorists"

Negotiating With "Terrorists"

Christian Science Monitor - America's waning clout in Iraq

Jill Carroll and Dan Murphy explain how, because of the U.S. waning influence in Iraq today, Americans will likely cut a deal with political figures who've had direct ties to the insurgency in order to "cut the Shiites down to size." [the words of Dan Plesch, a research associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London]. This will very likely increase the short-term risk of violence. Expect more blood, violence, and death. It's too late, from a political standpoint, for the U.S. to "reoccupy" Iraq. Taxpayers would never "go for" the costs that it would entail in lives and treasure. Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad will be a key player in future negotiations (with "terrorists" - or whatever George W. Bush and the Pentagon are calling "them" these days). This is a far cry from the early muscular Bushworld promises of never negotiating with the "enemy." That kind of rhetoric may have won Bush some votes, but in the real world, it never could have won this war.

The idea of the creation of an international donor body is being entertained. It would have to be one that would allow for real influence to be exercised by all partners. David Mack, vice president of the Middle East Institute in Washington says:

"If we could do something like western Europe after World War II, where economic support for Iraq was internationalized and we contributed heavily, that would be far more attractive to the Iraqis than anything we have offered so far."

This should be an interesting development to watch.

Jon Stewart to host 78th Oscar Awards Show

Jon Stewart to host 78th Oscar Awards Show



Ohhhh, yeah. This is gonna be good....

...according to three sources familiar with the process, the job of hosting the 78th Academy Awards will go to Jon Stewart, the Emmy-winning writer-host of "The Daily Show"

I look forward to the laughs.

PEN World Voices Festival 2006

PEN World Voices Festival 2006

The second PEN World Voices Festival will feature 50 international writers who will gather in April, 2006 to explore the timely theme of Faith and Reason. Some of the featured writers:

Chris Abani, Boris Akunin, Sherman Alexie, Roberto Calasso, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Nadine Gordimer, David Grossman, Moses Isegawa, Elias Khoury, Henning Mankell, Helen Oyeyemi, Anna Politkovskaya, Asne Seierstad, Colm Tóibín

Nadia - A Victim of the Silent War in Afghanistan

Nadia - A Victim of the Silent War in Afghanistan
Women in Afghanistan, victims of domestic violence, continue to struggle for their rights

Violence against women in Afghanistan is still a major problem. Being female - being a writer - and being a wife in Afghanistan is still an extremely perilous proposition. This is a story that is a couple months old, but was only discussed briefly on the blogs. Last November 4, following a fight with her husband, young Afghan poet Nadia Anjuman died. Farid Ahmad Majid Nia, 27, Nadia’s husband of 15 months, was arrested and charged with her murder. A lecturer in philology at Herat University, he has vehemently proclaimed his innocence. Nadia committed suicide, he insists. His story goes:

She became angry, and cursed me, calling me names like ‘ass’ and ‘son of a bitch’. I slapped her,” he said. A few hours later, according to Farid, Nadia came to him and told him she had taken poison. [about.com]

Nadia’s family and friends did not believe her husband.

“Farid called me and told me that Nadia had taken poison,” said Nadia’s mother, who did not want her name used. “But when I got to the hospital, I saw that Nadia’s face and neck were all bruised.

A close friend of Nadia said:

“Nadia was very religious and she strongly condemned those who committed suicide. She said it was against Islam.”

This is not to publically try the husband, but to point out that violence against women should never be accepted or tolerated - not in any culture. What makes this even sadder is that Nadia and her husband had a six-month-old daughter. What will that little girl grow up to understand about her mother, whose face and touch she may never remember?


Three generations of women in Herat, Afghanistan
photo credit: Johns Hopkins University

Women are not seen as human beings in Afghanistan, but like commodities that people can sell, trade or buy. There are totally inadequate human rights for women in Afghanistan - they cannot study, they cannot work, they are married off at the age of tweleve or thirteen.

From Kabul, there came an open letter from the Afghan Women’s Network related to Nadia's murder:

Even though human rights issues are greatly discussed and cared for by the society and the government, protection of women’s rights has not been a priority. The murder of 25-year-old poet Nadia Anjoman by her husband, a university professor in Herat, is a symbol of this inhuman violence that has strongly affected people who care for and struggle to protect human rights and human values.

The United Nations condemned the killing as symptom of continuing violence against Afghan women four years after the fall of the Taliban. Afghanistan is a place that is rich in poetic tradition where the common people love to hear or read poems and often know quite a few by heart. The Sufi poet Rumi was from a village in what is now Afghanistan. Nadia risked torture, imprisonment, perhaps even death to study literature and write poetry in secret under the Taliban. She was becoming well known, especially in literary circles. She was widely praised for her first book of poems, titled "Gule Dudi," or "Dark Flower." A tip of the hat to Mah-mag for the translation of one of Nadia's haunting poems:

A poem by: Nadia Anjuman
Translated by: Mahnaz Badihian



No desire to open my mouth
What should I sing of...?
Me, who is hated by life,
No difference to sing or not to sing.
Why should I talk of sweetness?
When I feel bitterness.
Oh, the oppressors feast
Knocked my mouth.
I have no companion in life
Who can I be sweet for?
No difference to say, to laugh,
To die, to be.
Me and my strained solitude.
With sorrow and sadness.
I was borne for nothingness.
My mouth should be sealed.
Oh my heart, you know it is spring
And time to celebrate.
What should I do with a trapped wing?
Which does not let me fly.
I have been silent for too long,
But I never forget the melody,
Since every moment I whisper
The songs from my heart,
Reminding myself of
A day I will break the cage.
Fly from This solitude
And sing like a melancholic.
I am not a weak poplar tree
To be shaken By any wind.
I am an Afghan woman,
Makes sense to moan always.

There is a webpage dedicated to Nadia here.

I have seen no updates on the murder case, and I wonder if any will be forthcoming. Nadia's words call out for justice, in her own case and in the case of all women in Afghanistan today. It is said that terror will always be present where democracy fails to exist. If that is true, what can we say of the new "democracy" in Afghanistan? If women continue to be terrorized in the quiet places beyond the sounds of the warlords' guns and bombs, how has democracy succeeded?

When we hear our President speaking about "bringing terrorists to justice," we have to ask ourselves - what happens to the terrorists who are culturally empowered to abuse women?


_____________

In other women's news, Ritu Sharma, president and co-founder of the Women's Edge Coalition, a Washington-based advocate for the world's poorest women, explains why she believes that investing in women and giving them a prominent voice and role in reconstruction is the most effective way to help a community recover from natural disasters.

At the Women's Edge Coalition website, there are updates on the Tsunami recovery.

Abramoff Fallout Will Hurt Republicans

Abramoff Fallout Will Hurt Republicans

From William Rivers Pitt [Truthout]:

According to campaign donation information gathered by the non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics, the following officeholders and candidates have received political donations from Abramoff since 2000:

Tom DeLay (R-Texas). John Ashcroft (R-Mo.). Frank A. LoBiondo (R-NJ). Eric Cantor (R-Va.). Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). John Ensign (R-Nev.). Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.). Charles H. Taylor (R-NC). Chris Cannon (R-Utah). Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Mark Foley (R-Fla.). Richard Pombo (R-Calif.). Christopher S. "Kit" Bond (R-Mo.). Curt Weldon (R-Pa.). Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.). Doug Ose (R-Calif.). Ernest J. Istook (R-Okla.). George R. Nethercutt Jr. (R-Wash.). Jim Bunning (R-Ky.). Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.). Tom Feeney (R-Fla.). Dan Burton (R-Ind.). Eric Cantor (R-Va.). Suzanne Terrell (R-La.). Rob Simmons (R-Conn.). Charles W. "Chip" Pickering Jr. (R-Miss.). Connie Morella (R-Md.). Gordon H. Smith (R-Ore.). James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.). James M. Talent (R-Mo.). John T. Doolittle (R-Calif.). John Thune (R-SD). Tim Hutchinson (R-Ark.). Bob Smith (R-Fla.). Bob Ney (R-Ohio). CL. "Butch" Otter (R-Idaho). Carolyn W. Grant (R-NC). Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.). Elizabeth Dole (R-NC). Heather Wilson (R-NM). J. Randy Forbes (R-Va.). Jack Kingston (R-Ga.). James V. Hansen (R-Utah). John Cornyn (R-Texas). Kimo Kaloi (R-Hawaii). Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.). Mike Ferguson (R-NJ). Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). Ralph Regula (R-Ohio). Ric Keller (R-Fla.). Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.). Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). Thad Cochran (R-Miss.). Dave Camp (R-Mich.). Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.). Tom Young (R-Ala.). Bill Janklow (R-SD). Craig Thomas (R-Wyo.). Spencer Abraham (R-Mich.). William L. Gormley (R-NJ). Bill McCollum (R-Fla.). Bill Redmond (R-NM). Bob Riley (R-Ala.). Claude B. Hutchison Jr. (R-Calif.). Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.). Francis E. Flotron (R-Mo.). George Allen (R-Va.). Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.). Walter B. Jones Jr. (R-NC). Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). Bob Smith (R-Fla.). Joe Pitts (R-PA). Charles H. Taylor (R-NC). Bob Ehrlich (R-Md.). Charles R. Gerow (R-Pa.). Ed Royce (R-Calif.). Elia Vincent Pirozzi (R-Calif.). Jerry Weller (R-Ill.). Mark Emerson (R-Utah). Tom Davis (R-Va.). Van Hilleary (R-Tenn.).

Also:

Americans for a Republican Majority, Leadership PAC of Tom DeLay (R-Texas). Republican Majority Fund, Leadership PAC of Don Nickles (R-Okla.). Keep Our Majority PAC, Leadership PAC of Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). Leadership PAC, Leadership PAC of Michael G. Oxley (R-Ohio). Rely on Your Beliefs, Leadership PAC of Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). Friends of the Big Sky, Leadership PAC of Conrad Burns (R-Mont.). Senate Victory Fund, Leadership PAC of Thad Cochran (R-Miss.). American Liberty PAC, Leadership PAC of Bob Ney (R-Ohio). Battle Born PAC, Leadership PAC of John Ensign (R-Nev.). Fund for a Free Market America, Leadership PAC of Phil Crane (R-Ill.). Team PAC, Leadership PAC of J.D. Hayworth (R-Ariz.). The Republican Party of New Jersey.

Also:

George W. Bush (R).

Notice anything similar? Each and every name listed, each and every PAC, has an (R) after it. The Center for Responsive Politics does not have one Democrat - not one - listed as having received a donation from Jack Abramoff.

Sharon Suffers Stroke, Olmert Acting PM of Israel

Sharon Suffers Stroke, Olmert Acting PM of Israel

My prayers go out to Israel's leader Ariel Sharon and his family. The Prime Minister suffered a massive stroke yesterday. Reuters has offered some facts on Israel's acting prime minister, Ehud Olmert. One of the most relevant is the fact that although he served as a legislator for the right wing party Likud in the 1990s, Olmert broke with more hardline faction colleagues by backing a leftist proposal for Palestinian self-rule. He quit Likud last November to form the more centrist Kadima Party.

The Christian Science Monitor reports that, with Sharon sidelined (perhaps permanently), Israel faces a political vacuum.

Tar Heel Tavern #45

Tar Heel Tavern #45

Justin has a great new edition of the Tar Heel Tavern at The View From the Cheap Seats for your viewing. It's the 45th Edition - and the first for the new year.

In other carnival news, the third eition of the Carnival of the Liberals at Science and Politics.

Bush and the Future of Iraq

Bush and the Future of Iraq

President Bush gave a fairly convincing speech today (a rarity as far as I'm concerned), telling us what we can expect this year in Iraq. As things get incredibly messy in Iraq, it sounds as if Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (who should have been fired years ago) is finally giving the Generals some serious consideration (2100+ troop's lives too late). Here is what we're told to expect:

- fewer US troops as we move through 2006 (not a surprise)
- an increase in number of US forces dedicated to training Iraqi security forces
- an increase in our support of intelligence capabilities
- police training led by Lt. General Martin Dempsey
- embedded coalition troops in Iraqi police units (called transition teams)

The President says he's disturbed by stories about the sectarian militias in Iraq, as well he should be. They're making his success in Iraq - along with his positive Presidential legacy - an impossibility at the present time.

I have recommended a greater call for international police-training support and an actual coalition of international police forces that will replace US armed forces. The sooner our troops are removed as an occupying force in Iraq, the sooner security will be possible for everyday Iraqis. I do not believe that we can reach true success in Iraq alone, and while I trust Lt. General Dempsey to do the best job that he can in training police forces, I realize that he's playing with fire. He's in charge of training police officers who will have some culturally instilled differences from ours. We are empowering those who consider what we see as human rights abuses as an acceptable option. I know General Dempsey will face a lot of violent (and possibly insurmountable) opposition based on organic hatred between Iraqi sects. He will need the support of the international community (especially from Middle Eastern nations) or Iraq is going to be a place where the purple-fingered freedom-seekers will be not able to live in peace.

If President Bush cares about his legacy, he'd best secure it with an assurance of success without worrying about his neoconservative cheerleaders. As Harvard's Stephen Walt recently said, "Realism says one should isolate one’s enemies while maximizing allied support, and a foreign policy that is doing the exact opposite is hardly in the U.S. national interest."

If the President wants to gain our confidence, he should start by firing Donald Rumsfeld, because Rumsfeld has misled him (and all of us) every step of the way. The President should begin listening to people who really care about what happens to the people of Iraq. If Iraq continues to descend into violent chaos, Bush's last rationale for war (after all others have factually crumbled) will fall flat on its face. I sensed some sincerity in Bush's statements this morning but I believe that he needs to rethink his strategy. I do think he's getting closer - although I don't think any of us will ever get over the one fact that will haunt the historic retelling of the Iraq war, especially if the Iraq experiment fails:

The war was never necessary.

Meanwhile, there are potentially destructive forces in this world that move independently because we have forgotten to place importance on international respect.

I keep asking myself this question:

How much money did certain Americans make off the back of this unnecessary war?

There is a child dying every few seconds in this world because of a poverty for which our nation has been particularly stingy - yet we pay dearly in tax dollars for an unnecessary war. Worse, someone was enriched. I wonder how the creeps who made tons of money from this war of option can live with themselves. Bush said "We lost some really good folks" this year in Iraq - and he's right.

Who was enriched by the death of good folks?

12 Coal Miners and False News

And as they work beneath the clay,
With heads bowed down these miners pray,
That God will hear them up above
And send them safely to the ones they love.


Miner Folk Art by Frank "Wyso" Wysochansky of Northeastern PA, whose father died in the coal mines

Now if this cannot come to pass,
And he must pay the price at last.
The miner leaves his last demand
Keep my child safe above the land.

- A Coal Miner's Prayer
by John & Millie Quann


12 Coal Miners and False News

I can't begin to express my sorrow over the news I got this morning. I went to bed last night with the false belief that 12 miners had survived after the disaster in Tallmansville, West Virginia. Upon awakening, a friend who knew why I was especially concerned about the welfare of the miners gave me the awful news - and I thought he was joking. All the hype I'd heard on the cable news networks last night reminded me of what self-righteous pundits often accuse bloggers of doing - running wild with rumor and misinformation. I was angry to have been misinformed. My heart dropped to my feet for the families.


Petition for a US Postage Stamp dedicated to the Coal Miner

I understand the sorrow of a mining family, for I have shed the tears over a miner's life gone too soon. My grandfather was a miner in the anthracite coal mines of northeastern Pennsylvania, and he was another statistic of the deathly toll that the mines take on hard-working men. Black lung disease took him before he had a chance to see his grandchildren grow to adulthood. He, of all people, would have wanted to be here to see us. He is the one who struggled to see that my generation would never have to look at the shafts of the mines. A sculpture of a coal miner by the American folk artist Frank "Wyso" Wysochansky, who did the sketch you see above, sits on my father's bookcase in his home office. Wyso had given the sculpture to one of my great aunts as a gift when he was a very young man. There is an exhibition of Wyso's work currently being shown at the Seigel Gallery, Iacocca Hall at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. It runs through February.

The miner does the most dangerous of jobs - and he does it every workday. I heard someone on a cable news network calling the lone survivor a hero. If he is a hero, every coal miner is a hero, whether or not he's lived through a blast. If we see these men as heroes, why don't we get behind them and push for better safety regulations for them? Why is it that we only call them heroes when they die - or when they survive a horrendous accident? Why does Republican government resist the miners' union organizing?

"The false news about survivors spread quickly after people overheard cell phone calls.."

I hear the media starting to play the blame game for the confusion last night. In some way, I believe they are responsible for hyping what turned out to be nothing more than rumor based on some ringing church bells. There was undoubtedly a lack of appropriate gravitas before stories of survivors were confirmed - a decided lack of professionalism - - which I imagine will be a story in and of itself. I'm sure there will be tiresome navel-gazing from the media as they backtrack from embarrassment.

Katrina: Looking Back/Looking Ahead

Katrina:
Looking Back/Looking Ahead

From an NPR wrap-up of 2005 by Ron Elving:

Katrina will surely be a milestone of the first order for the Gulf Coast and for millions who were directly affected. But will it reverberate beyond? In the fall, some predicted that the scenes of horror from New Orleans would spawn a reconsideration of race relations and a new era of concern for the nation's underclass. If that's happening somewhere, it's not apparent in Washington. An initial surge of sympathy has ebbed, and the victims are finding out the degree to which they're on their own.

Katrina was also set forth as a potential turning point for the Bush presidency, the moment at which his re-election momentum disappeared and disappointment overtook his second term. But by year's end, Mr. Bush was battling back in the polls and showing signs of resilience on the issues. Looking forward, Katrina's historical and political legacy is uncertain.

There is no doubt that the American public's collective jaw dropped after seeing the quality of FEMA's Hurricane Katrina response. The shocking realization that New Orleans was worse off than many third-world places hit by natural disasters caused 'Heckuva-job Brownie' to be replaced by a far more efficient and capable Coast Guard Vice Admiral Thad Allen. American citizens proved that they were a compassionate and generous people by sending billions of dollars in charitable contributions to the victims of the hurricane. Over this Holiday season, 38,000 families remained in hotels rooms nationwide - waiting to return to what once was home - and facing an uncertain future. The Bush administration still has a long way to go to fulfill the promises they have made to restore the city of New Orleans - and to retain the character of the city rather than gentrifying it or making it just another opportunity for corporate-cronyism. Beyond the chatter about the rebuilding efforts lies the reality of Two Americas. Some things in New Orleans may change, but for the millions of Americans who are among those living below the poverty line and the working poor, nothing will change unless we remember their human faces.



It seems that it's harder to motivate ordinary citizens to respond to a disaster that is as entrenched - albeit invisible - as poverty. It is a condition that clearly existed in New Orleans before Katrina blew the curtain away to reveal poverty's human face. In the case of New Orleans, the majority of those faces were those of African Americans, but poverty is not racially exclusive or selective. Poverty exists in urban America and rural America and in every corner of each American community. One thing that cannot be denied, however, is the fact that we met the face of poverty in New Orleans last September.

Will Americans remember that, just as important as rebuilding the Twin Span bridge from New Orleans to Slidell, Louisiana, that we need to do the hard work of building real and lasting bridges out of poverty? See my post titled "The Helping Hand":

EXCERPT:

Bishop Jakes spoke about the Twin Span Bridge that connects Slidell, Louisiana to New Orleans which was partially submerged by Katrina and will need rebuilding. He called it a symbol of our need to rebuild bridges between our ideas, our perspectives, and our differences - we must build unity. "We can't multiply by dividing and we can't add by subtracting," said Bishop Jakes. If we rebuild that bridge with unity, it could make a real difference, letting go of the divisive illusion that we're black or white; Democrat or Republican; "right" or left." The true vision, he said is "One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

Will the realities of Katrina continue to reverberate beyond the Mississippi Gulf Coast?

On Spiritual Equipment and Flabby Pieties

On Spiritual Equipment
and Flabby Pieties

Playing on what I see as the incredibly divisive nature of Christianity in today's American public square, Robert Ferrigno has written a novel that uses as its premise a post-terror scenario where blue states have converted to Islam and red states have broken away from a new American Islamic Republic, forming a Christian republic in the South.

In a recent post about an overview of his book, titled Prayers for the Assasin, I particularly appreciated Mr. Ferrigno's characterization of "flabby piety" in today's American public square. We are at war with those who fight with a viciously-held fundamentalist religious ideology. Call it brainwashing, call it instilling a nature of the violent duty "for God.." - call it what you will - it seems to be quite effective. It seems that the hard Islamic right fundamentalists are not easily won over by the promise of Western democracy, with its promises of shopping malls or hamburgers, boob jobs, and abortions on demand.

How will we pay, as a united nation, for the privatization, the watering-down and the flattening of the mysticism of Christianity - an assasination in itself, perpetrated for decades by the Christian Right - to a few narrow issues? While Democrats fail to convincingly articulate the faith that has shaped their individual value systems and world views, the voice of the Christian Right dominates and thus defines the American media discussion of values.

"..ask yourself what kind of leader would you trust to lead you through dark and perilous times?"

Is more piety - genuine piety - the answer to countering - and winning - a one-sided Holy War?

Christian piety and politically religious "muscular" piety (born of American national theology not resembling the faith itself) seems to be a perfect vehicle for hypocrisy, when the two considerations are placed side-by-side. The nation is divided on our approach to this war because it is unilaterally a Holy War, with American leaders dabbling in religious self-helpisms that you'd find in mini-books you'd buy at Eckerds or Wal Mart. For an example, consider Bush quoting Longfellow's plea for "Peace on earth - good will to men" in his recent speech about his plan to kick insurgent Islam's ass.

How morally effective is the answer we are currently providing - to kill them (and collaterally kill their children and facilitate their martyrdom) if they don't "comform?"

What about all the people who are not Christian - and those who do not believe in God at all? History has mocked and silenced these people. Wasn't American democracy supposed to give them a voice? What will change in the future for those who demand a government free from religion? Why are our elected Representatives so quick to ignore or respect the libertarian-leaning citizens who want as little religion in government as possible? (We already know why - it won't get them re-elected - a great reason for supporting strict term-limits.)

I'm glad Mr. Ferrigno wrote this book at this time. We need to intelligently discuss, without the fear and exasperation of being labeled as anti-American; anti-religion; - anti-anything - the evil genius behind politicians using (and abusing) our religious values to carry on their anti-faith, violent, bloody, elective, unnecessary, and unjust wars.

Here is the Robert Ferrigno quote that inspired the title of my blogspost:

We live in an innovative, sectarian nation, which values personal freedom and creativity, but it also leaves us shortsighted and vulnerable, demanding quick fixes and steady progress. In a generation-long war, technology will not matter as much as the absolute belief in the rightness of one’s cause and the willingness to die for those beliefs. The ongoing and deadly hostility between the Sunni and the Shiite branches of Islam stems from the martyrdom of Imam Hussein, the grandson of the prophet Muhammad, in a battle over 1300 years ago. Can you remember who won the World Series two years ago? Which culture do you think is better equipped spiritually to fight a fifty-year war?

"Moral ambiguity and cultural relativism are luxuries when the ground shakes beneath your feet."

In contrast to the moral certainty of Islam, we have the flabby pieties of our own leaders. George Bush talked about angels watching over the U.S. after 9-11, and then suggested that we all go shopping, lest the terrorists win. John Kerry’s Catholicism was high on his resume when he ran for president, but he was unapologetic about his thirty-year record of voting against any limits on abortion, in clear violation of the most basic tenets of his Catholic faith. Now try to imagine an Islamic politician stumping with a ham sandwich in his hand, or suggesting that shopping is the best defense, and ask yourself what kind of leader would you trust to lead you through dark and perilous times?

Moral ambiguity and cultural relativism are luxuries when the ground shakes beneath your feet.

- Robert Ferrigno, former reporter and author of a new novel, Prayers for the Assasin

I think that this new book will have no trouble finding a wide audience. I look forward to reading it.

Preamble to Impeachment

Preamble to Impeachment

Please join me in reading and signing this new petition - Preamble to Impeachment by Syracuse, NY citizen Robert Schad.

I have lost faith that the majority Republican power in the House and Senate would ever grant us any respect regarding our concerns, especially when we've heard the constant escapist defense "But we're at war.." to eliminate all democratic accountability - a mockery of us when you consider that the very war for which we demand accountability is the one they use as their defense.

The Republicans' credibility is all but gone for all of their partisan clinging to a (mis)leader who lost the trust of dutiful, concerned, thinking citizens long ago. They need to understand that clear fact. They ignore citizens' pleading for openness and truth to the nation's detriment.

World Day of Peace

World Day of Peace

Message of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI For The Celebration of the World Day of Peace

1 JANUARY 2006

Tom Lasseter On Iraq Army Polarization

Tom Lasseter On Iraq Army Polarization

This is a very important statement, used by Tom Lasseter of Knight Ridder in a column about the polarization of the Iraqi army:

Thiab Abdul Hadi, a city council member in the western Sunni city of Fallujah, said that sentiment was held by most people in his town. "It is our duty to resist the (American) occupation because this occupier helped the militias enter our country," Hadi said. "The resistance is fighting the Americans because they back these militias."

My concerns, as stated recenty, are reinforced by the real beliefs of this city council member and his constituents. Sunni Arabs who distrust the political process in Iraq and who are fighting US forces are not "insurgents." The Sunnis will have a democratic part of the new parliament. They are a section of the Iraqi populace who are now part of the political process, and Zalmay Khalilzad has to get them to deal with their problems in the parliament.

Do you believe this man's statement?

"...only the Americans" benefit when Iraqis attack Iraqis, "so they will have an excuse to stay in Iraq."

- Muthana Abid, a member of the largest Sunni Arab political party to take part in recent efforts to form a new parliament, after five members of his party were murdered in an explosion at the party's office in Khalis, about 35 miles north of Baghdad. [source: WaPo]

It doesn't matter whether or not you believe his statement. He believes it, and so do his community members.

What leads so many Sunni Arabs to believe such things? We'll go back to Tom Lasseter:

The perception that different army units are tools of Shiite or Kurdish ambitions has been reinforced during the past two years as U.S. troops conducting offensives in western Iraq and in Sunni neighborhoods in Baghdad teamed up with Iraqi soldiers and Interior Ministry police commandos who were mostly Shiites or Kurds.

It's Catch-22. President Bush claims that if our troops leave Iraq, there will be civil war. Meanwhile the U.S., simply by our presence in Iraq, is prolonging the insurgency by alienating the Sunnis in what is actually a sub-rosa civil war with Iraqi militias threatening to act out their own respective sectarian warfare (as Lasseter pointed out last week in the case of the Kurdish Peshmerga and Kirkuk). If this problem is ever going to be ironed out without Iraq falling to pieces, don't expect our troops to leave Iraq for decades.

There is a haunting Boston Globe headline from 2003.

Violence derails Iraq rebuilding. Security needs take precedence

An Iraqi aid worker is quoted as saying:

"The more dangerous their nation gets, the more many Iraqis blame the Americans."

The people with the purple fingers represent hope. Every time an Iraqi politician is murdered, you can be sure that a little more faith, hope and trust is lost. Security needs still take precedence in Iraq over any other issue, almost three years after we (allegedly) set out to win Iraqi hearts and minds. We lost 844 Americans last year in Iraq, and countless Iraqis were killed - not only by US forces, but also by murderous attacks made on Iraqis by fellow Iraqis. What a tangled web of insecurity and doubt. While it's a no-brainer that the insurgency could never win a military victory over the U.S, it's the political war that we seem to be losing, elections notwithstanding.

This is going to take a hell of a long time - and we may not succeed. Our troops are endangered by potential failures of our foreign policy in Iraq. Overt US business interests ("ensuring" that our friends the Kurds and their Peshmerga control Kirkuk, which I'm not saying is bad or good - but the Sunnis can clearly see it, too..) seem to be in direct conflict with the military mission of seeking the solidarity of the Iraqi armed forces and the peaceful union of the new Iraq. Did it ever occur to you that Bush's "Plan for Victory" may be for Iraq - but the United States could wind up the big international loser? As Juan Cole predicted today for 2006, Saudi Arabia (the place where most of the 911 hijackers came from) will probably use the $160 billion windfall from high petroleum prices (which we paid for at the pumps) to strengthen its military and security forces, and to spread its rigid Wahhabi form of Islam; the Iraqi parliament will pass fundamentalist Muslim legislation; and the guerilla war will continue.

Really, though - I'm a hopeful person when I see something to be hopeful about.

New Years Eve Peace Vigil at Clinton Square

New Years Eve Peace Vigil at
Clinton Square, Syracuse, N.Y.




On New Years Eve afternoon, citizens of Central New York left the warmth of their homes, taking a break from holiday festivities to join in a collective resolution to end the Iraq War in the New Year.




The vigil was sponsored by Syracuse MoveOn and the Syracuse Peace Council. They gathered at Clinton Square under the holiday lights. When the chimes rang out 4 p.m. here in Central New York, 2006 began in war-torn Iraq.



Signs in Clinton Square - "War Has Not Made Us Safer"

Standing in the shadow of the Christmas creche in the city's public square, concerned citizens stood for an hour in solidarity with the thousands of peacemakers throughout the world who call for an end to the occupation of Iraq.



Katie Barrett



Vigil attendees brave the Syracuse cold to send their message

"The Syracuse Clinton Square New Years Eve Peace Vigil was an inspiring, memorable moment, right out of Norman Rockwell and Hallmark.
Note the signs, the issues, the USA flags--flags that represent the hopes and dreams of us as a people, as a nation."

- Austin Paulnack, coordinator Syracuse Moveon
Moveon.org, Syracuse

Related articles:

News10Now - Vigil for peace held in Clinton Square

Renée K. Gadoua / Syracuse.com - Peace activists demonstrate at Clinton Square

All photos are by Photos by Rob Schad, MoveOn activist, Syracuse NY

Juan Cole: Predictions for 2006

Juan Cole: Predictions for 2006

Ten Amazing Predictions for 2006 - Juan Cole

This is a must-read "reality-based" set of predictions from the learned Professor Cole. He rarely steers us wrong - and that's why it's important for us to study the predictions - and understand and anticipate the international challenges that we will likely face in the coming year. Radical partisans will ignore these likely scenarios and discount the Professor's intellect and intuition at the nation's peril.

My Blogging Year 2005

My Blogging Year 2005



I wish you a very Happy New Year!




January - Presidential Inauguration (and a blizzard in D.C.)

________________




February - I was added to Anonymoses' Blogollage

My vote for Best Coverage of the Eason Jordan resignation: Jay Rosen/Press Think

________________




March - The Onondaga Indian Nation filed a land rights action different from any aboriginal land rights claim in U.S. history.

_________________




April - I attended the CUNY/Open Center conference on Examining the Real Agenda of the Religious Far Rightin New York City.

__________________






May - Made the Cover of YES Weekly - the Alternative Newspaper in Greensboro NC with some of the grooviest Blogsboro bloggers on the planet.

The Second Annual Personal Democracy Forum conference took place at CUNY in Manhattan. (photos)

__________________





June - Iddybud Debuts On CNN's "Inside the Blogs"

My vote for Best Coverage of the Randy "Duke" Cunningham scandal: Josh Marshall/Talking Points Memo.

___________________




July - I had the great pleasure of meeting New York's next governor Eliot Spitzer in Liverpool, N.Y.

The first Blogher conference took place in California. The second BlogHer "Conference '06" will take place Friday July 28 and Saturday July 29, 2006 in the San Francisco Bay Area.

In late July, 1,300+ people attend the Spiritual Activism Conference in Berkeley, California (and hundreds more had to be turned away). The Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP) is launched. It is a grassroots interfaith organization formed around the ideas articulated in Rabbi Michael Lerner’s article, “Why America Needs a Spiritual Left.” A second conference will be held in Washington D.C. in May, 2006.

___________________




August - I was greatly saddened by Peter Jennings' death.

___________________




September - Appeared as guest blogger all week at the One America (Senator John Edwards) website

___________________




October - John Edwards Invites Young People to Join the Fight Against Poverty

Converge South, held in Greensboro, NC, was an important blogger happening.

___________________




November - I began to imagine a real (non-violent) solution to the problems in Iraq and around the world. I spoke of a new global alliance. Some said I was a dreamer - but I know I'm not the only one.

Greatest New Emerging Political Issue:
A Wider Public Discussion of Faith and Values

A New Faith and Value Blogacracy Emerges: Talk To Action

A New Activist Group of Spiritual Progressives Work to Make Positive Change: Network of Spiritual Progressives

Best Faith Activist Websites: Sojourners and Tikkun

____________________




December - I lost my dear mother after her valiant three-year struggle with cancer. I thank everyone who sent their condolences and prayers.

_____________________





The Nation - The Most Valuable Progressives of 2005 By John Nichols

NPR - Separating the Footnotes from the Milestones by Ron Elving

Chalabi Appointment: Not About Democracy - About the Neocon Dream

"Democratic elections do not always work as prophylactics to safeguard freedom."

- Arnaud de Borchgrave

Chalabi Appointment: Not About Democracy -About the Neocon Dream

Democracy Schmem-ocracy. WMD Schmubble-u-MD.
The Iraq war has been about oil-profit lust, economic imperialism, and lining the pockets of the politically corrupt all along.

"The Kurds are now in a position to slowly *muscle the Arabs out of Kirkuk, the key to control of the northern oil fields, the city where Saddam Hussein had muscled the Arabs in." -Arnaud de Borchgrave

*The word "muscle" apparently meant in a morally equivocating sense regarding the use of violent force to cleanse Kirkuk of Arabs?

Arnaud de Borchgrave, editor at large of The Washington Times, seems to be preparing his readers to accept that ethnic cleansing of Kirkuk will be the right thing to do (or at least the natural and expected thing) - all because Saddam Hussein "arabized" the region. Has he ever heard of citizens of diverse ethnicities living side by side? Oh wait - that would be the democratic way, wouldn't it? What was it we were "spreading" to the Middle East, again?

Ethnic cleansing, by any means of "muscling", force or violence, is never morally acceptable. You cannot invoke a deposed dictator's name to justify ethnic cleansing and expect it to be seen as a moral idea. We could very well be looking at a new Isreal-Palestine-style conflict as a permanent part of the future in Northern Iraq - unless we truly commit to supporting true democracy in Iraq here and now.

We're choosing sides in Northern Iraq - especially in Kirkuk - because of our economic interests - and every purple-fingered Iraqi knows it (whether it's "good" or "bad" to support the Kurds - the Sunni Arabs know what we're doing and they don't trust us). It hurts our military mission - it endangers our troops.

Borchgrave is asking us to look past Iraq and look forward to our next war: Iran. And make no mistake, he's already chiming in with a recommendation to cold-cock the UN again.

Sticks in the form of U.N. Security Council sanctions against Iran now carry all the punishing power of twigs.

I am disgusted with mainstream editors planning the wars that will take my son - and yours. I won't stand for this anymore. The Bushes and Borchgraves of this world are pushing our nation closer and closer to a time when we will once again justify using our own nuclear weapons against an innocent populace. When will this seeming love for violence, arrogant unilateralism, thirst for riches, and fear-mongering end?

Some of our political leaders in Washington DC wanted Ahmad Chalabi, who'd received $27 million of U.S. taxpeyers' money in recent years, to prevail in Iraq - even though his filthy lies caused those same leaders to initiate a war in Iraq that was never necessary or just. Chalabi was dumped by voters in Iraq - dumped soundly - fair and square. Voters (in Iraq) didn't want the schlump to be in power. So what did the powers that be in America do to keep their lying scumbag friend around? Sure as you're born, Chalabi's friends in the U.S. shoehorned him in as the new oil minister.

This is just another indication that this war has never been about anything other than securing oil rights and oil dollars for America (and its lobbyists and whichever US elected representatives are in their pockets).

Bush and company will never tell the families of the troops who were killed (or maimed) in Iraq that their sons and daughters died for the oil that's greasing the slimy pockets of the corrupt people in Washington D.C.. No American wants to believe that even one of our precious American soldiers died for a lie. I am sickened to have to say it, sick to my heart, but I really am beginning to believe it now. I know I'm not alone.

We should remember this - no freedom-seeking purple-fingered Iraqi citizen wants to believe that their son or daughter died for an American lie. They didn't want a U.S. occupation - but they got it. They didn't want Chalabi - but they got him. They don't want a neo Israel-Palestine conflict in Kirkuk - but they might get one. And the Washington Times editor wants you to accept it as a fact of war instead of a result of pure greed.

Damn every major mainstream media outlet that shoe-horned this administration into power and who allowed their own journalists, like Judith Miller, to participate in the greatest con game and deception ever perpetrated on the American people. This is an America devoid of meaningful values.

Where is the America that our forefathers envisioned? Washington D.C. needs a good cleaning out in the next election. 2006 should be known as "the year that corruption would not be taken anymore."

Bloggers Talking About 2008

Bloggers Talking About 2008

David Hoch of Gainesville, Florida, has friends who will no longer listen to his ceaseless political rants, so he's taking his act on the internet. David likes former Senator and VP candidate John Edwards - and he tells you why.
Welcome to the blogosphere, David.

The Left Coaster asks if it will matter whether or not Hillary Clinton had been supported by the netroots by 2007. He links a post by Professor David D. Perlmutter at his blog titled PolicyByBlog that covers the netroots and the impact bloggers are having on the shaping of the presidential races. Th epost includes a copy of an e-mail sent to Senator Clinton by Florida netroots activist Bob Kunst of HillaryNow that includes the statement:

"...your re-election is guaranteed by a landslide.."

Stepping away from Democratic party politics, I'd like to remind everyone that, after the last two presidential elections, we are playing with fire if we believe there are any guaranteed "landslides" for Democrats - unless we have taken the place of the GOP of being in the pockets and hearts of Diebold et al. A (small-'d') democratic abandonment of the issue of electoral integrity in this nation does not inspire the same confidence in me regarding electoral landslides for any Democrat. Seeing Senator Clinton making "flag-burning" her (uninspiring) pet issue, compared to her public worry over the integrity of the Electoral College system in 2000, shows the Senator to be a new political animal - and I don't see it getting her anywhere with the "I-hate-Clinton" crowd. Senator Clinton needs to dance with the ones what brung her.

On a somewhat related note, Professor Perlmutter has noted that

the National Journal's Hotline has dubbed John Edwards "The most active potential candidate" of the blogosphere.

I have greatly enjoyed taking part in the One America blogging this year.
Elizabeth Edwards has posted a holiday story about the Edwards family Christmas today.

"Maverick"

"Maverick"



I saw this news item about a "maverick" secular Sunni politician in Iraq. His name is Mithal al-Alusi. He is looking to do what G.W. Bush has never attempted to do in good faith. Here is what al-Alusi wants:

"His goal, he says, is to form an antiterrorism alliance that would include the US, European countries, Turkey - and the Jewish state."

I wish this gentleman luck. He sounds like the kind of leader this world could use. I am still scratching my head in wonder at the fact that our President and his administration literally shunned the cooperative efforts of the international community in the year following the 9/11 attacks - when the world was poised to join us in our anti-terrorism efforts.

It's refreshing to hear voices from the Middle East that appeal to the angels of our better nature.